Tag: no-latest

  • David Hockney, 88, renowned artist who captured fleeting moments in vivid color

    David Hockney, an English painter, photographer, stage designer, printmaker, and draftsman who long made Southern California his muse and his home, and the fleeting beauty of life’s smallest moments the grand theme of his shape-shifting art, died June 11 at his home in London. He was 88.

    His publicist Erica Bolton confirmed the death in a statement.

    Mr. Hockney’s art, which earned him international renown and a colossal fortune, encompassed paintings of azure swimming pools and the artist’s gay friends; kaleidoscopic portraits collaged together from dozens of cocktail-napkin-size Polaroids; room-size installations using computer-controlled theatrical light fixtures; and, in later years, garish landscapes “drawn” with fingers on an iPad.

    Throughout these stylistic reinventions, over a career that seemed at times to memorialize the unmemorable, there was one constant: impermanence. “I loved the idea of painting this thing that lasts for two seconds,” Mr. Hockney once said, reflecting on The Splash, one of a series of paintings of water displaced by a recreational diver who is nowhere to be seen. “It takes me two weeks to paint this event that lasts for two seconds.”

    In 2018, at Christie’s auction house in Manhattan, his Portrait of an Artist (Pool With Two Figures) sold for $90.3 million, a world record price for a living artist, topping the previous record of $58.4 million reached by American Jeff Koons in 2013 for his stainless steel sculpture Balloon Dog (Orange).

    Mr. Hockney, a working-class lad from what was at the time England’s grimy industrial north, became a top pupil at London’s Royal College of Art. In 1963, his first solo exhibition sold out at a trendy London gallery. He soon traveled to California, long the center of his hedonistic fantasies fueled by muscle magazines.

    Like his pop-artist friend Andy Warhol — whom he vaguely resembled with his peroxide-blond hair — he was strongly influenced by technological advances in color photography, color ads in magazines, and early color TV. He deconstructed traditional ideas of perspective, proportion, and color balance with his often vivid pinks, blues, greens, yellows, and purples.

    Man in Shower in Beverly Hills (1964) indulged his fascination not only with the male figure but also with water in motion. A Bigger Splash (1967), perhaps his best-known painting, captured the broken surface of a pool, the diving board protruding from the foreground. Today the work hangs in the prestigious Tate Britain museum when it is not on tour.

    Beverly Hills Housewife (1967), depicting philanthropist and art collector Betty Freeman standing on her patio, fetched $7.9 million at a Christie’s auction in New York in 2009. Mr. Hockney’s previous highest price, in 2006, had been $5.4 million for The Splash, painted in 1966.

    “What David did was reinvent the way we saw the world,” Lindy Dufferin, the widow of one of his early patrons, told British Vogue in 2017. “Up until then a splash had passed without us noticing; the pool and the people around it would interest us, not the splash. So, as is typical of David, he made a deep philosophical point — that everything is ephemeral and passing — in a humorous way.”

    Mr. Hockney’s artistic restlessness led him to remake himself and his work over the years, with portraiture and still lifes from the decorous to the vibrant, such as his 16-foot-long May Blossom on the Roman Road (2009) with its foliage and swarming insects. Some of his later and best-selling works were landscapes depicting the American West and the forests of his native Yorkshire.

    Woldgate Woods (2006) sold at Sotheby’s in New York in 2016 for a record auction price of $11.7 million. In 2017, his composite painting 15 Canvas Study of the Grand Canyon (1998), with its deep, earthy sunset colors, sold at Sotheby’s in London for $7.88 million. As his age and celebrity grew, so did his prices. In May 2018, at a Sotheby’s auction in New York, his 1990 work Pacific Coast Highway and Santa Monica went under the hammer for $28.5 million — more than twice the estimate and a record for a Hockney.

    His prevailing fascination was with taking the mundane — household objects such as ashtrays and lamp shapes and passing moments like a shower — and emancipating them from the workaday as commentaries on what and how we see.

    “He is one of only a handful of 20th-century British artists who added anything to the image bank of the world’s imagination,” Guardian art critic Jonathan Jones wrote in 2004. “He was British art’s first pop star. But this was not because he made easy images. His paintings unequivocally praised gay sex — for example, Two Men in a Shower (1963). They were so innocent they disarmed everyone.”

    Visionary or lightweight?

    David Hockney was born in Bradford on July 9, 1937, the fourth of five children of what he called eccentric, “radical working class” parents.

    His mother, who was deeply religious and devoutly vegetarian, encouraged her son’s doodling as long as he didn’t do it on the wallpaper. His father, he told the Guardian, “was constantly writing to Stalin — every week. He used to tell us how important these letters were. We didn’t think so. We didn’t think Stalin would be waiting for them.”

    A conscientious objector during World War II, the elder Hockney became a social pariah, losing his job as an accounting clerk.

    Bradford, Mr. Hockney recalled, was perpetually cold and overcast, and made drearier still by wartime rationing in the 1940s and postwar deprivation in the ’50s. He escaped through movies and became enchanted with the concept of sun-dappled California.

    “I knew even as a child that it was sunny in Los Angeles because even though Laurel and Hardy wore overcoats, they cast long shadows,” he once told the New York Times. “There were no long shadows in Bradford. I noticed that. I thought, ‘Boy, it must be very sunny there.’ ”

    Mr. Hockney displayed a precocious talent for cartooning and poster-making and won second place in a national newspaper competition to design an advertisement for a watch. He entered the Bradford College of Art at 16 on a scholarship and graduated in 1957. Also a registered conscientious objector, he worked as a hospital orderly to complete two-year national service.

    From 1959 to 1962, he studied at the Royal College of Art, where his works earned the school’s gold medal. The next year, art dealer John Kasmin gave him his debut solo exhibition, “Pictures With People In.”

    At the college, Mr. Hockney also met the Ohio-born artist R.B. Kitaj. Incorporating Kitaj’s literary leanings, he used fragments of poems and quotations from Walt Whitman in his work. Paintings such as We Two Boys Clinging Together (1961) were among his earliest artistic nods to his homosexuality.

    A chain-smoking playboy, the artist became a hero to some in the LGBTQ community for being openly, indulgently gay at a time when homosexuality was still criminalized in England. Jack Hazan’s 1973 semidocumentary film A Bigger Splash shows Mr. Hockney reeling after the trauma of a breakup. Mr. Hockney was also the subject of Randall Wright’s well-received 2014 documentary Hockney.

    After his initial success in London, Mr. Hockney made his first trip to New York, where one friend introduced him to the city’s museums and galleries and another took him to its gay hot spots. Mr. Hockney soon embarked for California, beckoned by magazine images of beaches, suntanned pecs, and six-pack abs.

    He set up a studio in Hollywood Hills, teaching at several universities in the state, while also maintaining a home in the posh London district of Kensington as well as a seaside house in Bridlington, East Yorkshire.

    In 1975, Mr. Hockney began designing stage sets for theater, ballet, and opera, starting with a noted production of Stravinsky’s opera The Rake’s Progress at the Glyndebourne Festival in East Sussex, England.

    Over the decades, Mr. Hockney was viewed alternately with admiration and skepticism, as a visionary who played with convention and as a lightweight drawn to the frivolous.

    Commenting on a major Hockney retrospective in 2017 at Tate Britain, the British art writer Michael Glover observed in the Independent: “Is Hockney really deserving of this ridiculous amount of attention on the grounds of merit alone? Certainly not. He can be wonderful — some of those early prints were wonderful. He can be awful — as he so often was in the 1980s, when he played at being Picasso or doggedly painted his dogs. He can also be no better than pretty good. Many of his portraits look tossed off.”

    But Chris Stephens, formerly lead curator of modern British art at Tate Britain and co-curator of the Hockney retrospective, called him “brilliant at capturing people’s psychological aspect, their psychological demeanor.”

    One of Mr. Hockney’s best-received works was a time-lapse installation titled Snails Space with Vari-Lites, “Painting as Performance,” created in 1995-1996 and donated to the Smithsonian American Art Museum in Washington in 2003 by philanthropist Nan Tucker McEvoy, who chaired the museum’s governing board.

    The work features a nine-minute light show in which high-intensity, computerized spotlights cast a rainbow of colors from ever-changing angles upon a 3D landscape that is more stage set than painting. Describing the Snails Space exhibition, the museum declared it “both a summary of Hockney’s career and a poignant example of his belief that art should ‘overcome the sterility of despair.’ ”

    From 2004 to 2013, Mr. Hockney decamped for Yorkshire, looking for new inspiration in the trees and the turning of the seasons — and also because of what he considered puritanical antismoking ordinances in America.

    His return led to the financial windfall of Woldgate Woods. But it also brought tragedy, including a stroke in 2012 and the death the next year at his home studio of a 23-year-old assistant who drank drain cleaner after taking cocaine and ecstasy pills. The death was declared “a result of misadventure” and no charges were brought against Mr. Hockney, who was away at the time and later returned to Los Angeles.

    In 2018, Mr. Hockney, at age 81, achieved a longtime ambition that earned him no money and cost him a lot of time. His first stained-glass window, designed on his iPad and titled The Queen’s Window, was unveiled in London’s historic Westminster Abbey to commemorate Queen Elizabeth II’s reign.

    In sharp contrast to the Abbey’s traditional staid, religious-themed stained-glass windows, Mr. Hockney used his distinctive color palette of yellow, red, blue, pink, orange, and green to reflect the queen’s love of the countryside. He visibly held back tears as the window was revealed. The Barley Studio of York, England, using centuries-old techniques, painstakingly created the window in pieces in coordination with Mr. Hockney and his iPad creation.

    In 2019 Mr. Hockney began working in Normandy, producing ink drawings and paintings including A Year in Normandie, a massive panoramic iPad painting inspired by the nearby Bayeux Tapestry and his fascination with Chinese scrolls. He relocated to London in 2023.

    The director of Tate Britain, Alex Farquharson, said in a social media post that the gallery would work to realize two major projects Mr. Hockney was preparing for 2027: an exhibition featuring seven decades of his work and a multimedia installation at the Tate Modern showcasing his designs for opera sets.

    Survivors include his longtime partner, Jean-Pierre “JP” Gonçalves de Lima; and two brothers.

    Stephens, the former curator at Tate Britain and also a Hockney biographer, told the Times of London in 2017 that Mr. Hockney was happiest basking in the libertine joys of California. “He says, ‘Well I only have to go out for three things: the doctor, the dentist, and the marijuana supply.’ Which is not true, actually, because the guy who washes his car brings that round.”

  • U.S. plan is said to pull a third of fighter jets it provides NATO for Europe

    U.S. plan is said to pull a third of fighter jets it provides NATO for Europe

    BERLIN — The United States plans to significantly reduce the aircraft and warships that it makes available for NATO operations in Europe, according to two senior European officials, accelerating America’s effort to scale down the protection it has offered to European allies for eight decades.

    The decision would limit NATO’s ability to launch long-range strikes and conduct surveillance. It was communicated to allies in early June in a written document, parts of which were reviewed by the New York Times. The European officials, who were briefed on the decision, spoke on condition of anonymity to speak more freely about sensitive military plans.

    The planned drawdowns include:

    — Reducing the number of F-16 and F-15E fighter jets from roughly 150 to 100

    — Reducing maritime reconnaissance aircraft from 26 to 15 and cutting all eight aerial refueling tanker jets previously available to Europe

    — Reallocating a missile-launching submarine and an aircraft carrier, along with several warships and scores of jets that join the carrier’s missions

    — Reallocating one of two groups of bombers previously assigned for Europe’s defense

    The Pentagon declined to comment on the specific numbers in the document, and referred to a statement by its European Command last week that spoke in general terms of its intention to reduce its commitments in Europe.

    These details, some of which were first reported in the German news outlet Die Welt, provide the clearest picture yet of the extent to which the Trump administration intends to reduce its commitment to NATO, a military alliance created in the aftermath of World War II. NATO’s purpose was mainly to protect U.S. allies in Europe from external threats such as the Soviet Union, and its European members still see it as essential to their ability to deter Russia.

    The Pentagon has not yet publicly revealed the timeline for the drawdown but U.S. officials have indicated it will take effect very soon — far earlier than European counterparts had been preparing for. The abrupt cutoff of U.S. forces would affect NATO’s ability to, for example, monitor Russian submarine traffic or launch long-range Tomahawk missiles deep into Russian territory.

    Though Europeans have similar missile-launching capabilities, experts say that the missiles act as a bigger deterrent to Russia when wielded by the United States, since Europeans may be warier of deploying them.

    “While each of these cuts can be managed individually, together they represent a significant posture change and pose challenges to European deterrence readiness across the spectrum,” said Giuseppe Spatafora, of the European Union Institute for Security Studies, a Paris-based think tank.

    President Donald Trump has complained for years about the burden that the United States shoulders in its contribution to NATO. He has repeatedly called on Europe to do far more to defend itself without U.S. support, and threatened to leave the alliance altogether. But his administration had only followed through with one-off announcements about relatively small withdrawals from individual countries — until the June document detailing the sweeping reductions to American support for NATO as a whole.

    The cuts will be mitigated by the fact that U.S. troops in Europe will still constitute one of the largest NATO forces on the continent. The drawdown’s effects will also be softened by the fact that European leaders, seeing a need to rely less on U.S. support, were already in the process of rearming their countries.

    But Britain’s defense secretary quit Thursday, accusing the government of spending too little on its military. And Europe is struggling to coordinate its rearmament; on Tuesday, Germany confirmed its withdrawal from a project to build a new fighter jet with France and Spain.

    For some Europeans, the specific number of U.S. assets assigned in Europe is less important than the question of whether Trump is prepared to deploy any of them in combat.

    Anton Hofreiter, a German lawmaker, said: “NATO’s main problem is that, as long as Trump is president, there is no longer any faith that the U.S. would come to the Europeans’ aid in the event of an emergency.”

    The drawdown comes at a particularly tense moment for Europe. In late May, a Russian drone hit an apartment block in Romania, the first such strike in a major urban area in NATO territory. Combined with other Russian drone intrusions into NATO airspace, it raised European fears that Russia might expand its aggression beyond its invasion of Ukraine.

    Ed Arnold, of the Royal United Services Institute, a security think tank in London, said that while the drawdown could be worse, “it will have the effect of focusing minds.”

    The details of the drawdown were communicated privately as top U.S. defense officials spoke publicly about their intention to reallocate forces to defend American interests in the Indo-Pacific region.

    The head of the Pentagon’s European Command, Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, said in early June: “There has been an unhealthy codependence in the NATO Force Model on U.S. forces.”

    The general, who is NATO’s top military commander, added: “President Trump, Secretary Hegseth, and others have been clear that this needs to change, and it will change. The potential reality of simultaneous conflict in multiple theaters demands it.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • Algae forms in the Reflecting Pool. It’s ‘residual,’ Trump officials say.

    Algae forms in the Reflecting Pool. It’s ‘residual,’ Trump officials say.

    When renovations of the Reflecting Pool were completed last week, President Donald Trump praised its “beautiful, clean water.” Under his predecessors, Trump said, the pool was “Terrible. Disgusting … garbage ridden.”

    Now, days after the pool was refilled, clumps of green algae have been spotted throughout the water. Noticed on two separate visits to the Reflecting Pool this week, the algae coated several areas of the bottom of the pool, including the east and west ends, close to the World War II Memorial and the Lincoln Memorial, and floated on the surface.

    An algae spot near the World War II Memorial grew significantly bigger between a rainy Wednesday afternoon and Thursday, which was hot and muggy.

    News photographers also captured images of buckets of Induclor, a chlorine compound used to control bacteria, algae, slime, and fungi in bodies of water.

    Trump officials have an explanation: “What you are seeing is residual algae from the supply lines which have been sitting dormant for eight weeks while construction has been taking place. It’s part of the normal startup process,” Katie Martin, an Interior Department spokesperson, said in a statement.

    “We are removing the algae, and the nanobubblers will maintain the pool and keep it algae free. President Donald J. Trump is an expert builder who has fixed the Reflecting Pool for good unlike the failed and extremely costly attempt by Obama and Biden.”

    Trump on Thursday touted his changes to Washington, including his resurfacing of the Reflecting Pool’s basin.

    “It always leaked because it was done in stone,” the president told reporters in the Oval Office. “Now it’s done properly. It’s not going to leak at all.”

    When asked about the algae, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers replied in a statement: “President Trump used his expertise to deliver exquisite upgrades to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool that Americans will enjoy for years to come. The public supports these long-overdue improvements to our nation’s capital, and hit pieces like this are exactly why trust in the media is at an all-time low.”

    Algae has been a consistent problem for the pool, and quickly reappeared after a $34 million renovation that was completed in 2012.

    The plantlike aquatic organisms thrive on sunlight and heat, abundant in D.C.’s summer months. They are controlled through proper water filtration and chlorination, algaecide, and nanobubbles, tiny bubbles of oxygen that effectively cut off the algae’s food supply.

    Trump has touted his rapid renovation of the reflecting pool as a playbook for how he wants to make over Washington: move quickly to launch and complete construction projects, even if it requires bulldozing through regulations and red tape.

    Trump announced his plans to resurface the pool on April 23, saying the project would take about a week and cost less than $2 million. The project ultimately took six weeks and cost more than $14 million, drawing a lawsuit from historic preservationists who said Trump had flouted requirements for public comment and other necessary steps. Democrats also have pressed the White House on why the administration has issued no-bid contracts and rushed work on the reflecting pool and the president’s other construction projects.

    “While it is important that we maintain our national landmarks as they age, the scale, cost, and permanence of these projects has revealed troubling patterns of waste, fraud, and abuse across these episodes,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D, Conn.), the top Democrat on the Senate’s permanent subcommittee for investigations, wrote in a letter Tuesday to Park Service leaders. The letter was shared with the Washington Post.

    Trump has repeatedly defended his changes to the century-old pool as necessary, calling its water “filthy” and “disgusting,” and claiming that he has fixed the site’s repeated problems, such as persistent leaking.

    “I’m looking at the Washington Monument and this thing is terrible. The water is dirty, there’s cartons of stuff in it, and everything is just so horrible,” the president said at the White House last month. “It’s a much better job. This will last for at least 50 years and you’ll never have a leak.”

    White House officials this week echoed the president, saying that even critics should concede that Trump’s changes were for the better.

    One official mocked the pool’s smell before Trump’s changes.

    “I don’t think anyone can argue” with Trump’s renovations, the official said. The official declined to comment on the reappearance of algae.

    The “American Flag Blue” paint — another of the president’s choices for the renovation — has maintained the pool’s mirrorlike reflective qualities. But up close, the dark color is a high-contrast backdrop for bird droppings, which could also be observed this week, along with the families of ducks that had returned to the water.

  • Judge rules Trump can stage UFC fights on the White House’s South Lawn this weekend

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled on Friday that the White House is allowed to stage a UFC show this weekend in an elaborate ring already built on the South Lawn to celebrate the nation’s 250th anniversary — on President Donald Trump’s 80th birthday.

    U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta rejected a legal advocacy group’s request to block organizers from using the White House lawn as the venue for Sunday’s planned UFC mixed martial arts event.

    Mehta concluded that the plaintiffs likely don’t have legal standing to challenge the event and have failed to prove that they would suffer irreparable harm by the event going forward as planned. The judge also cited the plaintiffs’ “unreasonable delay” in suing to challenge an event that’s been in the works for months.

    “In the context of an emergency application — and coupled with the fact that the UFC fight date was long ago known — it is fair to say Plaintiffs unreasonably delayed bringing suit, undercutting their claims of irreparable harm,” Mehta wrote.

    Attorneys from the nonprofit Public Integrity Project sued to challenge Trump’s UFC Freedom 250 event on behalf of an activist and a Vietnam War veteran. The two plaintiffs also asked the court to block organizers from building anything for the event on White House grounds, including a 92-foot-tall, 600-ton steel structure called the Claw.

    The plaintiffs’ alleged “aesthetic harms,” the judge noted, are temporary since the Claw will be disassembled starting Monday morning and staging equipment at the Lincoln Memorial must be removed before then. “The President’s musings about permanency of the Claw does not move the dial in the face of a White House official’s clear representation,” the judge wrote.

    The White House called the lawsuit a baseless attempt to prevent Trump from hosting an event that’s no different from many others routinely hosted at public forums in the nation’s capital.

    Trump’s administration can’t issue permits for sporting events on the South Lawn or at the Lincoln Memorial, where UFC fighters planned to hold a news conference in front of fans on Friday, according to plaintiffs’ attorneys. They noted that the event is a privately organized, for-profit business venture, with VIP packages costing millions of dollars.

    “The President’s administration is granting the UFC an extraordinary business opportunity it may not lawfully grant, and in exchange the UFC is throwing an event at which its leadership, fighters, advertisers, and various celebrities will all pay tribute to the President on his birthday,” plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote.

    Public Integrity Project attorney Brendan Ballou said the plaintiffs were disappointed in the judge’s decision but respect it and intend to “keep bringing cases to raise the cost of corruption in America.”

    “This isn’t a case about a sporting event, it’s about corruption, as a handful of people and companies stand to profit from our public monuments,” Ballou said in a statement.

    The National Park Service and the Interior Department are named as defendants in the lawsuit.

    In 2019, during his first term in office, Trump became the first sitting president to attend a UFC show. Trump, a Republican, is a friend of UFC president and CEO Dana White.

    Mehta was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, a Democrat. Mehta has presided over other Trump-related cases, including civil litigation accusing Trump of inciting a mob of his supporters to attack the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, after he lost the 2020 presidential election to Joe Biden, a Democrat.

  • Lights! Camera! Cage match! The White House lawn’s Octagon is ready for Trump’s 80th birthday bash

    WASHINGTON — It looks from afar more UFO than UFC.

    Maybe it’s the kind of contraption that has carried space aliens to the White House to force a meeting with America’s leader.

    But come closer and you’ll see the contours of the eight-sided cage, 30 feet in diameter and shaped, with careful precision, like the MMA league’s signature Octagon.

    That is, a STOP! sign flipped on its edge, with wire-mesh sides and padded corners fitted with different sponsors’ logos: Morgan & Morgan, Bud Light, Dodge Ram, Corona Extra, and Polymarket, which identifies itself as the world’s largest prediction market.

    Overhead looms the Claw, a four-sided mass that arcs more than 90 feet into the air and features lights, speakers, thick snakes of wiring, and four large screens so fans not seated right next to the Octagon can follow the cage fighting below.

    Think more of the four-sided, metal grabby thing that tries to grasp stuffed animals at a video arcade rather than what house cats have — hence the extraterrestrial vibes.

    And surrounding all that are risers filled with gray folding chairs forming a temporary arena expected to seat 4,000-plus people for the seven UFC fights being staged on Sunday to celebrate the 80th birthday of President Donald Trump and the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence’s signing.

    “Quite attractive to a lot of people”

    For non-UFC fans, all of this might be disorienting under any circumstances. But the temporary arena is covering nearly the entirety of the White House’s South Lawn, where Marine One usually lands to ferry the president to out-of-town trips and gobs of kids scramble in the grass during the Easter Egg Roll every spring.

    More than $60 million and tens of thousands of hours of labor have been poured into building the arena, according to a court filing from the National Park Service, which oversees the South Lawn and contested a lawsuit meant to block the event. Federal Judge Ahmet P. Mehta on Friday declined to block it, ruling it could go forward.

    The White House says the UFC is covering the costs, though the filing states that seven agencies — including the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Aviation Administration — have “allocated significant resources and manpower.”

    Fighters, their entourages, and assorted support staffers are expected to take over the driveway and part of the West Wing when they’re not fighting. But they’ll enter the arena via curtained-off walkways with access to the Octagon.

    They, as well as ordinary attendees of Sunday’s spectacle, will have picturesque views of the White House’s Executive Residence and its storied Truman Balcony on one side and the Washington Monument towering in the distance on the other. All of it will be accentuated by swirling spotlights, and perhaps even sweat and blood pouring off the fighters pummeling each other.

    A packed pre-event schedule included a news conference at the Lincoln Memorial with UFC chief Dana White and the fighters on Friday night.

    The schedule also includes a ceremonial weigh-in for combatants on Saturday at the Ellipse, a park near the White House, where organizers expect 120,000-plus visitors to watch Sunday night’s proceedings on large screens after winning free tickets in a lottery.

    Stunt athlete Travis Pastrana is also set to do a potentially death-defying backflip on a dirt bike on the White House lawn as part of the preshow extravaganza.

    Trump has called the Octagon and its Claw “quite attractive to a lot of people.” He’s even suggested that maybe the temporary structure could become permanent, like the Eiffel Tower, which he notes was originally built as part of the 1889 World’s Fair but then was never taken down.

    Only the president knows how serious that suggestion really is.

    The fights will go on rain or shine — despite a lack of covering

    Work on the arena began May 20 and has continued for weeks. During a walk-through for reporters on Thursday, construction noises — particularly sanding and hammering — could be heard. Giant cranes were carrying materials around overhead, though that was for the $400 million ballroom that Trump is building nearby, not the UFC fight.

    The remaining grassy lawn around the arena, on the other sides of the White House, has been fitted with supplemental spotlights. But the grass that normally grows between the White House and the start of the risers for the arena is now gone, with nothing but dusty dirt that will need to be resodded when this is all over — unless the president really does decide to leave the arena up permanently.

    There’s also a large Freedom 250 logo standing between the White House and the arena. Nearby, crews removed the tables and yellow patio umbrellas from Trump’s refurbished Rose Garden and were power-washing that space, as well as the colonnade to the Oval Office, in preparation for the fights.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed a cooperation agreement with UFC that will see both institutions provide fight training and health and diet regimens, while promoting teamwork and leadership among youth around the world.

    “We are so polarized,” Rubio said. “There are only a handful of things that bring people together in one place at one time, united by their interest in one thing. We need more of those.”

    Later Thursday, crews began testing the sound system, unleashing a deep rumbling — and sometimes unsettling bass notes — throughout the West Wing. During a subsequent Oval Office event, the music from the lawn was loud enough that the 1970s hit “Boys Are Back in Town” rollicked in the background as Trump spoke.

    Sunday’s event starts at 8 p.m. ET. As darkness falls, crews will illuminate the Claw in red, white, and blue, and the mass of lights will offer projections that make it seem as though the entire structure has been enveloped in a twirling stars and stripes pattern.

    The weather forecast calls for hot and muggy conditions with thunderstorms possible. The underside of the Claw’s tower features an overhead cover that should keep the fighters reasonably dry should it rain — and Trump is also likely to watch from a protected, covered area.

    But everyone else would almost certainly get wet.

    White has vowed that even heavy lightning — when the Claw might make a conspicuous target for bolts — wouldn’t stop the show.

    “I don’t care if it snows,” White said.

  • EU agrees to launch membership talks with Ukraine next week even as war with Russia drags on

    BRUSSELS — European Union nations agreed on Friday to open membership talks with Ukraine next week, officially launching the process for the war-torn country to eventually join the world’s biggest trading bloc.

    At a meeting in Brussels, ambassadors from the 27 EU nations decided to officially open negotiations with Ukraine as well as with Moldova, which Russia has also tried to drag back into its orbit, on Monday in Luxembourg.

    Ukraine sees EU membership as an important “security guarantee” for a stable future once war with Russia ends.

    Its best guarantee would be NATO membership, but the Trump administration insists that cannot happen. Others oppose it joining while fighting continues. Russia is strongly against it, and has cited moves toward NATO membership as a reason for launching its full-scale invasion in 2022, though it has not objected to EU membership for Kyiv.

    Countries hoping to join the EU must complete negotiations in 35 policy areas, or chapters, ranging from agriculture to trade, a process which can take years.

    An intergovernmental conference will be held on Monday to open key chapters — grouped together as “clusters” — concerning the values and principles on which the bloc was founded.

    “This is a recognition of the determination, courage, and hard work shown by both countries in advancing reforms, even in the face of immense challenges,” EU Council President António Costa and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement.

    They described the move as “a strategic choice” that strengthens “peace, security, and prosperity across our continent.” It’s also a “signal that the EU’s offer of peace, stability, and opportunity is unmatchable,” they said.

    Ukraine officially applied for EU accession less than a week after Russia invaded in February 2022. The EU commission has praised the country for reforms it has been able to push through in wartime, although deep concerns about corruption and justice standards remain.

    Last month, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz urged his EU partners to consider offering “associate membership” to Ukraine and breathe new life into talks aimed at ending more than four years of war with Russia.

    Other countries — France and the Netherlands among them — have suggested workarounds to bring Ukraine into the fold more quickly but without the rights of full membership.

    It all comes as the EU weighs whether to try to launch its own negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, with U.S.-mediated talks bogged down while America’s attention focuses on the Iran war.

    Under Merz’s proposals, Ukraine would take part in EU meetings, but without voting rights, and would also have nonvoting “associate members” of the bloc’s powerful executive branch, the European Commission, and the European Parliament.

    All 27 EU members must agree before each policy chapter can be opened, and then again for it to be closed. Hungary, notably, has blocked the opening of negotiations, but the arrival of a new government in Budapest has softened that stance.

  • Tortorella’s confidence unshaken as Golden Knights face elimination game in Stanley Cup Final

    RALEIGH, N.C. — John Tortorella has never worried about how his Vegas Golden Knights handle tough situations in pushing to the Stanley Cup Final.

    That won’t change now, with the Golden Knights facing their first elimination game and dealing with an injury to center William Karlsson.

    The Golden Knights lost 4-2 to the Carolina Hurricanes in Thursday’s Game 5, moving the Hurricanes within a victory of claiming the Stanley Cup. The series shifts to Las Vegas for Sunday’s Game 6 (8 p.m., 6abc), with the Golden Knights aiming to force a Game 7 back here Wednesday.

    “They’ve been through it all,” Tortorella said in a Zoom news conference Friday morning. ”They know what’s at stake here. We need to win one game. They’ll be ready to play.”

    Vegas — featuring numerous holdovers from the team that raised the Cup in 2023 — had only gained momentum since the abrupt firing of coach Bruce Cassidy in late March to hire Tortorella, who coached the Flyers for nearly three seasons.

    The Golden Knights won seven of eight to close the regular season. They faced 2-2 playoff series in Round 1 against Utah and Round 2 against Anaheim, and won Games 5 and 6 to close out each. They swept the Presidents’ Trophy-winning Colorado Avalanche. And they held a 2-1 lead on Carolina after a double-overtime victory in Game 3.

    But the Hurricanes have gradually begun to turn the series.

    Since trailing 4-0 entering the third period of Game 3, the Hurricanes have doubled up the Golden Knights (13-6) while finding a spark with Brandon Bussi taking over in net. In Game 5, the Hurricanes got two more power-play goals from a unit that had sputtered through the Eastern Conference playoffs while also reversing Vegas’ second-period dominance.

    Vegas had compounding mistakes like getting a kill only for Brayden McNabb to immediately go to the box for cross-checking Jackson Blake in the second period. Or there was Mark Stone’s high stick on Jalen Chatfield in the third, leaving Chatfield bleeding from a cut above his right eye for a double-minor penalty.

    Carolina’s Andrei Svechnikov scored after both, coming amid a postseason of questions as to when he and fellow topliner Sebastian Aho would get rolling.

    “Anytime you give the other team’s best players the opportunity to be on the ice on the power play and feel good about themselves … you stack that up and it definitely can be challenging and tire guys out,” center Nic Dowd said afterward.

    Svechnikov’s scores pushed the Hurricanes to 6 of 16 (37.5%) on the power play this series, coming after they were at 12.5% (7 of 56) in a 12-1 push through the Eastern Conference playoffs.

    “One of the areas that we’ve lost a little bit is special teams, a couple of power-play goals last night,” Tortorella said Friday. “Like I said after the game, I thought at times we were killing, we had some good times as far as moving, being aggressive with our penalty kill, and are doing the job. Other times, not so good.”

    Then there’s Karlsson, who missed nearly six months with a lower-body injury before returning for his playoff debut to start the Anaheim series. He had three goals and six assists through 14 playoff games to elevate the Golden Knights, including goals in Games 1 and 4 against Carolina.

    But Karlsson appeared to injure his left arm or shoulder after getting knocked into the boards by Hurricanes defenseman Sean Walker midway through the second. He got medical attention on the bench briefly, skated off, and never returned.

    Tortorella said Thursday that Karlsson was “not going to be with us, probably” and Vegas needed a collective effort to replace him. He offered no additional details Friday morning.

    Still, he has defiantly promised the series would “be back here” for a Game 7.

    “We know what we have to do to beat this team,” McNabb said Thursday night. ”It’s a matter of going home and winning one game. That’s all it is, and hopefully we’re back here for Game 7.”

  • Blocking Trump’s Fund, Judge Presses for Guarantee It Won’t Move Forward

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A federal judge Friday barred the Trump administration until further notice from setting up a $1.8 billion fund to compensate people claiming to have been unfairly prosecuted by the government, saying that her order was needed because of mixed messages about the scheme from President Donald Trump.

    The ruling by the judge, Leonie M. Brinkema, was the strongest effort to date by anyone in government to hold the administration to its word that the proposal to create the fund had actually been set aside. While Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, told Congress last week that the fund would not move forward, Trump has been much more circumspect, insisting that he still loves the idea and believes that people who suffered in court at the hands of the government should get financial compensation.

    Brinkema seized on the president’s statements during a hearing in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va., suggesting they left open the possibility that the fund could be brought back to life despite Blanche’s promises and assertions made in court papers that the fund was no longer moving forward.

    “We just don’t have the absolute certainty that this fund won’t rear its head in another form,” she said.

    Brinkema did, however, give the administration a way out. She said she would consider rescinding her order if, within a week, the Justice Department sent her a declaration, filed under penalty of perjury, that the fund was dead once and for all. She told Andrew Block, a department lawyer who appeared in court for the government, that the declaration needed to be signed by Blanche and Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary.

    Brinkema’s ruling extended a temporary pause on the fund that she had put in place at the end of May. And it came two days after a federal judge in Washington, Richard J. Leon, refused to issue his own order putting the fund on hold.

    Leon took the Justice Department at its word that the plan had been shelved, but still warned the administration not to play games with him by pretending it was dead, if it was not.

    “Don’t play possum with this court,” he said.

    The fund has created a political headache for the White House almost from the moment it was first announced May 18 — in no small measure because of concerns that it could be used to funnel taxpayer money to hundreds of rioters prosecuted for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    Brinkema underscored those concerns by reading aloud a passage about payments being made to the rioters that appeared in a brief criticizing the fund that was submitted to her last week by Sens. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) and Bill Cassidy (R., La.).

    “A scheme deliberately designed to recast insurrectionists — including those who perpetrated violence against law enforcement officers — as victims and legitimate prosecutions as persecution does not merely rewrite history,” the judge read from the bench. “It creates incentives for similar conduct in the future, with the explicit encouragement of the officials responsible for administering justice.”

    The lawyers who challenged the administration in front of Brinkema celebrated her order, saying it would keep the fund in check, despite “the administration’s shifting explanations” about its future.

    “The court recognized the serious legal concerns raised by the Trump-Vance administration’s attempt to create a secretive, taxpayer-funded compensation program operating outside the constitutional safeguards that govern public spending,” said Skye Perryman, the president and CEO of Democracy Forward.

    The nonprofit group brought the case on behalf of five clients — among them, a former federal prosecutor fired after working on Jan. 6-related cases — who asserted that they had been wronged by the Trump administration and would be prevented from filing claims with the fund because it was designed to compensate people alleging harm by Democratic administrations.

    The fund emerged from an extraordinarily unusual ploy to settle a $10 billion lawsuit that Trump had filed against the IRS, a federal agency that he technically controls. The suit accused the IRS of not doing enough to stop a contractor from leaking his tax information to the New York Times in 2019.

    As part of the same deal, the IRS and the Justice Department gave the president an even more remarkable and personal benefit, granting him, his family, and businesses broad protections from tax investigations.

    Brinkema made clear Friday that her order applied only to the compensation fund, not to the tax provision. She noted that the entire settlement deal — including both the fund and the IRS protections — was being scrutinized as a potential act of fraud by the federal judge in Miami, Kathleen M. Williams, who oversaw the original lawsuit.

    Shortly after being assigned the IRS suit, Williams, an Obama appointee, had questioned whether it presented an actual conflict that she could consider, given that Trump was effectively on both sides of the matter. When she closed the case, she noted that there was no “settlement of record,” but shortly after, the Justice Department released its agreement dismissing the suit.

    Williams effectively reopened the case last month after 35 former federal judges urged her to examine whether Trump’s legal team and the Justice Department had colluded to reach the deal in a way that avoided any scrutiny or oversight.

    As part of her inquiry, Williams has given Trump’s personal lawyers until the end of Friday to tell her in writing whether the dismissal of the suit was “premised on deception” and whether it should be formally reopened because she was the “victim of a fraud.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • Elon Musk becomes the world’s first trillionaire

    Elon Musk becomes the world’s first trillionaire

    Elon Musk became the world’s first trillionaire Friday when shares of his rocket company SpaceX began trading on the stock market, signaling a new era of ultra-affluence and widening wealth inequality.

    Musk reached the milestone when trading of SpaceX shares opened at $150, up 11% from their initial public offering price of $135. His net worth — which comprises his stock in SpaceX and his electric carmaker, Tesla, as well as ownership stakes in other ventures including brain implant company Neuralink and tunneling firm the Boring Co. — stood at around $1.1 trillion.

    Musk, 54, was already the world’s richest person. He claimed that title from Amazon founder Jeff Bezos in January 2021, after Tesla’s shares surged to take his net worth past $185 billion.

    Since then, the South African-born entrepreneur’s fortune has more than quintupled in a 5½-year period, during which he bought social media company Twitter, founded an AI startup, fused them together with SpaceX, and then took the conglomerate public. In that time, Musk also spent more than $250 million to help elect Donald Trump and advised the president.

    And Musk’s wealth-making has only accelerated, cementing his influence over society, culture, and global politics. Since October, his net worth has doubled.

    “The fact is that wealth for some and wealth inequality is growing in dimensions that we’ve never seen before,” said Steven Durlauf, the director of the Stone Center for Research on Wealth Inequality and Mobility at the University of Chicago.

    When oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller’s fortune was at its height in 1937, his $1.4 billion net worth amounted to about 1.5% of U.S. gross domestic product, Durlauf said. Musk’s net worth is now equivalent to more than 3% of U.S. GDP.

    Such wealth is so extraordinary that it can be hard to make meaningful comparisons. The median American household had a net worth of just under $200,000 in 2022, the year with the most recent data available from the Federal Reserve. That means Musk’s net worth is 5 million times as large as that of the typical family.

    His wealth dwarfs even that of the everyday wealthy. The top 10% of households by income had an average net worth of $6.5 million in 2022, less than 0.001% of the SpaceX leader’s total. The world’s second-richest person, Google co-founder Larry Page, is worth around $304 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

    Inequality is notoriously difficult to measure, but the explosion of wealth at the top is hard to dispute. The net worth of the middle 40% of households, adjusted for inflation, has risen slightly more than 50% over the past decade, according to data from French economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman. The top 1% have seen similar gains. But the richest 0.001% have seen their wealth roughly double over the same period.

    Beyond Musk, the ultrawealthy have experienced significant increases in their fortunes. In 2016, a net worth of $100 billion — a mark that Musk crossed about six years ago — would have easily placed someone at the top of the Forbes Billionaires list. Today, $100 billion would rank them as the 20th richest person in the world.

    “Christ, when I was a kid, we only talked about millionaires,” said Bernie Sanders, 84, the progressive senator from Vermont. “If this isn’t an example of oligarchy, I don’t know what is.”

    Musk’s rapid accumulation of wealth largely comes down to the appreciation of his nearly 50% stake in SpaceX, which is worth more than $900 billion. During its IPO, the company sold more than 555 million shares, which valued it at $1.77 trillion, up from a $400 billion valuation on the private market last summer. Starting in January, SpaceX also granted Musk pay packages totaling 1.3 billion shares, which he cannot sell until he hits certain operational milestones.

    Musk did not respond to a request for comment. But he has previously acknowledged the trillionaire milestone.

    In February, he replied to a post on X about possible trillionaire status by noting that he had created significant wealth for shareholders and held less than 0.1% of his net worth in cash. In May, he responded on X to the financial musings of Peter Diamandis, a friend and SpaceX investor, saying he would reach “$10T or bust.”

    Musk has also recently said that “money won’t matter” in the future because Tesla and SpaceX would develop robotics, AI, and rockets so powerful that no human would ever have to work again. In his utopian world of “amazing abundance,” everyone would have “universal high income,” he has said.

    Musk’s allies said his net worth was justified by his impact, providing an example and incentive for those who want to build successful companies. Diamandis, the head of the XPrize Foundation, an organization that holds contests to encourage scientific breakthroughs, said Tesla and SpaceX were “raising the floor.”

    “The fruits of his labor are making him into a trillionaire, and they’re uplifting humanity,” Diamandis said.

    Adeo Ressi, Musk’s college roommate at the University of Pennsylvania, said the SpaceX chief never cared as much about financial gain as obtaining resources to help him achieve his entrepreneurial goals. For Musk, “money is a means to an end,” Ressi said, comparing his friend’s mindset with a gamer accumulating coins in a video game to beat a level.

    “He’s amassing resources to do things, and the thing he wants to do most is colonize Mars,” Ressi said. “That’s a really big driving force behind his wealth accumulation.”

    He added that Musk was “not a poster child of wealth inequality” and pointed to the tech leader’s lifestyle, in which he is known to work around the clock and avoid the typical trappings of the rich, like islands and megayachts.

    “It’s not like he’s planning to leave this in a massive family trust,” Ressi said. “It’s literally going to be used to make humanity into a multiplanetary species.”

    But critics say the way Musk chooses to lead his life is beside the point. His net worth has already provided him with the means to personally acquire companies and spend hundreds of millions of dollars to help elect a preferred presidential candidate, Durlauf of the University of Chicago said.

    Becoming a trillionaire will only magnify how “economic inequalities are spilling over into the political domain,” he added.

    Sanders called Musk’s trillionaire status “a moral travesty,” noting that 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck.

    The senator also agreed with the assessment that Musk was probably not as interested in owning islands or yachts. The trillionaire, in his view, was interested in just one thing.

    “This guy is into power,” Sanders said. “And he is now the most powerful person on Earth.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

    FILE — Elon Musk in Washington on Nov. 19, 2025. Elon Musk became the world’s first trillionaire on June 11, 2026, as shares of his rocket company SpaceX began trading on the stock market at $150, up 11 percent from their initial public offering price, signaling a new era of ultra-affluence and widening wealth inequality. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)HAIYUN JIANG
    FILE — The SpaceX Starbase rocket launch site near Boca Chica beach, in Cameron County, Texas, on Feb. 24, 2024. Elon Musk became the world’s first trillionaire on June 11, 2026, as shares of his rocket company SpaceX began trading on the stock market at $150, up 11 percent from their initial public offering price, signaling a new era of ultra-affluence and widening wealth inequality. (Meridith Kohut/The New York Times)MERIDITH KOHUT
  • Judge extends block on Trump’s $1.8 billion ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — A federal judge agreed on Friday to extend a court-ordered block on the Trump administration’s creation and operation of a $1.8 billion settlement fund for compensating people who claim to be victims of a weaponized government.

    Earlier this month, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told Congress that the government is scrapping its plans for the fund in the face of a fierce bipartisan backlash. Government attorneys have argued that lawsuits challenging the fund are now moot, but plaintiffs’ attorneys aren’t satisfied by Blanche’s assurances that the fund won’t move forward.

    Neither was U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, who ruled that the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” will remain blocked until further notice from the court.

    “The (government’s) mootness argument, in my view, doesn’t go anywhere,” the judge said.

    President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has not publicly and unequivocally endorsed its cancellation. He has continued to express support for the fund in remarks to reporters.

    Brinkema gave the parties a week to negotiate an agreement for Blanche to submit a sworn declaration that the administration won’t revive the fund.

    Brinkema previously agreed to temporarily block the administration from proceeding with the fund for at least two weeks. Her May 29 order was due to expire on Friday.

    Trump’s Republican administration created the fund to resolve his lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

    Plaintiffs who sued to block fund payouts argue that the government can’t legally divert taxpayer money into what they argue is a slush fund for compensating Trump’s allies.

    In a separate case on Wednesday, a different judge in Washington, D.C., rejected a government watchdog’s parallel request for a court order temporarily blocking the Trump administration from forging ahead with the fund. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon said he accepts Blanche’s representation that the fund is now moot.

    Leon had asked Justice Department attorney Andrew Block why Blanche doesn’t formally rescind his May 18 order establishing the fund. Block said he didn’t know. He still didn’t have an answer to that question when Brinkema posed it two days later.

    “It’s a huge gap in the record that we don’t have an answer to that question,” the judge said.

    In the Virginia case, attorneys from the legal advocacy group Democracy Forward asked for an order to temporarily suspend the fund’s implementation and stop the Trump administration from disbursing any payouts from it.

    The plaintiffs include a fired prosecutor and a college professor acquitted of assaulting federal agents at a protest.

    Even before the administration said it was dropping the fund, the Justice Department did not form the five-member commission that would decide on payout criteria, so no money was paid out nor claims accepted.

    Many of the Republican president’s allies are opposed to compensating rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. In May, however, Blanche wouldn’t rule out the possibility that Capitol rioters who engaged could be eligible to apply for payments from the fund.

    Trump issued mass pardons to Capitol rioters on his first day back in the White House last year. More than 1,500 people were charged in the Jan. 6 attack before Trump erased every case with his sweeping act of clemency.

    Brinkema was nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat.