Tag: no-latest

  • Former Senate leader Mitch McConnell is in the hospital, but little more information is known

    WASHINGTON — Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell was admitted to a hospital Sunday, his spokesperson said, but there was no immediate information about why he was there or his prognosis.

    McConnell, 84, was the longest serving Senate leader in history before stepping aside from that role while finishing his final term, which ends in January.

    “Senator McConnell was admitted to the hospital this morning. He is receiving excellent care,” spokesperson David Popp said in a statement without elaboration. It was not immediately clear whether the Kentucky lawmaker was in Washington, his home state, or elsewhere.

    McConnell’s health has been a subject of scrutiny for years.

    He fell and sprained his wrist while walking out of a GOP luncheon in December 2024. He was hospitalized with a concussion in March 2023 and missed several weeks of work after falling in a Washington hotel. After he returned, he twice froze up during news conferences that summer, staring vacantly ahead before colleagues and staff came to his assistance.

    McConnell had polio in his early childhood and he has long acknowledged some difficulty as an adult in walking and climbing stairs. In addition to his 2023 fall, he also tripped and fell in 2019 at his home in Kentucky. He had surgery for a fractured shoulder.

    McConnell was first elected to the Senate in 1984 and was the Republican leader from 2007 until last year, serving as both majority and minority leader during that period.

    He remains active in the Senate, showing up for work when the chamber is in session, and recently chairing public hearings and grilling officials from his perch as the chairperson for the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on defense. He has intermittently used a wheelchair to navigate the Capitol and routinely has his security detail, as a former congressional leader, at his side.

  • Britain detains sanctioned oil tanker believed to be linked to Russia’s shadow fleet

    LONDON — Armed British forces boarded and detained a sanctioned tanker Sunday that is suspected of being part of the Russian “shadow fleet,” shipping oil in violation of international sanctions over Moscow’s war on Ukraine, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Sunday.

    Royal Marine commandos rappelled from helicopters onto the vessel, the Smyrtos, in the English Channel, in what the country’s Defense Ministry called “the first U.K.-led operation of its kind.”

    The vessel will be held and monitored off the south coast of England for investigation, according to the Defense Ministry. The operation was carried out “in close coordination” with French authorities, who have previously intercepted a number of vessels linked to the shadow fleet.

    “This operation delivers yet another blow to Russia and reminds those fueling Putin’s war in Ukraine that they cannot hide,” Starmer said.

    Russia is believed to be using a fleet of hundreds of ships to evade sanctions over its war against Ukraine.

    Sailing under a Cameroon flag, the Smyrtos left the Russian Baltic port of Ust-Luga on June 5 destined for Port Said, Egypt, according to the MarineTraffic website.

    U.K. authorities said that such operations were “directly bearing down on the resources sustaining Russia’s aggression in Ukraine and reducing its capacity to threaten security across Europe and beyond.”

    Ukraine President Voldymyr Zelensky thanked Starmer and the British people for their “principled resolve.”

    “It was Russia’s hubris, fueled by high oil and gas revenues, that paved the way for this war, and every decision by partners that deprives Russia of money also limits the war itself,” Zelensky said on X.

    “Europe urgently needs to take legislative steps to enable not only the detention of tankers and restrictions on oil shipments, but also the confiscation of the oil they carry.”

  • Palestinian death toll in Gaza tops 73,000 as Israel launches strikes despite ceasefire

    DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip — The Palestinian death toll from the Israel-Hamas war has surpassed 73,000, Gaza’s Health Ministry said Sunday, as Israeli military operations continued despite a stalled and fragile ceasefire in place since October.

    Israel says it is targeting Hamas and other militants who pose a threat, and responding to ceasefire violations, including occasional attacks.

    Nearly 1,000 people have been killed in Gaza since the start of the ceasefire, according to the health ministry. Five Israeli soldiers have been killed since the truce.

    The number of deaths since the beginning of the war is now 73,001, according to the health ministry’s tally. Over 173,200 people have been wounded since the start of the war on Oct. 7, 2023, following the Hamas-led attack into Israel. That attack killed some 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage.

    The health ministry, part of the Hamas-led government, is staffed by medical professionals and maintains detailed records viewed as generally reliable by United Nations agencies and independent experts. It does not distinguish between civilians and militants but says women and children make up around half of all fatalities.

    Israel says it tries to avoid harming civilians and blames their deaths on Hamas because the militants operate in densely populated areas.

    Stalled ceasefire

    The U.S.-brokered ceasefire deal reached in October ended full-scale military operations and led to the return of all the remaining hostages. But other elements of the deal have stalled as Hamas has refused to disarm and Israeli troops have advanced in Gaza, rather than withdrawn. Both sides accuse the other of violating the agreement but say it is still in effect.

    Progress on all other issues — including reconstruction, Israeli troop withdrawals, and the establishment of a new Palestinian government — is being held up by the deadlock over disarming Hamas, the top diplomat overseeing the U.S.-brokered ceasefire in Gaza, Nickolay Mladenov, has said.

    The war displaced most of the Palestinian population of over 2 million, left large parts of the territory in rubble and created widespread shortages of food, medicine, and other basic supplies as the border crossings with Gaza — all but one controlled by Israel — slammed shut.

    At least eight more Palestinians killed in the weekend

    An Israeli strike on Sunday afternoon in northern Gaza’s Jabaliya refugee camp killed at least four people and wounded others, according to health officials at the Shifa hospital, where the casualties were taken. An Israeli military official, who spoke anonymously in line with military guidelines, said the military “struck terrorists” in the area, without elaborating.

    A 13-year-old boy was among five Palestinians killed in Gaza on Saturday night and into the early hours of Sunday, according to Palestinian health officials. In response to the Saturday night strike that killed two of the five, the Israeli military claimed that it was striking Hamas militants.

  • Trump administration reignites its feud with Anthropic over latest AI models

    Trump administration reignites its feud with Anthropic over latest AI models

    WASHINGTON — The feud between Anthropic and the Trump administration escalated again Saturday after the government took the unusual step a day earlier of demanding that the artificial intelligence company cut off foreign access to its latest models, as top officials suggested the dispute was unlikely to resolve quickly.

    Late on Friday, Anthropic disclosed in a blog post that it had disabled access for all customers to its most advanced AI systems, known as Fable 5 and Mythos 5, after receiving a directive from the administration to suspend access to any foreign national. The move shocked former U.S. officials and cybersecurity experts, many of whom questioned the validity of the action and noted that it diverged from the hands-off approach to policing the booming AI industry that President Donald Trump had endorsed earlier this month.

    Anthropic said the directive did not explain the national security concerns that prompted it. But the company added that the government had said that it became aware of a method to “jailbreak,” or bypass, security restrictions on Fable 5 intended to limit a customer’s ability to abuse the product for hacking or other potential harms. Anthropic countered that the fears about the jailbreak method were overblown.

    The announcement inflamed tensions between the Trump administration and Anthropic, which earlier this month confidentially filed for an initial public offering following a funding round valuing it at nearly $1 trillion. The two sides have sparred for months over how Anthropic’s AI systems could be used in military and intelligence settings, culminating with the Pentagon labeling the company a supply-chain risk.

    On Saturday, top Trump administration officials and allies of Trump’s stepped up their attacks on Anthropic.

    “Three months ago, @DeptofWar kicked @AnthropicAI out of our building — forever,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on the social platform X. “Every passing day proves why that was the right move.”

    David Sacks, a venture capitalist who until recently worked in the administration as an AI czar, accused Anthropic in a lengthy social media post Saturday of being reckless with the release of its latest model, dubbed Fable 5.

    Sacks, who said he had spoken to many people inside and outside the administration about the directive, said the administration had asked Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, to fix the jailbreak issue after a “highly credible trusted partner” of Anthropic’s and the government’s came forward with research.

    “Dario refused,” Sacks said.

    A person briefed on Amodei’s conversations disputed the account, saying that Anthropic was happy to discuss the concerns.

    Sacks did not name the “trusted partner” he referred to in his post. But multiple technology firms, including Amazon, spoke with the White House about the security issues, according to people familiar with the matter. Several of the people said a message from Amazon’s CEO, Andy Jassy, detailing security issues was the most influential, raising concerns about the capabilities of the new Anthropic model.

    But several of these officials said a separate document from Amazon explaining the security concerns with Anthropic’s model was misleading. The concerning capabilities that the document highlighted with Anthropic’s model are also present in OpenAI’s top model, 5.5.

    An Amazon spokesperson declined to comment on the exact nature of its discussions with the White House. “It’s not uncommon for governments to seek our counsel on potential security risks,” the spokesperson said. “When they occur, we don’t share the details of these discussions.”

    Administration officials called Anthropic officials at 1:15 p.m. Friday and gave them 90 minutes to pull their most advanced models down, citing an undefined national security concern, according to people briefed on the discussions. Anthropic officials asked for more information and worked to learn what the precise concern was, since the Commerce Department’s review and testing of Fable did not reveal significant concerns.

    Then, at 5:21 p.m., Anthropic was notified that the Trump administration was imposing export controls that effectively forced the company to pull down its model, which consumers had just begun to have access to.

    Discussions about resolving the dispute are continuing. Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, spoke to Anthropic officials Friday, and was set to have another session with senior company officials Saturday evening, according to people briefed on the discussions and plans.

    Some experts said the Trump administration was either misunderstanding or deliberately misconstruing what transpired. Katie Moussouris, the CEO of Luta Security, said on social media that she had seen the research paper that prompted the administration’s actions.

    “It’s not a jailbreak,” she said, but rather a defensive maneuver designed to limit the misuse of a model. “If national defense is the goal, this is an own goal.”

    Earlier this month, the Trump administration issued an executive order that asked technology companies to voluntarily let the government review their new models before releasing them to the public. But it did not give the government an official role in approving their release.

    The order had been delayed after a fierce debate in which AI companies — and some sympathetic government officials — had pushed back against the government interfering in model deployment. The dispute came on the heels of Anthropic’s very limited release of Mythos, an AI model so good at discovering and weaponizing new cybersecurity vulnerabilities that it sparked widespread concerns about its potential to wreak havoc.

    The new restrictions on Anthropic have raised questions about the implications for other AI models that may have similar capabilities. Former officials and technology experts said the administration did not appear to have thought through the longer-term ramifications of such a move.

    But the measure could be limited to Anthropic, which received a fusillade of attacks from the administration in recent months.

    In February, amid the Pentagon’s clash with Anthropic, Trump called the company a “radical left, woke company” and “Leftwing nut jobs” working to dictate how the government wins and fights wars.

    “I am directing EVERY Federal Agency in the United States Government to IMMEDIATELY CEASE all use of Anthropic’s technology,” the president wrote on social media. “We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again!”

    Some administration officials have in recent weeks been looking for an off-ramp in the dispute, U.S. officials say. White House and intelligence officials have pushed forward a classified contract between Anthropic and the National Security Agency, which would allow the spy agency to use the company’s technology for a variety of purposes, including intelligence analysis and detecting new computer vulnerabilities.

    Officials at the NSA, which is responsible for digital eavesdropping and government cybersecurity, were not involved in Friday’s decision, according to people familiar with the matter.

    Many U.S. officials said the new technology Anthropic had developed was too important to national security to allow the dispute with the Pentagon to block cooperation. But inside the top ranks of the Pentagon, officials remain upset with the company, insisting that the firm sign on to the same contractual provisions that other AI companies have embraced.

    In a June 12 letter viewed by the New York Times, Lutnick told Amodei that a special license would be required for the company to distribute its Mythos and Fable 5 models “to all destinations worldwide,” as well as to share them with non-U.S. citizens.

    “Failure to comply will result in prompt criminal and civil penalties, as provided for by law,” Lutnick wrote.

    The government has controlled AI models before, but past restrictions were more targeted. A measure introduced early last year by the Biden administration placed restrictions on companies’ ability to export the so-called weights for specific AI models — the proprietary numerical values that tell the model how much importance to place on different pieces of data.

    The measure taken by the Trump administration goes far beyond that, by barring Anthropic from sharing the model with any foreign country or any foreign national without first obtaining a license.

    The restrictions on the involvement of foreign nationals, even those with green cards, could be particularly chilling in an industry that relies on foreign talent. In the past, government officials have often reserved that type of restriction for the most sensitive technologies, like weapons systems.

    Chris McGuire, a former Biden administration technology official who is now a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that the administration’s current policy is that AI chips can be exported to China, but Canadian green card holders in the United States cannot access leading U.S. models.

    “That’s absurd,” he added.

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • Putin, Zelensky speak with Trump by phone as drone strikes kill 2 in Russia

    Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky each spoke by phone with U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday, as Trump marked his 80th birthday and the war in Ukraine remained a flashpoint ahead of this week’s G7 summit.

    Putin’s call with Trump lasted just under an hour, according to Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov, who briefed reporters afterward.

    On Ukraine, Ushakov said Trump emphasized the need to end hostilities and stated his readiness to influence European allies and Kyiv toward that goal, including at the upcoming G7 summit.

    Trump also said that recent strikes on civilian targets in Russia complicate a settlement — though the White House has not confirmed that, nor commented on the call — and said that ending the war quickly could open the door to “a truly new quality of U.S.-Russian relations,” Ushakov quoted him as saying.

    Putin, for his part, argued that attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure by Kyiv would not change Ukraine’s position on the battlefield, and said that if Zelensky wants a meeting with him, “let him come to Moscow,” according to Ushakov.

    U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner are expected to travel to Russia soon, Ushakov said.

    The leaders also discussed Iran, where Trump said a U.S. agreement with Tehran was close and that he hoped the results of the talks could be made public Sunday, Ushakov said.

    Zelensky said in a statement on Telegram Sunday that he had a “wonderful conversation” with Trump.

    Beyond congratulating Trump on his birthday, the Ukrainian president said he thanked the U.S. president for supporting Ukraine.

    He said they discussed “what could help bring peace closer now,” without providing details. Zelensky also informed Trump about how Ukraine’s position along the eastern front line has improved and strengthened.

    “We agreed to discuss more during our meeting at the G7 summit,” he said.

    The calls came as Trump prepared to mark his birthday with a UFC fight on the White House lawn Sunday evening, an event without precedent in American history. Once it concludes, Trumpwas set to fly overnight to France for the G7 summit, where Ukraine is expected to be a major topic of discussion Tuesday and Zelensky is due to join the gathering.

    Russia’s war in Ukraine has long frustrated Trump, who as a candidate claimed he could end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office. He has since stopped making such claims and tends to pivot away from the topic when pressed. He has also grown increasingly vexed by the war between Israel and Iran, which has driven up gas prices, rattled financial markets, and stoked concerns about inflation.

    The diplomatic exchanges came against the backdrop of continued fighting. Ukrainian drone attacks killed one person and wounded nine others overnight in a residential building in the regional capital of Russia’s Oryol region, Gov. Andrei Klychkov said Sunday. Another drone attack killed one person Sunday in Russia’s Bryansk region, local authorities said.

    A separate drone strike hit fuel storage facilities in Russia’s Yaroslavl region, around 440 miles from the Ukrainian border, sparking fires. Zelensky said the strike had hit “an oil facility that was important for the reserve of the aggressor state.”

    Ukraine has stepped up attacks on Russian oil and gas infrastructure in recent months, arguing the sector funds Moscow’s invasion.

  • Sports betting was once widely outlawed. Now it’s promoted at the White House.

    Sports betting was once widely outlawed. Now it’s promoted at the White House.

    The walls of the eight-sided cage where fighters will pummel each other Sunday on the South Lawn of the White House were plastered with logos for Polymarket, the prediction market where traders had staked millions on the fights.

    Across sportsbooks, fans are placing bets on whether President Donald Trump will receive a birthday cake at the event, whether first lady Melania Trump will appear at his side, or whether the now-80-year-old president will fall asleep during a bout.

    Less than a decade ago, wagering on a sporting event was a crime in all but a handful of states. On Sunday, the mat of the octagon Trump ordered placed on White House grounds advertised for Stake, a Caribbean-based online casino and sportsbook.

    Welcome to UFC Freedom 250 — and to the latest improbable milestone in the transformation of betting from a shadowy, mostly illegal pastime into a mainstream force in American sports, culture, and politics.

    The event marks a triumph for an industry that has grown into a multibillion-dollar juggernaut in eight years — and is now expanding beyond sports through prediction markets such as Polymarket, which allow users to wager on everything from Ultimate Fighting Championship fights to election contests and more. But the industry’s embrace by the White House comes as lawmakers and regulators face the consequences of an explosion in legal gambling, including addiction and mounting consumer debt.

    “Right now it’s certainly in its heyday,” said Bradley Tusk, a political strategist who helped FanDuel navigate gambling laws more than a decade ago and is now advising prediction markets.

    Trump, a former Atlantic City casino owner, has emerged as a natural ally for the sports betting and prediction market industries. He purchased $35,000 to $50,000 of stock in DraftKings earlier this year, according to his financial disclosure filings, and his social media company, Truth Social, also has said it is working with Crypto.com to launch its own prediction market, Truth Predict. Crypto.com’s logo appeared on the steps to the UFC cage, and it was a primary sponsor of the Sunday fights.

    In April, Trump said that he was “never much in favor” of prediction markets but later told reporters, “A lot of other countries are doing it, and when the other countries do it, we get left out in the cold if we don’t do it.”

    “I know people that are in the prediction market business, and they’re pretty happy with it,” he added. Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. has invested in Polymarket through his venture capital firm, and he has advised both Polymarket and Kalshi.

    Trump “sort of embodies the casino capitalism of the late 20th and early 21st century,” said Jonathan D. Cohen, who leads gambling policy at the American Institute for Boys and Men. “It makes too much sense that his family would have personal investments in the prediction markets and support the rise of gambling on everything, and place a UFC fight on the White House lawn.”

    The White House said in a statement that the Trump family’s investments do not pose a conflict of interest, promising that the UFC fights would be “one of the greatest and most historic sports events in history.”

    “President Trump only acts in the best interests of the American public — which is why they overwhelmingly reelected him to this office, despite years of lies and false accusations against him and his businesses,” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said. “President Trump’s assets are in a trust managed by his children.”

    UFC and Stake did not respond to requests for comment. Polymarket said in a statement that it was “proud to sponsor” the White House fight.

    The White House fights were not expected to generate an unusual volume of betting for UFC matches, said Chris Grove, partner emeritus at Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, a research firm focused on the global gambling industry. He anticipated that the total volume of wagers and trades would be measured in the tens of millions, rather than the hundreds of millions — far smaller than for major sports betting events such as the Super Bowl or FIFA World Cup.

    But the event’s role as a billboard for the betting industry has attracted criticism.

    “It’s an abomination that we have these sports betting markets sponsoring something that’s happening on the lawn of the chief executive officer of the United States,” said Joel Griffith, a senior fellow at Advancing American Freedom, a conservative think tank founded by former Vice President Mike Pence. “It shows that there’s a lot of money to be made in this business. Unfortunately, [sports betting] is harming Americans.”

    Griffith also said he’s “deeply troubled” by the potential conflicts of interest posed by the president’s investments in betting markets and in UFC while hosting an event that advertises both businesses.

    Congress advanced bipartisan legislation in 1992 that outlawed sports betting in every state except Nevada, highlighting how politically unpopular it once was to support the practice. Oregon, Delaware, and Montana had limited carve-outs.

    But since the Supreme Court struck down that law in 2018, 39 states have legalized sports betting, and bettors have wagered more than $650 billion, according to estimates from Legal Sports Report. The decision enabled the rise of companies such as FanDuel and DraftKings, which allowed people to bet on games directly from their cellphones.

    Internet searches for help with gambling addiction, such as “am I addicted to gambling,” have cumulatively increased 23% nationally since the 2018 Supreme Court decision, according to 2025 research from the University of California at San Diego Qualcomm Institute and School of Medicine.

    The rise of prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket also has provided a new avenue for people to bet. Combined monthly global trading volume on the platforms has risen from less than $5 billion in September 2025 to about $24 billion in April 2026, according to Pew Research Center’s analysis of data from the Block, a digital assets media and information firm.

    The administration proposed new regulations for prediction markets Wednesday that are aimed at allowing most wagering, while restricting bets that are particularly vulnerable to manipulation and those that aren’t in the public interest, such as bets related to terrorism, assassination, or war.

    Multiple lawmakers have proposed bills that would regulate prediction markets. One from Sens. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.) and John Curtis (R., Utah) would bar prediction markets from offering sports betting, which they argue circumvents state gaming laws and legalizes sports betting nationwide.

    The administration’s proposed rule is “a backdoor for legalized sports gambling,” Schiff said in a statement, adding, “the sight of profiteering and gambling on the White House lawn in celebration of [Trump’s] birthday is problematic enough, we must ensure it is not compounded by insider trading and other conflicts of interest.”

    Other proposals would regulate the markets and ban elected officials from trading on them, or ban betting on sensitive events such as war, terrorism, and elections as well as sports.

    Lawmakers in Congress also are trying to rein in their own access to prediction markets, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and insider trading. The Senate passed a resolution in April prohibiting senators and staff from using prediction markets, and Rep. Bryan Steil (R., Wisc.) is working on legislation to ban current and former members and candidates from betting on political events.

    But such legislation faces an uncertain future as long as Trump is in the White House and holds veto power.

    “There’s lots of concern from both sides of the aisle about prediction markets, but there’s also this gnawing sense that the White House will block any attempt to rein them in,” said Cohen, who also wrote Losing Big: America’s Reckless Bet on Sports Gambling. “It’s going to get bigger before it gets smaller.”

  • The NBA’s Wemby era is clearly underway. But he’s still waiting for his first NBA title

    SAN ANTONIO — Victor Wembanyama had to watch the visiting team become champions, again.

    The Wemby era of the NBA is fully underway, with the 7-foot-4 French star unanimously winning the Defensive Player of the Year award this season, finishing third in the Most Valuable Player balloting and making first-team All-NBA for the first of what could be many, many times if all goes according to his plan.

    But the ultimate moment has escaped his grasp for the second time in three years. In 2024, he tearfully watched the U.S. celebrate winning Olympic gold at the Paris Olympics — and now, he relived that moment by seeing the New York Knicks celebrating their first championship in 53 years by winning Game 5 of the NBA Finals in San Antonio on Saturday night.

    “This is the biggest lesson of my life, the biggest learning moment,” the 22-year-old Wembanyama said. “I can’t tell you exactly what the lesson is, but we’re learning from that, for sure. I’m learning more than any other time in my life before.”

    His numbers in the finals: 26 points, 11.2 rebounds. 3.6 blocks per game. They were good, just not good enough.

    And his series, fairly or unfairly, will also be remembered for some mistakes: The turnover that led to Jalen Brunson’s go-ahead free throw in New York’s Game 2 win (a game where Wembanyama missed a jump shot to win at the buzzer); and missing a pair of crucial free throws with 1:47 left in Game 4, the one where the Spurs wasted a 29-point lead and lost by one in what became the biggest collapse in finals history. The Spurs wasted double-digit leads in all four losses, including a 16-point cushion in what became the season finale.

    “The margin of error is very thin,” Wembanyama said. “Our domination stints are absolute. We absolutely dominated for most of the series. But our errors, our mistakes, are punished so hard that we can’t have ups and downs like this. … The ups are OK. The downs are the reason we lost.”

    It’s only Year 3 for Wemby. It’s not like every star wins right away.

    It took Michael Jordan seven seasons to win his first championship. LeBron James needed nine years. Jerry West needed 12 years for his one and only title. John Stockton and Karl Malone never got one. Charles Barkley, Chris Paul and Carmelo Anthony didn’t get one, either.

    “He’s definitely the future of this league, man,” Knicks legend Larry Johnson said during the series when asked about Wembanyama. “He’s a heck of a ballplayer.”

    Wembanyama knows the history, knows that it took some of the greatest to ever touch a ball several years to win a title.

    Doesn’t mean he likes it.

    “It’s painful. It’s painful,” Wembanyama said. “But I’m not running away from that. I’m using it to fuel me. … I’m not satisfied with not winning. But as I said, this is the biggest lesson of my life. As a team, there’s no better experience than what we just lived.”

    His numbers are like almost nothing the game has ever seen before. There have been four seasons in NBA history where someone had 150 blocks, 150 assists and 100 3-pointers. Chet Holmgren did it for Oklahoma City in 2023-24, and the other three instances are all from Wembanyama — who has hit those totals in each of his first three seasons.

    “I think for a lot of people, this team seems to be ahead of schedule,” NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said Saturday on NBA TV. “I don’t think they feel that way. I’m amazed at Victor. Not just his play on the floor, but he’s such a curious young man. He’s a pleasure to talk to. He’s very worldly. I mean, he’s got amazing interests off the floor. He’s really dedicated to his craft and he’s got such a bright future ahead of him.”

  • After 53 years, the New York Knicks are NBA champions. And the wait sure seemed worth it

    SAN ANTONIO — Knowing New York had waited 53 years to see the Knicks hoist the NBA championship trophy, owner James Dolan didn’t even wait to be handed the 30-pound gold-plated prize.

    He grabbed it and lifted it skyward with a yell.

    “I want to say something to New York,” Dolan shouted. “Hey New York! I’m sorry it took so long! But here we are, and hopefully it won’t take that long again!”

    The New York Knicks are champions of the NBA for the first time since 1973, beating the San Antonio Spurs in five games for this title. The clincher came Saturday night in a 94-90 victory, the Knicks’ fourth comeback win of the series.

    Some will say it’s the first “major” professional sports championship for New York in more than 14 years; that would be true when counting only Major League Baseball, the NFL, the NHL, and the NBA, though it would be wrong to ignore the New York Liberty’s run to the 2024 WNBA title and New York City FC winning the MLS Cup in 2021.

    But as far as the teams that have been part of the city’s fabric for generations and generations, yes, this 14-year drought is finally over. The New York Giants won the Super Bowl in 2012, capping the 2011 season.

    The Yankees — the most decorated team in U.S. major pro sports history — haven’t won a World Series since 2009. The Mets haven’t brought a World Series title to New York since 1986. The Rangers last hoisted the Stanley Cup in 1994, the Islanders in 1983. The New York Jets haven’t won a Super Bowl since 1969.

    None of that matters, at least not right now. The Knicks — who won 13 consecutive games at one point in this playoff run and rallied from 29 points down to win Game 4 of the finals at MSG — are the toast of the town.

    “Of course I’ve never seen anything like it, because it’d never happened before,” NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said of the Game 4 comeback in an interview on NBA TV on Saturday. “But it’s been amazing.”

    The Amazin’ Knicks, indeed.

    A third title, finally

    It took them 80 years — the Knicks won the first game in NBA history in 1946, three years before what was then the Basketball Association of America started being known as the National Basketball Association — but the franchise has now become the ninth that can say it has at least three championships.

    Boston has 18, the Los Angeles Lakers have 17, Golden State has seven, Chicago has six, San Antonio has five, and Philadelphia, Detroit and Miami all have three.

    Welcome to the club, New York.

    “I enjoy watching these guys,” Knicks legend Larry Johnson said. ”The Garden is back. … It’s back like when we played and made our little run. The city is behind us.”

    It’s a franchise that has gone through 24 different coaches and more than 400 players since what was, until now, the most recent championship season. Some of the game’s biggest superstars called Madison Square Garden home and couldn’t end the title drought, names like Patrick Ewing, Allan Houston, Bernard King, and Carmelo Anthony.

    The Knicks lost a Game 7 in the 1994 finals to Hakeem Olajuwon and Houston, then made a miracle run to the 1999 finals in a shortened season only to lose to San Antonio in five games — the first of what became five championships for Gregg Popovich and the Spurs.

    “We didn’t get it done. … I always say the third time is the charm,” former Knicks guard John Starks said.

    Starks was right. It took the Knicks 27 years to get back to the finals, had the Spurs again standing in their way, and to fully flip the script, it was New York prevailing in five games.

    MSG, a banner is coming

    And finally, the world’s most famous arena — which has raised banners for Billy Joel, Elton John, and Harry Styles more recently than it had hoisted one for the Knicks — will be adding to the collection swaying from the rafters. If it follows form from the others, the banner will only have the Knicks logo, then “2025-26 World Champions” beneath that.

    A simple message. Getting to the place where the Knicks could say those words again, that wasn’t so simple.

    “There are a couple of franchises that are pretty iconic just because of the history that they have, the location that they’re in, sometimes even the building that they’re in,” said Knicks coach Mike Brown, who won this title in his first season with the club. “New York is definitely one of the few that you could say that to in all three facets.

    “Everybody goes through their ups and downs. I don’t really think much about the tough times that they had, because everybody has tough times, including individuals. You just want to try the best you can to be a part of whatever you can to bring joy to the city, to the organization. At the end of the day, the chips are going to fall how they fall. I feel blessed, fortunate, lucky, to be a part of what is going on now.”

    It is, to put it mildly, an interesting organization. Dolan — who rarely speaks publicly — isn’t afraid of clashes, even including ones with former Knicks greats like Charles Oakley, who was at road games in this title run but has remained away from MSG for years. Leon Rose, the team’s president, typically doesn’t make himself available to reporters either. There is an absolute mystique around the team and how it operates.

    It has not always worked. Over a 25-year stretch that ended with the 2021-22 season — not that long ago — the Knicks had the worst record in the NBA. In the four years since, starting with the acquisition of Jalen Brunson from Dallas, the Knicks have the NBA’s fifth-best record.

    And now, Brunson — the finals MVP — is the best player on the best team in the world.

    “It means the world to me,” Brunson said.

    Start spreadin’ the news …

    And this year, as Frank Sinatra said, the Knicks are king of the hill, top of the heap. Some in the fan base grumbled when the Knicks declined to hang an NBA Cup championship banner after beating San Antonio for the in-season tournament title earlier this season. Turns out, the Knicks were just waiting for something better.

    So, the 53-year wait is over. It was a very different league, and a very different game, in 1973.

    There were 17 teams in the NBA that season, barely half of the 30 that there are now. Teams called Buffalo, Baltimore, Kansas City-Omaha, and Seattle home then; the league has expanded many times since, adding 13 teams in nine different states, plus Canada and the District of Columbia.

    The top salary in the league then was about $380,000, or roughly $2.9 million in today’s dollars. There was no 3-point line then, no multi-billion-dollar television deal, no international players.

    The Knicks flew home on a United Airlines flight from the 1973 title clincher in Inglewood, Calif., and officials at Kennedy Airport expected what was then called a “rabid” crowd of fans present to greet the plane. They braced for “hundreds” of people that day.

    This celebration might be a little bigger.

    “To have the fans that we have in New York City and be able to bring home a championship after all these years is absolutely amazing,” Brown said. “It’s a surreal feeling.”

  • Independent Cascadia? Greater Idaho? Disunited states look toward divorce

    Independent Cascadia? Greater Idaho? Disunited states look toward divorce

    SEATTLE — The revolution begins with a poetry reading.

    Last month, a journalist turned organizer named Andrew Engelson invited friends and fellow Pacific Northwesterners to a small club in Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood for an evening of verse, in which his guests would ponder what it means to be from “Cascadia,” the bioregion stretching from Northern California, through Oregon and Washington, into British Columbia.

    Odes to volcanoes, woods, and rivers would help the audience reach the same conclusion he has: The region might be better off leaving the United States.

    Engelson and his group, Cascadia Democratic Action, are trying to drive conversations that could lead to 2028 ballot measures in Washington and Oregon on secession if things don’t improve. The effort is hardly an outlier in these Disunited States, where frustration on the left and right has created small but vocal collections of Americans so fed up with feeling disempowered that they’re talking about redrawing state lines or dissolving them altogether.

    “The salmon don’t pay attention to the 49th parallel,” Engelson said, referring to the U.S.-Canada border. “I have way more in common with someone in Vancouver, B.C., than someone in Arkansas.”

    Separatism is “in the zeitgeist,” said Ryan Griffiths, a Syracuse University political scientist who wrote the 2025 book The Disunited States: Threats of Secession in Red and Blue America and Why They Won’t Work.

    Activists in Texas and California continue to push independence. Lawmakers in inland California have pitched splitting the state in two or three. Organizers in southeastern New Mexico want to join Texas.

    Republican lawmakers in Indiana approved legislation last year inviting conservative counties in Illinois to become Hoosiers. A state senator in West Virginia followed suit in late 2025, inviting 30 border counties from Virginia and Maryland to join the Mountaineers.

    North of the 49th parallel, conservative Alberta is moving toward a referendum in October asking: Do you want to stay in Canada or have a separate, binding referendum to secede?

    The people Griffiths interviews often sound remarkably similar, he said.

    “Whether they’re libertarian or conservative or liberal,” he said, they complain that government is “in their face, it’s dysfunctional, and it’s distant.”

    One of the most successful of those efforts is, like Engelson’s, based in the Northwest, but on the opposite end of the political spectrum. The Greater Idaho movement, a 6-year-old campaign to move a large swath of rural, conservative Oregon into neighboring Idaho, has won support in 13 county ballot measures and turned a once-fringe idea into a subject of state capital debate.

    “Our system is not quite functioning the way it’s supposed to,” said Matt McCaw, a spokesperson for Greater Idaho.

    Greater Idaho proponents argue that their movement reflects frustrations that date to Oregon’s earliest days. At the 1857 meeting to draft Oregon’s founding document, 59 of the 60 delegates came from west of the Cascade Mountains.

    Today, eastern Oregon makes up roughly two-thirds of the state’s land mass but only 10% to 15% of its population. Lawmakers from Portland and the Interstate 5 corridor dominate policy debates and have pushed through gun laws, environmental regulations, and tax changes that many in rural Oregon oppose.

    As western Oregon transitioned from an economy built on timber, farming, and manufacturing to one driven by technology and services, the disconnect has grown.

    “They just don’t understand us on the other side of the mountains,” said Dan Joyce, the county judge in Malheur County, Ore., whose voters were among the earliest and strongest supporters of Greater Idaho.

    Semir Dzebo, a postdoctoral researcher at Oxford University who worked on a 2025 study on Greater Idaho, said public polling conducted through the study showed that the effort was less a partisan fight than an economic one.

    In other parts of the world, efforts to redraw boundaries are often rooted in long-standing ethnic, linguistic, or national identities tied to particular places, such as Scotland in the United Kingdom or Catalonia in Spain. Since the Civil War, America has felt “inoculated” against separatist movements, Dzebo said, “because it rests on a civic understanding of nationalism, that there’s no particular ethnicity that is ‘American.’”

    But as electoral politics have become more polarized, and as the gap between the rich and everyone else has grown, the sense of a shared American identity has eroded.

    “What propels these movements is when that sense of feeling different really comes with economic consequences,” Dzebo said.

    In that regard, the Greater Idaho movement and the Cascadia secession effort are cousins. McCaw doesn’t think elected leaders in the Oregon capital represent him. Engelson feels the same about Washington, D.C.

    Cascadians argue that people are often bound more closely by geography, ecology, and regional economies than by national borders, particularly when the borders stretch so far in every direction. Engelson said Washington and Oregon progressives could get more value from their tax dollars if they formed their own smaller political unit and paid for priorities such as universal healthcare and free college tuition.

    A number of states are already engaging in a form of “soft secession,” by conducting multistate public health efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic or forming compacts to address climate change.

    But none of the secessionist movements are close to achieving their goals.

    The Constitution provides a mechanism for changing state boundaries with the approval of legislatures in both affected states and Congress. But that tends to go only one direction. Neither Virginia nor Illinois has responded to the overtures of its neighbors.

    Oregon Democrats have declined to meet with proponents of Greater Idaho, and neither President Donald Trump nor Oregon’s lone Republican Congress member, Cliff Bentz, has answered calls for help. And voters in two of the counties that initially embraced the idea have since backtracked.

    The Cascadia movement faces an even larger obstacle. In the 1869 case Texas v. White, the Supreme Court ruled that the nation was “indestructible” and that states could not unilaterally secede. The court left open the possibility that a state could leave through “revolution” or with the consent of the other states but rejected the idea that a state could simply vote its way out.

    Hugh Spitzer, a retired University of Washington law professor who began studying separatist movements in law school, laid out a possible path through a treaty negotiated by the president and ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. But that would take decades and require momentum driven by more than a single political moment.

    Engelson said the second Trump administration had convinced him that conversations about separation could no longer remain theoretical.

    “We’re in an abusive relationship with the federal government,” he said. “Divorce is a valid response.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • After decades of pelvic pain and 100-plus doctor visits, one question changed it all | Medical mystery

    After decades of pelvic pain and 100-plus doctor visits, one question changed it all | Medical mystery

    Andy L. was a 19-year-old philosophy student at the University of Southampton, in England, when he first experienced a general malaise that left him with persistent headaches and feeling like he had a constant hangover.

    A visit to the university’s health clinic yielded a normal blood test; the doctor suggested Andy’s ailments were due to a bumpy transition to university life.

    But even after another normal blood test nine months later, the malaise continued. Then anxiety set in. After a panic attack, Andy returned to the doctor, who was now more emphatic that the problem was psychological. Andy was not convinced. After graduation, he hitchhiked from Britain to Ethiopia, a trip that gave him confidence he could function even as his health deteriorated.

    At age 25 he began experiencing jabbing pain in his bladder after urinating. A physician said it was probably a mild urinary tract infection or, perhaps, a bladder spasm. Drink plenty of water, the doctor advised.

    The following year, Andy awoke with pain in his perineum, the area that extends from the base of the scrotum to the anus, and he felt a lump deep in the tissue. His general practitioner sent him to a urologist, who diagnosed Andy with “atypical Peyronie’s disease,” a condition where plaques — sometimes painful — form in the deeper tissues under the skin of the penis, causing it to bend during erections.

    The diagnosis came as a relief at the time: “I thought: ‘Oh, good, something they can give a name to,” said Andy, who spoke on the condition of partial anonymity given the sensitive nature of his medical condition.

    That relief would not last. Follow-up tests over the years involved MRIs using Caverject, a drug injection into the penis that induces an erection so clinicians can assess vascular function and more clearly view the anatomy.

    “It was an unpleasant experience,” Andy said. “Walking around the hospital and then in the MRI machine for 45 minutes with an erection.”

    Still, the test ruled out cancer. But Andy knew his various symptoms did not fully align with Peyronie’s, partly because his pain was constant.

    That was just the start of Andy’s medical odyssey — a sometimes surreal quest that led him to more than 100 doctor appointments that included urologists, gastroenterologists, psychologists, and rheumatologists. He also saw an andrologist focusing on men’s reproductive health, sexual function, and urology problems.

    His physical symptoms — and extensive medical research — left him certain something biological was wrong. But the medical establishment often disagreed, leaving him questioning his own sanity and wondering if he was doomed to a life of unrelenting pain even while building a successful career and family.

    “I have the feeling that I am made up of two people traveling in different directions,” he wrote in his journal. “The person who feels ill and alone, and the person with some momentum behind them.”

    Constant pain

    Despite the pain, Andy’s life went on. He worked as a software engineer at the BBC, where he met his future wife. The couple had three children. During this period, from about 2004 to 2010, Andy said he experienced perineal pain “all the time.”

    It grew so intolerable that Andy asked his doctor about the viability of cutting out the aching lumps in his perineum. His doctor strongly advised against it.

    In 2010, he saw yet another urologist. This doctor’s note described Andy’s “constant pain … which feels like someone is pulling … his penis with a wire.” In response, the urologist told Andy it was time to stop fixating on his condition.

    “I strongly reassured him he does not have a serious medical condition, i.e. cancer, however, clearly he has a debilitating problem because he is very preoccupied with it,” the doctor wrote, adding that Andy had “a phenotype for chronic pain.” Finally, the doctor suggested a book on alternative healing called Teach Us to Sit Still — which, the clinician noted, he had never read.

    Further demoralized, Andy did not see another specialist for five years. He began running, which offered distraction, and threw himself into work, including leading a digital consultancy and building an analytics business with his brother. He started drinking wine every night to sleep.

    In 2014, he sold his analytics company and, with new private medical insurance, “embarked on another fruitless expedition” for a diagnosis. He also tried a range of treatments — various antidepressants, psychotherapy, beta-blockers, acupuncture, and a pain clinic — with little or no success. He saw a new urologist who said his condition “can’t be Peyronie’s,” but additional specialists could not find anything conclusive.

    Andy grew so weary of feeling ill with no explanation he remembers thinking, “How long can I go on?”

    A simple question

    Then Andy began losing weight — about 14 pounds in a few months — and experienced intermittent diarrhea. He was referred to Tom Creed, a consultant gastroenterologist in Bristol.

    Creed said it was clear Andy had been “traumatized” both by his painful symptoms and his experience in the medical system. “Nobody was really listening to him, and it struck me from the get-go that this was a genuine story, and he was really struggling,” Creed said.

    Creed ordered a colonoscopy, which he described as “very unexciting” until the end, when a bit of low-grade inflammation in the rectum caught his eye.

    “I thought, ‘it doesn’t look quite right,’” so he removed a tissue sample for biopsy. The pathologist identified something curious: a granuloma in the rectum — a foreign body surrounded by inflammatory cells.

    That’s when Creed asked Andy a question no doctor ever had: “Have you traveled anywhere exotic?”

    It turned out he had: nearly 30 years ago Andy spent a gap year teaching in Tanzania, where he washed and swam every day in Lake Tanganyika.

    “That was the moment the penny dropped for me,” Creed said. He remembered something from medical school and, thinking it was a long shot, sent the tissue off for another test and ordered blood work to look for antibodies that could confirm a rare condition he had never seen in a patient.

    Results validated Creed’s hunch: Andy had been suffering from schistosomiasis, a disease caused by parasitic worms, for nearly three decades.

    “Suddenly [there was] a unifying diagnosis,” Creed said.

    Schistosomiasis is a “neglected tropical disease,” according to the World Health Organization, most prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where parasitic worms live in certain freshwater snails that inhabit lakes and rivers. The worms infect people by burrowing into human skin as larvae, then traveling through veins into the bloodstream. There, they pair up, migrate to the liver, bowels, or bladder, and adult females start pumping out eggs — hundreds of them — which can lodge in various organ tissues, triggering an immune response. Humans pee or poop the eggs back into the water, where the cycle begins again.

    Andy had urogenital schistosomiasis, said one of his doctors, Mike Brown, a consultant physician at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London. In this disease, worms can take a “wrong turn” and wind up in the genital tract, where they can get trapped in the tissue and cause the kind of pelvic pain Andy experienced, Brown said. If left untreated, the eggs continue to penetrate the tissue lining, causing inflammation and scarring that can result in kidney failure, bladder cancer, and infertility in women. Brown said that adult worms can survive for 30 years or more and continue to produce inflammation-triggering eggs.

    When Andy got the phone call confirming the diagnosis, he was stunned. At 47 years old, he could finally see the path of his illness. He remembered a diagnosis of malaria in 1993 while he was living in Tanzania and spiked a 102 degree fever. The malaria test was negative, but the doctor insisted, “What else could it be?” This, Andy now believes, was most likely the acute phase of schistosomiasis.

    “When Creed called, he thought he was giving me bad news, but I was over the moon,” Andy said. “Having a diagnosis overruled any feeling of unease about the parasites living inside of me.”

    Following treatment with the drug praziquantel, the high level of antibodies in Andy’s blood decreased. “It’s an easy parasite to kill with the drugs,” said Brown, the tropical disease doctor. But even though the worms are dead, eggs already in the tissue remain and can cause ongoing problems.

    For Andy, now 51 and a tech consultant living with his family in Bristol, that means continued pelvic pain and a higher risk of bladder cancer, among other issues. But his headaches and malaise are gone, and he gained back the weight he had lost. “In terms of hardship, this all pales in comparison to battling against the misapprehension that I was suffering from an imaginary condition.”

    These days, Andy just wants to raise awareness about the disease to prevent others from suffering.

    “What happened to me happens to countless people in Africa,” he said.

    Indeed, the WHO estimates that more than 93% of people requiring treatment for the illness live in Africa.

    “Hundreds of thousands die every year, often from organ failure or bladder cancer. Many more are subjected to chronic illness,” Andy said.

    “But despite its prevalence,” he said, “schistosomiasis is a disease that most people in the developed world have never heard of.”

    Rachel Zimmerman is a journalist and writer based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Her book “Us, After: A Memoir of Love and Suicide” was published in 2024.