Category: Wires

  • China presses the U.S. for answers after a man dies hours after entering ICE custody

    China presses the U.S. for answers after a man dies hours after entering ICE custody

    The Chinese government is pressing for answers after a Chinese man died hours after being taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in a U.S. territory.

    Lianyong Wei, 51, died Aug. 23 at a hospital in the Northern Mariana Islands, ICE announced in a news release Tuesday.

    Wei was arrested Aug. 21 by the Northern Mariana Islands Department of Public Safety on criminal charges stemming from an alleged assault on a family of five at their home, according to ICE. He was taken into ICE custody the next day pending removal proceedings.

    ICE said a guard at the lockup in Saipan found Wei unresponsive during routine morning checks on Aug. 23. He was taken to a hospital emergency room, where he was pronounced dead after “life-sustaining interventions were initiated,” the agency said, noting that the cause of his death is under investigation.

    Wei entered the U.S. territory in February 2019 and was authorized to stay for two weeks, according to ICE. U.S. authorities began removal proceedings in July 2026, and Wei’s next hearing had been scheduled for this month.

    The Chinese Consulate General in Los Angeles said it had been notified of Wei’s death.

    “We have expressed serious concerns to the relevant U.S. authorities over this incident and required a timely and thorough investigation into the cause of Mr. Wei’s death, notification of the findings, measures to prevent any recurrence of similar incidents, and assistance to the family of the deceased in handling the aftermath,” the consulate said in a statement.

    Wei is at least the fifth Chinese national who has died in the custody of ICE or the U.S. Border Patrol since March 2025, according to tracking by The Associated Press. Two of the first four deaths have been ruled suicides, and the other two were the result of medical complications.

    At least 57 ICE detainees have died since President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, a death rate that has alarmed public health experts, advocates for immigrants, and the Mexican government.

    ICE hasn’t said whether Wei received the medical intake screening, which the agency promises to detainees within their first 12 hours in custody. Medical experts say a thorough screening is critical to preventing deaths.

    It’s unclear why it took ICE more than a week to acknowledge Wei’s death, which was announced by authorities in the Northern Mariana Islands on Aug. 24. ICE has said it aims to issue a news release on detainee deaths within two business days.

    The lockup in Saipan has held an average of 18 ICE detainees on any given day this year, according to ICE data. Roughly 50,000 people live in the Northern Mariana Islands.

    “Following this incident, the Department is reviewing relevant procedures and will implement any necessary corrective actions to strengthen prevention and response measures,” Northern Mariana Islands corrections commissioner Anthony Torres said in a statement.

  • How the Supreme Court locks away its own history

    How the Supreme Court locks away its own history

    In early 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia died of a heart attack on a Texas ranch, sending his Supreme Court colleagues into a period of grief and uncertainty. Behind closed doors, they had to contend with another piece of unsettling news.

    Scalia, the leading light of the conservative legal movement, had left no plans for his working papers, according to five people aware of the situation. For a Supreme Court justice, this was the equivalent of dying without a will. With no instructions for creating an archive or opening it to the public, the definitive inside account of his work — and the court’s — could be lost or emerge with uncomfortable speed.

    So following his death, his colleagues entered into private negotiations to try to head off any such situation in the future.

    In a series of memos and conference meetings, Chief Justice John Roberts led the surviving justices in discussions about imposing a more uniform seal for their own papers, according to several people with knowledge of the process.

    The absence of instructions from Scalia and ensuing confidential conversations, which have not previously been reported, help explain why the nation’s highest court can be so difficult to understand. The ultimate record of the court’s work is considered the personal property of each justice, to dispose of or share as he or she chooses. And many of the justices have valued confidentiality over transparency and chosen to postpone scrutiny of their work for years to come.

    In contrast with the executive branch, which is required to preserve and ultimately make public a record of its inner workings, there are no laws to determine what the justices save, shred, burn, or reveal, or when. The court does not share any information about policies or plans for records; a spokesperson for the court did not respond to written questions.

    People familiar with the episode after Scalia’s death, who spoke to the New York Times on the condition of anonymity because of the court’s sensitivity over disclosure of internal workings, recalled that a consensus was reached but had differing memories of its terms and how solid or lasting it was.

    Still, the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, just a few years later, provides a clue: Her Supreme Court papers went, at her direction, to the Library of Congress on the condition that no case file would be opened until every justice involved in the matter had died, a restriction that could lock away many documents for decades.

    Although some justices in previous eras arranged for their papers to be released not long after their own deaths, the trend on the Roberts court has been to impose much tighter restrictions, serving to further obscure a branch of government that has resisted calls for more transparency.

    Each year, the justices carefully compose and edit about 60 opinions in argued cases to share with the world. The fuller, richer narratives of each case, showing the behind-the-scenes stories of how members of the court pressured, persuaded, and prevailed over one another to arrive at those opinions, are hidden away in the justices’ working papers — their confidential internal memos and opinion drafts.

    The justices have said they want to keep those internal exchanges out of view, contending that secrecy protects the authority and finality of their decisions.

    Because of the court’s lack of transparency, it is impossible to say what will become of the inner history of its current work — which scholars say is more crucial, and more endangered, than ever.

    And people familiar with the court’s operations say they worry some of the most authoritative and revealing records are not being saved at all. That is because some work is now conducted digitally, via emails and texts. Those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal matters, said they were unaware of any consistent procedures for saving electronic records.

    The revelations found in past justices’ working papers have been so potent, they have caused bruised feelings among the justices and blowups among government institutions.

    And because no law governs the preservation of the justices’ work, each justice, assisted by staff, builds his or her own archival trove, deciding which memos, drafts, voting sheets, and meeting notes to preserve — or not.

    One spring morning in 1993, the justices opened their morning copies of the Washington Post to find detailed accounts of their internal debates. Earlier that year, Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first Black member of the court, had died, and his papers had been donated to the Library of Congress. With no announcement, the library had opened his papers for public review, and Post reporters had been digging through the newly released archive.

    The surprise release led to a brawl over how to interpret the justice’s written instructions. In a furious public letter, Chief Justice William Rehnquist took a swing at the Library of Congress, accusing it of “bad judgment” and of opening the records, some only two years old, prematurely. Marshall’s family sided with the chief justice, asking a senator to request that the papers be resealed. The library defended its reading of Marshall’s instructions. The papers stayed open.

    In the wake of that controversy, the justices considered establishing common timelines for releasing their papers but could not come to a consensus, according to the papers of Justice Harry Blackmun, who chose to make his papers public five years after his death.

    “‘This is the people’s court; it’s not our court,’” Harold Hongju Koh, a Yale University law professor and former Blackmun clerk, recalled his boss saying. “‘Who cares if we’re embarrassed. The main purpose here is to educate the public.’”

    The 2004 release of Blackmun’s papers again caused shock at the court, because of the unvarnished portrait they revealed. His 24-year chronicle of his time on the court exposed tensions among the justices, his own heavy reliance on clerks, and a bombshell: In 1992, the court had come close to overturning Roe v. Wade, but a centrist coalition of justices had secretly worked together to save the federal right to abortion. The precedent had been far more vulnerable than outsiders realized.

    A year after that release, Roberts joined the court as chief justice. The court’s new leader was reserved and disciplined. He rarely gave interviews or delivered speeches.

    The fullest record of the Roberts court is hidden away in its basement.

    In the bowels of the Supreme Court, below the red-velvet grandeur of the courtroom and the shuffle of tourists, the justices are assigned storage rooms in which they store case files, said people familiar with the court’s practices.

    Access to the records in the basement is highly restricted. But every year, about three dozen new people are allowed to read some of them: the justices’ incoming law clerks, who arrive for yearlong apprenticeships.

    Reading those files clears away the mystery that surrounds the court, say those who have seen them. Clerks often ask to read the insider accounts of the most game-changing decisions. But the deeper education is in learning about the dynamics among the justices.

    In public remarks, the justices have argued that their judicial independence requires keeping these kinds of exchanges private so they can bat around ideas and change positions.

    But some scholars question why papers should be sealed long after a justice has retired.

    The Trump era has transformed and heightened the importance of the current justices’ working papers: They will one day provide the public’s first opportunity to understand why the court ruled as it did in some emergency matters.

    “The more cases get decided without full opinions, the more important it is to get access to the papers,” Stuart Banner, a legal historian at UCLA, said in an interview.

    But it is virtually impossible to estimate when — if ever — the public might see those records.

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • Iran fires on its Gulf neighbors, retaliating for U.S. strikes after a wedding was hit

    Iran fires on its Gulf neighbors, retaliating for U.S. strikes after a wedding was hit

    Iran fired on U.S. allies in the Gulf early Wednesday following a night of American bombardment that Iranian state media says included a deadly strike on a wedding party.

    The latest violence came after a monthlong lull in fighting. The six-month war has led to a spike in oil prices, roiled the global economy and posed increasing political problems for U.S. President Donald Trump’s Republican Party ahead of November midterm elections.

    Fighting has escalated since the American military hit Iranian rocket launchers on an island in the Strait of Hormuz over the weekend, saying Iran was planning to use them to lay mines. Iran retaliated by firing missiles at American bases in Jordan that were intercepted.

    American military resources are stretched and political pressure in Washington is mounting, while Iran’s economy has been battered by sanctions and an American naval blockade. Iran’s currency hit another record low on Wednesday, with traders in Tehran exchanging 2.20 million rials for one U.S. dollar, a 10% hike from last week’s record.

    Neither side can continue indefinitely between full-scale war and a truce, said Hamidreza Azizi, senior Iran analyst at the Crisis Group, an international think tank.

    “At some point, one of the sides may see a need to escalate in order to break this cycle,” he cautioned. “So that could bring the two sides to a point that they have been trying to avoid until now, which is a full-scale war.”

    The struggle is focused on the Strait of Hormuz and oil prices

    The latest flare-up in violence came as the standoff seemed to be shifting slightly more in the U.S.’ favor, with the price of oil around $80 a barrel and Iranian leaders talking about growing economic hardships, said Sascha Bruchmann, an analyst with the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Middle East office in Bahrain.

    “The U.S. is trying to reinstall some kind of confidence into the global oil markets … and the Iranians had to respond to that by reinserting insecurity and doubt,” Bruchmann said.

    Since the fighting resumed, the price of Brent crude oil, the international standard, has climbed to around $95, up more than 30% from the start of the war.

    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran will “continue to feel the squeeze” from the United States until it drops any nuclear weapons ambitions and ends support for armed groups in the Middle East. Iran has always insisted its nuclear program is peaceful.

    U.S. allies in the region fend off Iranian attacks

    Following the strikes on Jordan, U.S. Gulf allies Kuwait and Bahrain said they had also come under attack, without reporting any casualties.

    “You will soon see that Iran’s new strategy on the battlefield, in diplomacy, and in confronting the economic blockade will shatter your foundations,” the recently appointed head of Iran’s powerful Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei, said on X.

    In Iraq, where Iranian-backed forces are active, Kurdish authorities said they had intercepted 10 drones laden with explosives in the Irbil area. Iranian television reported that American bases in Irbil had been targeted.

    Israel’s military also said that Iran-backed Hezbollah fired two explosive drones at its soldiers in southern Lebanon, without causing casualties.

    The U.S. Central Command said Tuesday’s strikes focused on Iranian military targets, including air defense sites, radar systems and maritime assets.

    Strike on wedding killed 4 and wounded dozens, Iranian officials say

    One U.S. strike hit a home hosting a wedding in Kuhestak, a small coastal town overlooking the Strait of Hormuz, according to Iranian state media.

    Four people were killed — two women and two children, aged 4 and 16 — and at least 68 were wounded, the state news agency IRNA and state TV said Wednesday. Just after the strike, Ahmad Nafisi, the province’s deputy governor, had told Iranian state television that five people were killed. There was no explanation for the change.

    Several heavy explosions shook Kuhestak, with fireballs that lit up the night sky, according to security camera footage carried by the semiofficial Fars news agency.

    Images from Iran’s semiofficial Tasnim news agency showed several hospitalized children being treated for injuries at a hospital in the nearby town of Minab, where a U.S. missile strike on the opening day of the war hit a primary school, killing more than 100 children.

    Footage from the Iranian Red Crescent showed rescue workers entering a damaged home in the wake of the strike. It showed a hole in the roof of one house in a neighborhood of densely packed homes.

    Experts say a ‘very precise’ weapon appears to have been used

    Two weapons experts told The Associated Press that images of fragments of a missile, which Iranian media said was used in the strike, were from a U.S.-made SLAM-ER cruise missile.

    Trevor Ball, an analyst with Armament Research Services, said the SLAM-ER was “developed as a very precise weapon” that can be retargeted in flight by a human operator watching by infrared camera.

    N.R. Jenzen-Jones, director of Armament Research Services, said the air-launched missile is also used by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Neither has reported carrying out any recent strikes on Iran.

    “Make no mistake: these crimes will not go unpunished,” Ebrahim Azizi, chairperson of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, said on X.

    U.S. Central Command spokesman Capt. Tim Hawkins said the U.S. military was “aware of the reports, which originated from Iranian state media, and we are looking into them.” He would not say if CENTCOM had launched a formal investigation.

    Separately, Iran has said four members of its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard and 10 members of the Guard’s volunteer Basij forces died in the U.S. attacks. A total of 108 people were injured in the latest round of attacks, state broadcaster the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting quoted the country’s health minister as saying.

    The Strait of Hormuz remains largely shut down

    During last month’s lull in fighting, the U.S. ramped up economic pressure on Iran as Washington sought to fully open the Strait of Hormuz.

    About a fifth of the world’s traded oil was shipped through the key waterway before Israel and the U.S. attacked Iran on Feb. 28 and Iran largely shut it down in response. Despite many pronouncements from Washington that the strait is open, only a handful of ships are making the passage each day and Iran has regularly attacked vessels.

    On Wednesday, Saudi shipping company Bahri said two Filipino sailors were killed in an attack late Monday as their vessel transited the strait.

    A ceasefire deal reached in June quickly fell apart amid exchanges of strikes that same month. Mediator Pakistan has been working to restart talks.

    Late Tuesday, Trump said he would not force Iran to the bargaining table.

    “I couldn’t care less if they sign a worthless, to them, agreement. I like our position now much better, with almost total control of the Hormuz Strait, and their economy totally collapsing. They are just playing out the inevitable. When are the Iranian people going to rise up and fight?” Trump wrote on social media.

  • Poll shows nearly 90% of Americans believe government corruption is widespread

    A record number of Americans believe there is widespread corruption in the U.S. government, reaching the highest level of distrust in two decades, according to a Gallup poll released Wednesday.

    The survey of 1,000 people conducted in May and June reflects the surging bipartisan frustration with the country’s political institutions and the people who run them.

    Nearly 90% of U.S. adults said corruption was widespread in the government, a 10 percentage point jump from last year, according to Gallup’s poll. The United States also has the highest level of perceived government corruption compared with other countries with advanced economies as of 2025, the year of the latest available data.

    Since 2006, the percentage of Americans perceiving widespread corruption stayed mostly in the 70s, Gallup’s data shows. It began to sharply rise in 2024.

    In 2024, when Joe Biden was president, 57% of Democrats said government corruption was widespread. In 2025, after President Donald Trump returned to the White House, that percentage rose to 76 and climbed to 91 this year, according to Gallup’s data.

    As November has grown nearer, Democratic leaders have homed in on anti-corruption messages in their quest to retake Congress. Democrats repeatedly accused the president of breaking his promise to get rid of waste, fraud, and abuse in Washington, instead enriching himself, his family and his allies through the federal government.

    During an event to mark the final 100 days before the midterm elections, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries,(D, N.Y.) debuted a new line in his stump speech: “We are going to hold the crooks accountable.”

    On the other side of the aisle, Republicans’ view of corruption has stayed relatively steady since 2024, suggesting that their perception of the issue does not hinge on the party in power as much as it does for Democrats. This year, 83% of Republicans and 90% of independents said corruption was widespread.

    That finding suggests that Americans are accessing political news and information — and that corruption is breaking through as an issue, said David Szakonyi, a political science professor at George Washington University.

    “There is a broad base consensus for the fact that something is broken in Washington,” Szakonyi said.

    The new poll does not shed light on where exactly Americans believe the corruption is. It posed a very broad question — “Is corruption widespread throughout the government in this country, or not?” — without identifying specific people, agencies or administrations.

    But over the last year, Democratic voters and lawmakers have criticized the Trump administration for what they have called “self-dealing” initiatives — including a $1.8 billion payout fund to compensate administration allies who felt they were unfairly investigated that was later abandoned and no-bid contracts given to Trump allies.

    During his presidency, Trump has made historic financial gains, charged by ventures including cryptocurrency that his administration is tasked with regulating. White House officials have said the president and his relatives have not nor would they engage in conflicts of interests.

    No formal federal public corruption charges have been brought against Trump administration officials since the president retook the office in 2025.

    Democrats have dealt with high-profile corruption investigations within their party in recent years. Among them was the case of former senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey, who was sentenced to 11 years in prison for a corruption case involving bribes that totaled nearly $1 million in cash and other items. More recently, Rep. Henry Cuellar (D, Texas) was facing bribery, money laundering and conspiracy charges before Trump pardoned him.

    In June, another poll had similar findings about government corruption views among American political groups. The Brennan Center for Justice survey, which polled 2,000 registered voters, found that majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and independents viewed corruption as “a very big problem” facing the federal government.

  • Smithsonian changes course, will put Latino museum in existing building

    Smithsonian changes course, will put Latino museum in existing building

    The Smithsonian Institution announced Monday that it will put its National Museum of the American Latino in a 145-year-old building on the National Mall instead of constructing a new one.

    The Smithsonian’s Board of Regents voted Monday to house the American Latino museum, which Congress created in 2020 but which has lacked a permanent home, in the Arts and Industries Building, a 258,000-square-foot redbrick Victorian structure next to the institution’s headquarters.

    Jorge Zamanillo, the museum’s director, called the decision “a major milestone in a dream and effort of decades in the making.”

    “Designating the Smithsonian’s Arts & Industries Building as the home of the National Museum of the American Latino places the U.S. Latino story at the heart of the National Mall and the American story,” Zamanillo said in a statement. “We could not be more excited to build on the rich legacy of this historic building and transform it into a next generation museum that celebrates the history, culture, and contributions of Latinos in the United States.”

    The decision revives a plan the Smithsonian considered but discarded years ago, a major shift for a project whose supporters have spent decades pushing for a new building on the National Mall designed specifically for the museum. It also gives the Smithsonian a path forward that does not depend on Congress approving construction on one of the undeveloped sites the institution previously selected.

    The Smithsonian had chosen two sites near the Washington Monument for its two new museums — one across from the National Museum of African American History and Culture and another between the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and the Tidal Basin. Both are controlled by the National Park Service and sit within the Reserve, an area of the Mall where Congress has restricted new construction.

    Because the Smithsonian owns the Arts and Industries Building, the institution can decide how to use it without additional legislation.

    That distinction could prove important. Building a Smithsonian museum from scratch can take a decade or longer, even after Congress authorizes it. The National Museum of African American History and Culture took more than a decade to build after its 5-acre site was chosen.

    In a statement Monday, the regents noted that Congress directed them to consider the Arts and Industries Building when it authorized the Latino museum in 2020 and said their selection of a site is now complete.

    The decision also separates the Latino museum’s path from that of its counterpart, the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum. The two museums were created together in 2020 and had been pursuing potential sites in lockstep, but legislation needed to move the women’s museum forward ran into a congressional roadblock this spring.

    The House rejected that legislation after Republicans added provisions restricting how the museum could present transgender women and giving President Donald Trump greater control over its site. The Smithsonian has said a new building for the women’s museum would still be roughly a decade or more away.

    The regents’ decision Monday returns to an idea almost as old as the campaign for the Latino museum itself.

    Latino advocates began pressing for a national museum after a Smithsonian-commissioned report in 1994, titled “Willful Neglect,” sharply criticized the institution’s treatment and representation of Latino Americans. The Smithsonian created what became the Smithsonian Latino Center in 1997, but supporters continued pushing for a full-fledged museum.

    Then-Rep. Xavier Becerra (D., Calif.) began sponsoring legislation in 2003 to create a commission to study the idea. Congress approved the commission five years later, and in 2011 it recommended creating a Smithsonian museum devoted to Latino history and culture, estimating that the project would cost $600 million. Among the locations under consideration was the Arts and Industries Building.

    The building resurfaced as a proposed home in 2016, when Becerra and then-Sen. Bob Menendez (D., N.J.) introduced legislation that would have placed the museum there and added an underground annex. The historic building presented challenges for a modern museum: Its soaring ceilings and skylights were not designed for conventional exhibitions.

    Congress finally authorized the museum in December 2020, during the final weeks of Trump’s first term, as part of a massive spending and pandemic-relief package that also created the women’s history museum. Arts and Industries was among four finalist locations for the two museums in 2022, but the regents ultimately chose the two undeveloped sites on the Mall instead.

    That same year, the Latino museum opened its first physical exhibition space, the 4,500-square-foot Molina Family Latino Gallery inside the National Museum of American History.

    The project has also become entangled in the second Trump administration’s broader campaign to reshape the Smithsonian.

    Trump’s proposed 2026 budget sought to eliminate separate funding for the stand-alone museum and instead integrate Latino programming across the Smithsonian. The proposal drew objections from Democrats as well as Republican members of the Congressional Hispanic Conference, who called eliminating the museum’s funding a “disservice to the American public.” A White House official said at the time there was no reason to provide construction funding because Congress had not approved a site.

    The museum’s programming has also drawn criticism from conservatives. It’s first exhibition, “¡Presente! A Latino History of the United States,” addressed immigration, LGBTQ rights, and criminal justice reform alongside figures including Celia Cruz and Roberto Clemente. Republican lawmakers criticized the exhibition’s portrayal of Latinos, and a planned follow-up exhibition on Latino youth movements was later scrapped.

    Mike Gonzalez, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation and a longtime critic of the Latino museum, has argued that the problem goes deeper than individual exhibitions. He contends that the museum was conceived to portray Latinos primarily as victims of discrimination rather than as part of a shared American story.

    The Smithsonian ”could never win a vote in Congress to house the Latino Museum anywhere else,” Gonzalez wrote Monday on X. He first wrote about the Smithsonian’s change in plans in the Washington Examiner this month.

    The building the regents selected Monday carries its own unusually rich Smithsonian history.

    Arts and Industries opened in 1881 as the institution’s second building and the first Smithsonian facility designed as a public museum. Over the decades, it served as an incubator for collections that eventually moved into the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of American History, and the National Air and Space Museum.

    The building closed in 2004 because of structural problems. A renovation that took nearly 12 years and cost $55 million stabilized the structure, although it has been used only intermittently since. The Smithsonian temporarily reopened it in mid-June to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary but plans to close it again at the start of next week.

  • At 91, Dale ‘Grey Beard’ Sanders reclaims record as oldest hiker to complete the Appalachian Trail

    At 91, Dale ‘Grey Beard’ Sanders reclaims record as oldest hiker to complete the Appalachian Trail

    MILLINOCKET, Maine — More than 14 million older adults fall every year in the U.S., perhaps none so often as 91-year-old Dale Sanders.

    By his count, Sanders fell 71 times while reclaiming his record as the oldest hiker to complete the Appalachian Trail. Six were what he calls hard falls, including one that led to a brief hospitalization and another just 200 yards from the finish. But none were enough to permanently divert him from the 2,193-mile trail that runs between Springer Mountain in Georgia and Mount Katahdin in Maine.

    The Appalachian Trail Conservancy defines a thru-hike as completing all of the trail’s sections in any order within a year, allowing for pauses. Sanders started Sept. 6 in West Virginia, hopscotched around with some brief breaks, and finished Monday atop Maine’s highest peak, where he paused to pray at the sign marking the summit.

    “I had to thank God, and I had to thank my support team and everybody that got me here,” he said.

    A long-planned comeback

    Sanders, whose trail name is Grey Beard, first set the Appalachian Trail record in 2017 at age 82. Four years later, his 83-year-old friend M.J. Eberhart, aka Nimblewill Nomad, took the title. But within months, Sanders announced his comeback plan.

    While Sanders’ first journey was easier than he expected, the latest was considerably harder. Despite six months of training, he said he wasn’t in the best condition when he returned to the trail.

    “And even today, I feel that I should probably be in better shape than I am,” he said last month. “But I just have to always go back and say, ‘But I am 91, so I’m blazing new ground hiking long distances like this.’”

    In June, Sanders was descending Killington Mountain in central Vermont when he fell forward in a boulder field, scraping his legs, arms, and hands.

    “Thank God nothing got broken, but I was banged up,” he said. “I didn’t rub the blood off, I just kept hiking.”

    Weeks later, his left arm went numb and he ended up at a Maine hospital. What doctors initially feared was a stroke turned out to be a pinched nerve, but though he was soon cleared to resume hiking, he considered giving up.

    He returned home to Tennessee in early August to be with his wife, whose mother had just died, and she convinced him to press on.

    His mission changed along the way

    Some of Sanders’ best days were in Pennsylvania, where he enjoyed well-maintained trails and treats delivered by “trail angels.”

    “When people are taking care of you and bringing you caramel frappes on the trail, the rocks don’t matter,” he said.

    In fact, Sanders has become something of a star among fellow hikers. Thousands more follow him on social media, which surprised Sanders and caused him to expand his mission beyond reclaiming his record.

    “I want to get it back, but right now, that’s secondary,” he said. ”Right now, what’s the most important thing — and it’s one of the things that surprised me — is that people are motivated and given encouragement by my efforts.”

    Meredith Ewenson, who met Sanders in June while leading a hike in New Hampshire for 10 other women, said he embodied not just the idea that anything is possible, but that the journey matters most.

    “Seeing it in real life is something that I’ll definitely remember forever,” she said.

    Ewenson said her group spotted Sanders early in the morning, but it wasn’t until he blazed by them hours later that they saw the Grey Beard logo on his T-shirt and realized who he was. They caught up with him that night at an Appalachian Mountain Club hut, arriving around 4 p.m.

    “I got here at noon,” he told them.

    The next morning, she and others cheered as Sanders performed a “victory dance” before setting off again.

    “My first thought was ‘Wow, his mobility is insane,’” Ewenson said. “His face on that body just doesn’t make any sense. My brain couldn’t compute how he was so impossibly fit for being that age.”

    Off-trail adventures

    Sanders was born in Kentucky in 1935, two years before the Appalachian Trail was completed. Bullied as a child for his small size, he gained confidence in solo sports like acrobatics and swimming. He later served in the Navy and retired in 2002 after a long career in parks and recreation.

    Sanders holds numerous other age-related records, including becoming the oldest person to paddle the entire length of the Mississippi River, an 87-day trip he started on his 87th birthday.

    On his latest adventure, he tackled obstacles like downed trees or steep scrambles with vigor, though he started to get a bit wobbly toward the end of one 12-mile day. He laid down on the trail, said he needed a power nap, and briefly fell asleep.

    Two minutes later, he got up and kept hiking.

  • Oil giant Chevron is expected to announce it will expand operations in Venezuela, U.S. official says

    Oil giant Chevron is expected to announce it will expand operations in Venezuela, U.S. official says

    WASHINGTON — Oil giant Chevron is planning to expand its operations in Venezuela, a U.S. official said Tuesday, just days after President Donald Trump announced an ambitious deal to develop the nation’s oil reserves and give the Pentagon a stake in the profits.

    The official, who briefed reporters on the expected announcement, said the company’s officials and Energy Secretary Chris Wright are expected to visit Venezuela on Wednesday where the new investment will be formally unveiled. The official spoke on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the White House for the call.

    Chevron is the second-largest U.S. oil company and the only one with a major presence in Venezuela. Chevron did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The announcement comes after the White House confirmed on Monday it is partnering with North American Blue Energy Partners as part of President Donald Trump‘s push to tap into Venezuela’s oil industry.

    The sweeping agreement has been met with skepticism from analysts who say it will take years to revive Venezuela’s production. They have questioned whether Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez has the legal authority to give the company 100-year rights over 17 oil fields with reserves of 65 billion barrels — and whether future Venezuelan or American administrations would overturn the agreement.

    Deal being pitched as step toward stability, democracy for Venezuelans

    The Trump administration wants elections to happen as quickly as is feasible, but is aiming to maintain stability as it helps Venezuela transition following decades of autocratic rule, the official said.

    The official argued that maintaining stability during such transitions “almost invariably requires you to work with elements of the existing structure, even as you are creating a new one.”

    The Pentagon’s role in the deal comes through its Office of Strategic Capital, which was created under former President Joe Biden to invest in technology needed for national security.

    A second U.S. official speaking on condition of anonymity described the Venezuela agreement as “a very standard deal” and said the office has made several similar ones since Trump returned to office.

    Trump says other companies are readying for business

    Trump has had his eyes on Venezuela’s oil since Maduro’s capture, and his aides call it a path away from reliance on oil from the Middle East. Trump has been pressing to get U.S. businesses to restore a presence in the country. President Hugo Chávez completed the nationalization of Venezuela’s oil industry in 2007, leading major players like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips to leave Caracas.

    Talking to reporters at the White House on Monday, Trump suggested that other oil companies were readying for business in Venezuela. “We have Exxon going in, we have Chevron going in. We have our big oil companies going in,” he said. ExxonMobil did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump in January said he was inclined to leave Exxon out of Venezuela after CEO Darren Woods called the country “uninvestable.”

    Chevron has been the only major American oil company actively operating in Venezuela since the nationalization.

    Trump was scheduled to meet with a group of large and small oil refiners on Tuesday to discuss ways to increase America’s capacity to refine oil into gasoline.

    The White House has said that increasing the number of refineries and expanding the capacity at existing facilities would eventually reduce prices for consumers. The administration also sees the need for more refineries to process oil from Venezuela.

  • Wendell Berry, writer who extolled America’s agrarian past, dies at 92

    Wendell Berry, writer who extolled America’s agrarian past, dies at 92

    Wendell Berry, a Kentucky farmer who plowed his fields behind Belgian draft horses and wrote lyrical poems, novels, and essays — mostly in pencil and without electric light — that explored his elegiac visions of the life and death of agrarian America, died Monday at his home in Port Royal, Ky. He was 92.

    His daughter, Mary Berry, confirmed the death.

    Lanky and rawboned in middle age, with melancholy eyes, a jutting chin, and a widow’s peak reminiscent of Lincoln’s, Wendell Berry wrote more than 50 volumes of poetry, fiction, and argument that championed small family farms, the environment, local foods, and interdependent communities, and railed against chemicals, most technologies, agribusiness, and distant government.

    “The national economy that is really run for the benefit of a very few people is preying upon and slowly destroying local communities everywhere,” Mr. Berry told Sierra magazine in 1990. “Everything we produce in rural America makes more money for other people than it does for those who produce it. We’re destroying rural America.”

    Mr. Berry was once hailed by author and historian Page Smith as “a prophetic American voice of our day.” He never became a household name but, as his oeuvre grew over a half-century, advocates of agrarian and ecological causes embraced his work as an eloquent, if sometimes didactic, expression of their own hopes. Some critics likened his landed exhortations to those of Henry David Thoreau or Thomas Jefferson.

    Toward the end of his long fight for agrarian justice, waged from a cabin in the backwoods of Kentucky, Mr. Berry was showered with honors, including the National Humanities Medal, the nation’s highest award for humanitarian services, presented by President Barack Obama at the White House in 2011, “for his achievements as a poet, novelist, farmer, and conservationist.”

    Raised on a farm in north-central Kentucky, he studied English at the University of Kentucky and writing at Stanford with the environmentalist-novelist Wallace Stegner, traveled in Italy, and landed in New York, intending to write and teach. He married, had two children, and taught for two years at New York University.

    But at 30, he confronted in himself a deep need to return to his roots — specifically, to an old two-room cabin on the Kentucky River at Port Royal, in Henry County, where his ancestors had lived since 1803. The cabin had been built in the 1920s by a great-uncle. He had known the place all his life; indeed, had visited it often as a boy and spent a summer there with his wife, Tanya.

    “In the life we lived that summer, we represented to ourselves what we wanted — and it was not the headlong pilgrimage after money and comfort and prestige,” he recalled in an essay titled for its inspirational setting, “The Long-Legged House.”

    In 1964, the couple resolved to stay and work the land. Nearby, they bought a 125-acre farm, called Lanes Landing, and started raising sheep, corn, and grain crops, and planted gardens for their own table. Mr. Berry also initiated a 20-year teaching association at the University of Kentucky, in Lexington.

    Returning to his home as a place to write for the rest of his life was a way to insure, to himself, that he would always be bound by the truth, Mr. Berry said in a phone interview in 2018 for this obituary.

    “It made a permanent connection between me and my native place, and with its landscape,” he said. “The landscape was there to check me if I was wrong. I could never go away and make up stuff at cocktail parties about the backwoods of Kentucky. I worked with people here in all walks of life and learned from them. It’s been a very rich experience.”

    He rebuilt the Long-Legged House and began writing there about sustainable agriculture and the culture of life on small farms and in farming towns — polemics about how such places were vital to individual liberties and why they were rapidly disappearing from a landscape increasingly afflicted with topsoil erosion, polluted water, and toxic chemicals.

    Over the next half-century, he wrote with a pencil or pen on paper during daylight hours. His farmhouse had electricity, but he refused to use electric lights at the Long-Legged House, where he wrote, because, he said, the power was supplied by strip-mined coal. His wife critiqued his work and typed his manuscripts on an old Royal standard. He refused to have a television set, or a computer after they came along.

    Mr. Berry first won national attention with The Unsettling of America: Culture & Agriculture (1977), a manifesto to save small farms from big business and a government bent on agricultural efficiencies that, he said, were destroying the land and a way of life. The book launched the modern movement for sustainable farming and became a conservationist classic.

    “The concentration of farmland into larger and larger holdings and fewer and fewer hands — with the consequent increase in overhead, debt, and dependence on machines — is a matter of complex significance, and its agricultural significance cannot be disentangled from its cultural significance,” Mr. Berry wrote.

    In a review for the New York Times, farmer-poet Donald Hall hailed its “worldview that derives its premises from the experience of working on the land.” Its author, Hall added, “argues with careful logic for the recovery of lost land, for the return of the small farmer to the countryside, the small farmer expropriated by the army of agribusiness.”

    Mr. Berry elaborated on this theme in The Gift of Good Land (1981) and Home Economics (1987), essay collections that described organic farming techniques in America and abroad. They argued that “industrial values” were killing family farms and threatening American society as a whole.

    (END OPTIONAL TRIM.)

    Marshaling fiction to his cause, Mr. Berry wrote more than a dozen novels and volumes of short stories. He invented a Kentucky town, Port William, as a setting for generations of lives interwoven in tales of murder, alcoholism, marital discord, and remembrance against subtexts of fading agrarian life. Some critics called his fiction moralistic and short on plot and character development.

    Others found his novels moving. The Memory of Old Jack (1974), the recollections of a 92-year-old farmer on his last day of life, was “magnificent,” English scholar Joan Joffe Hall wrote in the New Republic, saying it “makes us grieve that these rhythms of work and speech are lost to us.”

    As a poet, Mr. Berry produced some 30 volumes of collected verses, starting with The Broken Ground (1964). His “Sparrow,” in its entirety, was typically economical:

    A sparrow is

    his hunger organized.

    Filled, he flies

    before he knows he’s going to,

    And he dies by the

    same movement filled

    with himself, he goes

    by the eye-quick

    reflex of his flesh

    out of sight,

    leaving his perfect

    absence without a thought.

    “The quiet but sure and melodious voice of Wendell Berry makes The Broken Ground an immediate pleasure,” poet and critic Robert Pack wrote in a review for the Times. “He is essentially elegiac, ranging from praise to requiem; throughout his poems there broods a reverential hush.”

    Farmers caught in an economic squeeze regarded Mr. Berry’s ideas as naive. So did Charles Barnhart, a dean at the University of Kentucky’s college of agriculture.

    “What Wendell is talking about is a primitive agriculture,” Barnhart told the Times in 1988. “It’s a nice way of life if you have a rich father and you’re a tenured member of the faculty at a university. But I don’t see a great proportion of the American public returning to farms. And I don’t see it as an industry that would ever be capable of feeding 225 million people.”

    Still, Mr. Berry won a wide following. “It’s a movement on the way up, and Wendell’s influence in it is pervasive,” Ron Kroese, director of the Land Stewardship Project in Stillwater, Minn., told the Times in 1988. “Wendell Berry has been the contemporary conscience of American agriculture.”

    Wendell Erdman Berry was born in Louisville, Ky., on Aug. 5, 1934, the first of four children of John Marshall Berry, a lawyer and tobacco farmer in Port Royal, and Virginia (Erdman) Berry. The families of both parents had farmed in the county for more than five generations.

    Like his siblings — John Jr., Mary Jo, and Martha — Wendell Berry helped work the farm. He learned from a grandfather how to harness and drive a team of mules. He was a melancholy boy. But in childhood retreats to the Long-Legged House, he found peace and solitude and read Walden, Thoreau’s reflections on two years in a woodland cabin in Concord, Mass.

    A rebellious teenager, Mr. Berry was sent to Millersburg Military Institute, a boarding school near Lexington. He hated it. “The highest aim,” he recalled, “was to produce a perfectly obedient, militarist, puritanical moron who could play football.”

    At the University of Kentucky, he earned a bachelor’s degree in 1956 and a master’s in 1957.

    Mr. Berry and Tanya Amyx were married in 1957. In addition to his wife and daughter, he is survived by a son, Pryor Berry, known as “Den”; two sisters, Mary Jo Berry and Martha Baxter; five grandchildren; and four great-grandchildren.

    In recent years, still living and writing in Port Royal, Wendell Berry also joined nonviolent protests against mountaintop-removal coal mining, coal-fired power plants, and the death penalty.

    Besides the humanities medal, Mr. Berry received more than 30 awards, including the Sewanee Review’s Allen Tate Poetry Prize in 2014 and the Ivan Sandrof Lifetime Achievement Award of the National Book Critics Circle in 2016. He was the subject of a 2016 documentary, Look & See: A Portrait of Wendell Berry, directed by Laura Dunn and Jef Sewell.

    “His writing has sometimes been called radical, but he thinks of himself as a conservative, conserving what is most human in our landscapes and ourselves,” journalist and artist Paul Trachtman wrote in a 2005 Smithsonian magazine profile of Mr. Berry.

    “You know,” the story quoted Mr. Berry as saying, “if you subtracted the Gospels and the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence from my work, there wouldn’t be very much left.”

    This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

  • U.S. strikes Iran and Tehran fires back as hostilities flare again

    U.S. strikes Iran and Tehran fires back as hostilities flare again

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. military hit targets in Iran on Tuesday and Tehran fired missiles and drones in response as hostilities flare once again in an intermittent war that has lasted more than six months. One U.S. strike hit a home hosting a wedding, killing two people and wounding dozens, local officials said.

    The U.S. strikes followed others on Sunday that abruptly ended a month without military action and threatened to fully reignite a conflict that has spiked global oil prices and posed political problems for Republicans in November’s midterm congressional elections. The renewed fighting comes after President Donald Trump had appeared to pivot toward trying to bend Iran to his will through economic sanctions.

    “If the failed Nation of Iran retaliates for this very justified attack, they will be hit again at a much harder and higher level, but it will not be the biggest attack of them all, that is waiting in the wings,” Trump warned on social media.

    U.S. Central Command said the latest strikes were in response to Tehran trying to attack commercial ships and American forces in the Middle East. Trump offered an additional explanation, telling Fox News in a phone call that U.S. forces struck Iran’s radars.

    “They tried to rebuild their radar because they can’t see anything,” Trump told Fox. “We waited until it was almost built and then we hit it.”

    Iranian state media reported that the U.S. had bombed civilian sites along Iran’s southern coast and hit a civilian airport. A U.S. strike hit a home where a wedding ceremony was being held in Kuhestak in southern Iran, killing two people and wounding at least 50 others, Ahmad Nafisi, Hormozgan Province’s deputy governor, told Iranian state television in a phone call. Red Crescent rescue officials in the province said the death toll had risen to four, including a child.

    U.S. Central Command did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on those reports.

    Iran’s military warns of ‘devastating blows’

    Iran’s Armed Forces General Staff and its joint military command said the armed forces would deliver what they described as “crushing and devastating blows” against the United States. The state-run IRNA news agency cited a statement by Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which warned that the attacks have only strengthened the Islamic Republic’s resolve and tightened Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world’s oil normally flows.

    Explosions were reported across several southern Iranian coastal areas, including the port city of Bandar Abbas that is home to naval and air force facilities as well as Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz. Witnesses in Bandar Abbas told the Associated Press that the explosions were stronger than those on Sunday and said they saw smoke rising from the eastern part of the city on the strait.

    Iranian state television said U.S. strikes hit a fishmeal factory on Qeshm Island and several civilian sites in Hormozgan province. It said a fishing pier and a Ports and Maritime Organization tower in Sirik were among the locations struck.

    State TV also reported that the U.S. military struck the civilian Jiroft Airport in central Iran’s Kerman province, saying a projectile struck an area outside the runway and caused no casualties or damage to airport infrastructure.

    The U.S. and Iran are both seeking control over the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway off Iran’s coast that is a vital oil shipping corridor. Tehran effectively closed it after the war began.

    Oil prices have moved sharply higher this week with renewed clashes between Iran and the United States. Crude, already up about 7% this week, continued to rise following the strikes on Tuesday.

    The price of crude has jumped more than 50% this year and it’s dragged the cost of gasoline upward with it. The cost for a gallon of regular gasoline in the U.S. ticked higher again overnight to $4.10, according to AAA. Last year at this time, a gallon cost $3.19.

    Strikes have renewed after Iran said it would stick to a ceasefire deal if the U.S. did the same

    Before military action began again, the Trump administration had argued that hitting the right economic target in a campaign of financial isolation would get Tehran to its breaking point. Now, strikes are renewing even as U.S. stockpiles of advanced interceptors have been diminishing and the war has been unpopular among many Americans.

    A return to open conflict would be dangerous for the region, where Iran has targeted U.S. military bases and infrastructure in Gulf countries since the war began.

    Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said earlier Tuesday before the latest strikes that the Islamic Republic is ready to return to the interim ceasefire deal reached with the U.S. in June if Washington does the same.

    “If the U.S. returns to its commitments in the memorandum of understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will immediately reciprocate,” Iranian state media cited Pezeshkian as saying at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit in Kyrgyzstan.

    The June interim deal called for an immediate ceasefire and started a 60-day period for negotiations aimed at reaching a wider agreement, but crumbled soon afterward.

    In the previous strikes on Sunday, U.S. Central Command said its forces struck Iranian rocket launchers that would launch sea mines into the strait.

    Iran responded to Sunday’s attacks by launching missiles at U.S. sites in Jordan, which were intercepted, while the United Arab Emirates said it stopped an Iranian drone over its waters. Trump acknowledged Monday that more strikes might be necessary.

    The American military in recent days has cast the renewed fighting as limited, though Trump had acknowledged Monday that more strikes might be necessary.

    U.S. Central Command said Monday on X that its attacks on Iranian targets on Sunday were narrowly focused.

    “U.S. forces took limited, precise action against IRGC minelaying forces posing an imminent threat in the Strait of Hormuz,” U.S. Central Command said. “In essence, Iran created the threat and the U.S. military eliminated it to protect civilian mariners, commercial shipping, and the free flow of global commerce.”

    Central Command reiterated Tuesday that its attacks followed Iranian aggression against commercial vessels and American troops in the region.

  • College student steps into traffic, is killed after losing immigration status

    College student steps into traffic, is killed after losing immigration status

    A Haitian immigrant who had grown increasingly distraught after losing his protection from deportation and being outfitted with an ankle monitor was run over and killed Monday in what his family believes was a suicide.

    Pierre Damas Bel, 20, parked on the shoulder of Interstate 70 in Springfield, Ohio, some time before 8:45 a.m., got out of his vehicle and walked into westbound traffic, the Ohio State Highway Patrol said. He was hit by a tractor-trailer and pronounced dead at the scene.

    Like an estimated 350,000 Haitian immigrants, Bel had recently lost temporary protected status, which is given to people fleeing nations experiencing disaster. He had a pending asylum claim but had been summoned to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement office after the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed with canceling the status for Haitian recipients. Federal immigration agents placed an electronic monitoring device on his ankle, which is one way the agency tracks immigrants it is seeking to remove from the country.

    “He felt like he was treated like an animal,” his father, Pierres Ronal Bel, 40, recounted in a handwritten statement.

    Ohio authorities said they are investigating the crash.

    The Department of Homeland Security declined to comment on the circumstances of Bel’s death while the investigation is ongoing. The Trump administration has been calling Haitian immigrants into ICE offices to be equipped with ankle monitors and has sent two deportation flights to Haiti since temporary protected status was canceled for people from the troubled Caribbean nation. Advocates for the immigrants say the U.S. government is sending people back to a country where criminal gangs are responsible for massacres, kidnappings, and extortion.

    Haitian leaders in Springfield and beyond said Bel’s death is symptomatic of the extreme stress many immigrants are under as they fear being detained and sent back.

    “These policies are what caused his untimely death,” said Guerline Jozef of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, a nonprofit that provides legal and humanitarian aid to migrants.

    Bel came to the U.S. in 2024 to reunite with his parents, who had fled Haiti three years before. ICE said its records show he entered through CBP One, the mobile app the Biden administration established for immigrants to enter the country at a port of entry and request asylum.

    The family was granted temporary protected status, purchased a home in Springfield and settled into life in the U.S. Bel dreamed of studying medicine and graduated from high school in May with honors and as a proud member of the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC), his father said. He was the eldest of three siblings, and his family described him as smart and responsible.

    The young man’s Instagram account is full of photos of himself smiling in his JROTC uniform and displaying his diploma and various academic awards.

    Bel wanted to continue life as a cadet in the program but was distressed by what transpired after temporary protected status was canceled for Haitians. His father said he couldn’t play soccer as he had for years because of the weight of the tracker. Classmates bullied him and made cruel remarks. He begged federal immigration officers to remove the bracelet, his father said, but they refused.

    “I came to this country to pursue my education. I didn’t come here to commit a crime or hurt anyone,” he wrote on Instagram in late July. “Yet now I’m walking through the streets of the United States with a GPS monitor on my leg, carrying a feeling of shame and humiliation that I never imagined I would experience.”

    Then on Friday, his JROTC class instructor handed students their uniforms, which resemble those of the U.S. armed forces, but did not give one to Bel. His father said the college student concluded it was because of the device strapped around his ankle.

    “He came home that day feeling very bad,” Pierres Ronal Bel said through an interpreter.

    The younger Bel’s next asylum court hearing was scheduled for October. He did not want to return to his home country because he was afraid of the rampant violence, according to Vilés Dorsainvil, executive director of the Haitian Support Center in Springfield, which is supporting the family.

    On Monday morning, he left his family’s home and placed a video call to his father at 8:03 a.m.

    “‘I’m not feeling OK,’” Pierres Ronal Bel recalled his son stating. “I told him to come so that we can talk.”

    Hours later, he said police officers arrived at his door to report that his son “threw himself under a truck.”

    Community leaders consoled Bel’s parents at their home Monday evening. His solemn father gave interviews with reporters, and his mother wailed from an upstairs room. Residents have been banding together to support Haitian neighbors and call for an end to ICE’s enforcement campaign against them.

    Carl Ruby, a pastor who leads a Springfield congregation and advocates for Haitian immigrants, said he was struggling to make sense of the younger Bel’s untimely death.

    “I know that I’m a pastor and I’m supposed to be forgiving,” he said. “But right now as I sit with a broken family, I’m crying out to God for righteous judgment in those who made this happen.”

    If you or someone you know needs help, visit 988lifeline.org or call or text the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988.