Category: News

  • Pa. is the only state to split fish and wildlife management. Combining could save $34 million a year.

    Pa. is the only state to split fish and wildlife management. Combining could save $34 million a year.

    Pennsylvania is the only state that splits fish and wildlife management across two separate agencies, totaling a combined 1,298 employees — well above the number in similar states.

    Perhaps more dire, the Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) and Game Commission are expected to see hundreds of millions in reserves drastically reduced within a decade as the number of hunters and anglers continues to decline, according to a new report dated Aug. 31.

    The state could save $34 million annually by combining duplicative operations, the report says.

    The PFBC and Game Commission contracted the Wildlife Management Institute to conduct the independent study in search of efficiencies and collaboration.

    A statement by PFBC said the institute dug into the operations of both commissions, examined finances, looked at physical assets and demographics, and considered employee feedback.

    The institute then compared the data against other state fish and wildlife agencies before making recommendations.

    In a statement, PFBC said this week that the recommendations are only that, and not mandates.

    “The decision on whether to combine the agencies will require detailed analysis of additional factors that are unique to Pennsylvania, as well as potential action by the Pennsylvania General Assembly,” the statement said.

    Pennsylvania Rep. Anita Astorino Kulik, who chairs the House Game and Fisheries Committee, could not be reached for comment.

    The numbers behind the decline

    The report warns that the current way of doing things is unsustainable because the base of both commissions is eroding. Both agencies depend on fees and licenses to hunt, fish, and boat on state game lands and waterways.

    Since 2009, the number of hunters seeking licenses has fallen by 100,000, and it appears little growth is on the horizon. There are significantly fewer license sales to hunters aged 21-37 compared with those aged 49-65.

    The Game Commission projects hunting licenses will decline by 0.8% per year over the next decade.

    Much of the revenue decline stems from the shrinking base of hunters who typically pay full price. Hunters 65 and older pay once for lifetime licenses that require no more payments.

    The loss is similar among anglers. Fishing license sales saw a big spike during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2021. But sales have declined steadily since. Many of those buying licenses are also older and transitioning to senior lifetime brackets.

    The report says that nearly one-fifth of active registered anglers held senior lifetime fishing licenses by 2023.

    A senior hunter pays $52 for a lifetime license and an angler pays $85. Seniors also have an option of paying $102 for a lifetime license for both.

    Those licenses return only a small fraction of revenue generated by a standard adult license. Meanwhile, operating costs continue to rise.

    As a result, rising costs at both commissions are projected to outpace revenues within a decade.

    What’s in the report?

    Steve Smith, executive director of the Game Commission, noted in a statement that the report does not call for the two agencies to be completely merged.

    “The Pennsylvania Game Commission takes its fiscal responsibility seriously, and that includes being good stewards of every dollar entrusted to us,” Smith said. “In part, that is why we chose to do this study now, when the commission is in solid financial standing.”

    He also noted that the study does not recommend immediate action.

    The Game Commission has a sizable $504 million cushion, and revenues are expected to grow a bit. However, the report said annual expenditures will soon outstrip that. As a result, the Game Commission is on course to use 95% of those funds by 2034.

    Meanwhile, PFBC is projected to exhaust its $145.8 million in reserves within the same time frame.

    The institute recommends consolidating some operations, which would reduce the number of employees by 17%, saving about $34 million annually.

    How would it save money?

    The study looked at staffing and physical assets at five states comparable in size with similar geographic and ecological profiles: Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

    The authors say the biggest savings to Pennsylvania would come from unifying the law enforcement branches of each commission. Currently, the combined law enforcement workforce totals 337 sworn officers, surpassing those of comparable states.

    The Fish and Boat Commission’s waterways conservation officers enforce fishing, boating, and environmental laws and regulations by patrolling streams, rivers, and lakes on foot, in vehicles, and on boats.

    The Game Commission’s wardens patrol state game lands. They investigate poaching, illegal shooting, and trapping violations.

    Bringing the number of officers down to 222 would streamline the number of supervisors and enhance field coverage during peak seasons, the report found.

    It also recommends reduction of overlapping administrative positions, including top supervisors, legal counsel, human resources, and engineering.

    The number of buildings could also be reduced. The Game Commission has 74 field offices, compared with an average of 29 in other states. Sharing facilities would cut utility and maintenance costs.

    However, such changes would likely require legislation by the Assembly. There is currently no bill proposed, but combing operations could be tricky given that hunters and anglers have long had their own views of what the state should prioritize.

    Pennsylvania has a sprawling network of state game lands covering 1.55 million acres of public land popular with hunters and anglers. And it has 86,000 miles of flowing waterways popular with anglers and boaters.

  • Delaware County communities approve ordinance creating EMS authority without Media

    Delaware County communities approve ordinance creating EMS authority without Media

    Five Delaware County communities voted Wednesday to establish a new authority to provide emergency medical services funded by annual fees paid by residents, businesses, and other entities in their municipalities.

    The Municipal Emergency Medical Services Authority of Delaware County will provide advanced life support, or ALS, to Nether Providence, Rose Valley, Rutledge, Swarthmore, and Upper Providence.

    Media was originally part of the working group developing the authority proposal, but announced last week it would not be joining for financial reasons.

    Each community approved an ordinance to join the authority Wednesday night at Strath Haven Middle School and appointed a representative to the authority board.

    Nether Providence, Rose Valley, Rutledge, and Swarthmore voted unanimously to approve the ordinance. Upper Providence voted 3-1 in favor.

    The appointed board members include Nether Providence Township commissioner Max Cooper, former Rose Valley council member David Firn, Rutledge fire marshal Thomas Moleski, former Swarthmore council member Kristen Seymore, and former Upper Providence council member Christen Rexing.

    Creating an EMS authority is essential to provide reliable ALS service by stabilizing funding and staff, Swarthmore Mayor Conlen Booth said. Booth was a member of the authority working group.

    “The authority model, sharing fees across all potential users of the system, is in my opinion the most equitable way to ensure that a reliable EMS service is available to everyone who may need it,” he said.

    Talks kicked off last year shortly after Prospect Medical Holdings closed Crozer-Chester Medical Center and Taylor Hospital, leaving a gap in ALS support throughout the region.

    The authority’s name was originally going to be the Delaware County Emergency Services Authority, but was changed to avoid being confused with other county organizations and make clear that it was only providing medical service and not a police or fire response, Cooper said.

    Nether Providence Township Commissioner Max Cooper speaks after five Delaware County communities approved the creation of a regional EMS authority Wednesday at Strath Haven Middle School in Nether Providence.Torin Sweeney / Staff

    The next steps for the authority

    While the vote established the authority, it won’t immediately go into service. The new board members will be charged with building the authority based on the foundations laid by the working group.

    The recommended fee for residents will be $95 a year, although that is strictly a starting point for discussions, working group members said, and will be subject to future public hearings.

    “Ninety-five dollars is similar to the yearly voluntary subscription models that many of our local firehouses use, and is similar to other recently formed EMS authorities in the state,” Cooper said. “This works out to less than $8 a month and our working group views it as a reasonable cost to ensure stable funding for such a critically important service.”

    Businesses, nonprofit entities, and the municipalities themselves will have to contribute yearly fees as well. Using an authority and fee-based model was important for making sure nonprofits contribute to the costs of an EMS service, Cooper said. Nonprofits would not have to contribute if the system were tax based.

    “We anticipate this will decrease the amount of taxes which will need to be dedicated to this system, and relieve some municipal pressure to raise taxes on residents every year,” Cooper said.

    The board will have to decide the level of staffing and equipment needed. A potential partnership with Main Line Health is being discussed to provide some level of service.

    “The authority could contract just their staff, but the authority could choose to own the ambulances and equipment,” Booth said. “It could also be that the authority contracts them to provide all the services in their entirety and then the board manages the contract. There’s a lot of potential.”

    Representatives from Nether Providence, Rose Valley, Rutledge, Swarthmore, and Upper Providence pose for a picture after approving an ordinance to create a regional EMS authority Wednesday at Strath Haven Middle School in Nether Providence.Torin Sweeney / Staff

    The working group hosted a presentation about the EMS authority and took public comments before each town approved the ordinance. Several attendees who identified themselves as Upper Providence residents spoke against the authority, questioning the logistics and cost.

    “This is a tax increase, like it or not,” Upper Providence resident Justin Perry said to scattered applause.

    Another Upper Providence resident, former longtime Marple Township Ambulance Corps member Vince Delvacchio, spoke in support.

    “I don’t know where you think you’re going to get an ambulance if we don’t do this,” Delvacchio said, to more applause.

    Why Media opted out of the authority proposal

    Media had been part of the working group for the proposed authority, but borough council decided not to proceed for financial reasons, Borough Manager Brittany Forman said.

    The borough has an existing contract with Main Line Health to provide ALS service and had been in discussions with them about projected 2027 costs. The council tasked Forman with comparing how those costs would affect taxpayers vs. the authority’s proposed fees for residents and businesses.

    Ultimately the borough determined it would be less expensive to stay with Main Line Health, Forman said.

    “Our council is interested to see this get implemented and really does want to keep the dialogue open,” Forman said. “Even though we’re not joining this year, I think this is still just a great step for the region.”

  • Lawmakers accuse FanDuel of ‘promoting addiction’ amid battle over VIP promotions

    Lawmakers accuse FanDuel of ‘promoting addiction’ amid battle over VIP promotions

    Three members of Congress renewed their criticism of FanDuel Sportsbook on Thursday, accusing the company’s leaders of providing “misleading and incomplete” responses to a recent inquiry about the VIP services and rewards that it offers to customers.

    In a letter to FanDuel chief executive officer Christian Genetski, U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.) and U.S. Reps. Paul D. Tonko (D., N.Y.) and Valerie P. Foushee (D., N.C.) wrote that they “remain unconvinced that FanDuel is making an active effort to protect bettors from harmful gambling and instead appears to be promoting addiction.”

    The lawmakers had initially sent letters on Aug. 10 to FanDuel, Major League Baseball, and the Major League Baseball Players Association, and demanded that each make policy changes following an Inquirer story about a personal video greeting from Phillies star Bryce Harper that a FanDuel VIP manager sent in 2024 to a bettor who had a gambling addiction.

    In response, the MLBPA said last week it would support banning players from doing promotional work for sportsbook VIP programs in the union’s next collective bargaining agreement.

    The lawmakers had called on FanDuel to eliminate its VIP rewards and disclose information about those services, including whether the company had sent videos of other athletes to VIP bettors, or offered promotions to gamblers who experienced losing streaks and attempted to cut back on wagering.

    In an Aug. 14 response, FanDuel wrote that it is “committed to being a transparent and cooperative partner” but did not directly respond to many of the lawmakers’ questions.

    The company said it spent $158 million on responsible gaming in 2025, and that it extensively reviews customers’ betting history before offering them VIP status.

    Though professional sports leagues were once deeply opposed to legalizing sports betting, leagues and many franchises have now entered into lucrative partnerships with gambling entities.Elizabeth Robertson / Staff Photographer

    “Sports wagering is one of the most heavily regulated industries in the United States,” wrote Cory Fox, a FanDuel senior vice president, “and FanDuel operates a licensed online sportsbook in 26 U.S. jurisdictions.”

    The lawmakers seized on this point, writing that FanDuel also has a prediction market, FanDuel Predicts, “which undermines the integrity of — if not bypasses — those very regulations.”

    A FanDuel spokesperson said he was looking into the matter Thursday morning, but did not respond to follow up requests for comment.

    Prediction markets allow customers to wager on a range of subjects: sports, politics, Hollywood award shows, the weather. They’re regulated by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which thus far has enforced few limitations on companies like Kalshi and Polymarket.

    Critics — including former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who works as a strategic adviser to the American Gaming Association — contend that prediction markets are running illegal sports betting operations. New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport earlier this week petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether states should have the authority to regulate the markets.

    In their latest message to FanDuel, the lawmakers described the company’s “VIP perks, constant push notifications, and personalized promotions” as exploitative, and demanded the company provide a written response to eight questions by Sept. 17.

    Sportsbook VIP rewards and push notifications are a central thread in a lawsuit that the nonprofit Public Health Advocacy Institute filed in March in Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia against FanDuel, DraftKings, the NFL, and the data company Genius Sports on behalf Montgomery County resident Terry Thompson and Delaware County resident Christopher Sage, VIP bettors who each developed ruinous gambling addictions.

    FanDuel, DraftKings, the NFL, and Genius Sports have each sought to have the case dismissed.

    Thompson, who received the 21-second video of Harper, lost more than $1.8 million on sports bets, and planned to die by suicide earlier this year, rather than reveal to his family the scope of his losses.

    Harper has said that he recorded the message through the video service Cameo, but didn’t know that Thompson had an addiction, or that FanDuel intended to use it as a VIP reward.

    The Inquirer will continue to report on issues related to the growth of gambling addiction — among teens and adults — across Pennsylvania. If you, or someone you know, wants to speak with a reporter, please contact David Gambacorta or William Bender at dgambacorta@inquirer.com and wbender@inquirer.com

  • Burlington Stores is moving its headquarters to Philadelphia

    Burlington Stores is moving its headquarters to Philadelphia

    Burlington Stores, the discount retailer named for its longtime South Jersey home, is spending millions on new corporate offices in Philadelphia, marking the first time in decades the city has welcomed the headquarters of a Fortune 500 company.

    The company is buying 3151 Market St., a more than 400,000-square-foot office building in Brandywine Realty Trust’s $3.5 billion Schuylkill Yards development in University City, for an undisclosed sum.

    In all, Burlington plans to spend $370 million on the move, and is set to receive another $30 million in state grants. The city is also providing a $7 million forgivable loan, a job-creation tax credit, and a $1 million investment that will give Burlington workers free SEPTA passes for a year.

    Burlington eventually plans to relocate 1,500 employees from New Jersey to the new Philly headquarters, a spokesperson said, and hire another 500. The company has no plans for layoffs.

    They plan to gradually move employees by team. The moves will begin no earlier than late 2028.

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro called the move “one of the largest corporate relocations ever in the commonwealth,” at an event Thursday in the lobby of Burlington’s new headquarters.

    Burlington CEO Michael O’Sullivan, Gov. Josh Shapiro, and Mayor Cherelle L. Parker announce the retailer’s forthcoming move to Philadelphia.Jessica Griffin / Staff Photographer

    “It’s going to put West Philly and our growing downtown district on the map as a premier spot for some of the largest companies in the world,” said the governor, who announced the news Thursday alongside Mayor Cherelle L. Parker, Burlington CEO Michael O’Sullivan, Brandywine Realty Trust CEO Jerry Sweeney, and other state and local officials.

    Burlington will join Comcast and Aramark, currently the only two Fortune 500 companies headquartered in Philadelphia.

    Philly’s gain comes at a loss for New Jersey: Burlington has been based in its namesake Burlington Township for more than half a century. It opened its first store there in 1972.

    New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s office said in a statement that they were “disappointed by Burlington’s decision to relocate its headquarters.” But “the company will continue to maintain a significant presence and thousands of jobs here in New Jersey.”

    Burlington Stores headquarters in Burlington, N.J., as seen in 2025.Jose F. Moreno / Staff Photographer

    About 4,700 people worked at Burlington’s corporate campus and warehouses in Burlington County as of last year, with 2,100 people employed in Philly-area stores. A company spokesperson said Thursday that the company employs 8,000 across New Jersey.

    As for its current headquarters on U.S. Route 130 North, Burlington intends to have it rezoned for warehouse space and turn some of the property into farmland. The company plans to keep its New Jersey warehouse and distribution centers in Burlington, Edgewater Park, Florence, and Logan Township.

    Burlington’s move is the latest win for Parker and Shapiro, who is up for reelection in November, as well as the governor’s Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED). Earlier this week, Shapiro’s administration announced $50 million in state grants and loans to help fund the yogurt company Chobani’s expansion into Allentown.

    “This is another day in what’s been just a monster week,” DCED Secretary Rick Siger said. “It’s another proof point of Pennsylvania’s strength as a business destination.”

    Burlington’s new home base will be part of Schuylkill Yards, a 14-acre project that Brandywine has undertaken with Drexel University. Its developers initially planned for the complex to include luxury housing, public space, and offices and labs.

    “What we’ve seen today is what can happen through a public-private partnership when leaders have a shared vision, a dedication to cause, and an unwavering commitment to the exciting future we can create by working together,” said Sweeney, Brandywine’s CEO, on Thursday.

    (function() { var l = function() { new pym.Parent( ‘burlington-move__graphic’, ‘https://media.inquirer.com/storage/inquirer/ai2html/burlington-move/index.html’); }; if(typeof(pym) === ‘undefined’) { var h = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0], s = document.createElement(‘script’); s.type = ‘text/javascript’; s.src = ‘https://pym.nprapps.org/pym.v1.min.js’; s.onload = l; h.appendChild(s); } else { l(); } })();

    Burlington was initially drawn to Philly because of the city’s history and culture, including its food scene, artistic institutions, and sports fandom, according to O’Sullivan. But the CEO said conversations with Shapiro and Parker “pushed this decision over the line.”

    “We found the vision that they laid out for the city and the state hugely compelling,” he said. “We were very impressed by their clear priorities and their focus on getting stuff done around economic development, education and training, public transportation, public safety, and fiscal responsibility.”

    Burlington has been expanding in recent years as more consumers, including higher-income shoppers, flock to discount retailers.

    Shoppers and employees at the Burlington Store at 833 Market St. in Philadelphia in 2018.Jessica Griffin / Staff Photographer

    As of August, the company operated 1,300 stores in 47 states, including eight in Philadelphia and dozens across the region. By the end of the year, the company plans to open another 115 stores and hire 5,000 more employees, O’Sullivan said Thursday.

    The chain’s growth has paid off, with a 21% increase in net income and a 9% jump in sales last year.

    In an earnings call, O’Sullivan attributed those numbers to the company’s tariff response, which included inventory reductions, price increases on certain items, and an aggressive cutting of expenses.

    Burlington has continued to report strong earnings in the first half of 2026, with a boost from $55 million in tariff refunds. O’Sullivan has said the company plans to put that money toward more markdowns for customers.

    Shapiro and Parker both said they had shopped at Burlington, with Shapiro patronizing the Jenkintown store and Parker frequenting the location at the former Cheltenham Mall in Wyncote.

    O’Sullivan said with a laugh: “The mayor and the governor got my full attention when they independently confirmed that they both exclusively wear clothes from Burlington.”

  • ‘Do one outrageous thing in the cause of simple justice’: Gloria Steinem’s campaign for equality at the King of Prussia Mall

    ‘Do one outrageous thing in the cause of simple justice’: Gloria Steinem’s campaign for equality at the King of Prussia Mall

    Gloria Steinem — the author, activist, and feminist icon — died on Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026, at the age of 92.

    In 1982, Steinem traveled to Philadelphia to receive an award. During her trip, she met with The Inquirer’s Kathy Hacker, who wrote this profile. Hacker died in January of 2021.

    The Equal Rights Amendment was ratified by 38 states well after the original deadline mentioned in this article, and the legal and congressional debate continues. It is not recognized as part of the Constitution.

    For a woman who has so often disavowed the label of “celebrity,” the scene probably was a bit discomfiting. First came the makeup man, intent on penciling her eyebrows and sponging suntan-colored goo over an already classically beautiful face.

    Then came the television cameras, attached by a tangle of electrical wiring to a perspiring crew from NBC’s “Today” show.

    And, finally, there were the fans, a zealous flock of devotees angling for a closer look, perchance a word and — the ultimate coup — an autograph.

    If it didn’t quite qualify as a Hollywood-style welcome, the hoopla yesterday was sufficient nonetheless to jolt the modest sensibilities of that most private of public persons, Gloria Steinem.

    “Sure, you feel a little foolish — you begin wondering what to do with your teeth,” sighed the premier philosopher-scribe of the women’s movement during a rare respite in a daylong visit to Philadelphia.

    From left, Gloria Steinem with Patricia Carbine, a fellow founder of Ms. magazine, in New York on May 7, 1987. ANGEL FRANCO

    As she spoke, an entourage pored over her frenetic schedule, which had her popping up in places as disparate as the Women Organized Against Rape offices in Center City and the furniture department in Bloomingdale’s King of Prussia emporium.

    Just as pressing, they debated whether to rush out and buy Steinem a dressier blouse.

    In the midst of the hubbub, with a microphone dangling nearby, she shrugged:

    “It’s difficult. But if there’s one thing I don’t want to do, it’s let anyone down at a time like this.”

    Gloria Steinem in New York on Sept. 23, 2015. CAITLIN OCHS

    The attention did not necessarily take her by surprise. It was, for starters, Lucretia Mott Day, a major feminist observance called by Womens Way in honor of the l9th-century Quaker who devoted her life to the advocacy of women’s rights and the abolition of slavery.

    And so, as the sun was peeking over Manhattan yesterday morning, Steinem climbed out of bed, pulled on a pair of boots, chocolate-brown wool slacks and a matching silk shirt, hopped aboard an Amtrak train and chugged to Philadelphia for the celebration, which culminated last night in the fifth annual Lucretia Mott Award gala at the Bellevue Stratford hotel.

    This year, Womens Way chose none other than Steinem as the recipient of its medal. Like Mott herself, she is a fighter — and for a cause that, while certainly not lost, seems painfully far from being won.

    As summer begins, the 48-year-old Steinem finds herself in a situation that is, at best, bittersweet. Come June, she and her fellow feminists on the staff of Ms. magazine will be marking the 10th anniversary of the publication, which she helped found and has since served dutifully as editor and writer.

    For the occasion, she’ll be throwing a bash at the Armory in New York and then will be jetting off to all corners of the country to appear as a guest on the Merv Griffin, Phil Donahue and “Today” shows (hence, the omnipresent cameras). Another bit of sweetness in Steinem’s life: “She’s Nobody’s Baby,” a documentary on 20th-century women that she and her Ms. colleagues produced for Home Box Office, just received a prestigious Peabody Award.

    Chances are, however, that Steinem will not be raising her glass in a toast on June 30. On that day, the deadline for ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment will come . . . and, by the looks of things, go, with approval by three state legislatures still lacking. She is, understandably enough, angry.

    But beaten? Never.

    “It’s important to say that there’s still a possibility of ratification,” she pointed out. “The odds are slender, I know. But remember, there are only about a dozen aging white men who have to change their minds. It’s still possible.”

    Having said that, Steinem voiced what is virtually inevitable: “OK, let’s say it doesn’t get ratified this time around.” The people who worked before, she guaranteed, will continue working. And furthermore, she vowed, they will fight to reintroduce the amendment in Congress before this fall’s elections.

    “It isn’t as if the country doesn’t support it, since opinion polls have shown just the opposite to be true,” she said, then added vigorously: “We are going to stay. We are not going away.”

    Steinem’s battle cry echoed yesterday afternoon through Bloomingdale’s third-floor furniture department, converted into an auditorium for her lecture and a twin showing of “She’s Nobody’s Baby.” If Bloomie’s seemed at first an odd choice of forums, Steinem assured that suburban department stores are a logical arena.

    “Shopping malls,” she smiled, “are what churches once were to Black women in the South. It’s where everybody goes.”

    To be sure, a record-breaking crowd of 200 suburban women, children and a smattering of men had gathered there to hear her — and to pick up free samples of shampoo and copies of Ms. magazine’s May issue.

    To the assembled throng, Steinem preached organization and demonstrated her caustic “lip.”

    “Some of us are having flashes of revelation,” she noted wryly. “It’s dawned on us that we’re becoming the men we wanted to marry.”

    Before dashing back to Center City, where Mayor [William] Green was waiting with an official proclamation in hand, Steinem exacted a promise from the crowd.

    “You’ve gotta do one thing,” she urged. “Promise me that, within the next 24 hours, you’ll do one outrageous thing in the cause of simple justice. I don’t care what it is. It could be saying, ‘Pick it up yourself.’ If you’re employed outside the home, it could be comparing salaries.”

    Her parting words, delivered with a mischievous grin: “Just one outrageous thing.”

    Lucretia Mott, no doubt, would have approved.

  • Gloria Steinem, a potent voice of U.S. feminism and cofounder of Ms. Magazine, has died

    Gloria Steinem, a potent voice of U.S. feminism and cofounder of Ms. Magazine, has died

    NEW YORK — Gloria Steinem, the celebrated author and activist who became one of the most visible symbols and potent voices of the U.S. women’s movement and a fierce advocate for feminist causes throughout her life, has died. She was 92.

    With her trademark streaked hair parted down the middle and large aviator glasses, Ms. Steinem, a co-founder of Ms. Magazine, was a hugely recognizable presence wherever she went. And she went everywhere: Much of her life as an advocate was spent on the road, speaking at college campuses and community centers, at rallies and marches.

    She died Wednesday at her home in New York City, according to her and her foundation’s social media pages.

    “Gloria’s greatest gift was her ability to listen to others, to make others feel seen and heard,” the posts said. “Her words, actions, and example gave people permission to be their truest selves. Gloria lived true to her independent spirit, always with curiosity and a great sense of humor.”

    Ms. Steinem enjoyed writing and spending time in the community in recent years, the posts said. She also hosted talking circles for hundreds of people in her home. She died just before a planned memoir was to be released this fall.

    “You can’t do it on the phone or on the web,” she told The Associated Press in a 2015 interview. “You have to be there with all five senses. It should be obvious that people can’t empathize with each other unless we’re in the same room.”

    Ms. Steinem changed her career path after a start as a journalist

    Ms. Steinem at an Equal Rights Amendment rally outside the White House on July 4, 1981.Scott Applewhite

    She began her career as a journalist, notably one who reported, in 1963, on degrading conditions in Hugh Hefner’s Playboy empire, an undercover assignment she came to later regret. She credits a meeting six years later, where women spoke out boldly in favor of abortion rights, with changing her career path.

    “That speak-out was the beginning of activism for me,” Ms. Steinem, who had undergone a secret illegal abortion herself at age 22, told the AP in an email in 2022, reflecting on the reversal of Roe v Wade. “Either our control over our own bodies is equal, regardless of sex or race, or we’re not living in a democracy.”

    Though she soon became a known activist, those who watched Ms. Steinem denounce discrimination for so many years likely never suspected that she’d had to overcome a deep fear of public speaking. She would have simply stuck to writing, she said, if only editors at the time had been willing to let her write about the women’s movement.

    But they weren’t interested, she told the AP in 2015. “So I ended up going out and speaking, which was my nightmare,” she said. “I mean, I was terrified. But I’m grateful, even though I still get scared even now.”

    Ms. Steinem’s visibility endured throughout her life

    Ms. Steinem claps as she walks on the stage during an International Women’s Day event in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, in 2023.Kamran Jebreili

    Time hardly slowed Ms. Steinem down; well into her 80s she was traveling the globe and speaking out on issues of importance to her. These included everything from genital mutilation to Korean reconciliation, but it was equality for women that took precedence. “Being a feminist means that you see the world as whole instead of half,” she once said. “It shouldn’t need a name, and one day it won’t.”

    As the years went on, Ms. Steinem’s visibility endured. At 83, she sat in the front row of her first fashion show, guest of designer Prabal Gurung. A few days after her 85th birthday, she was leading a women’s “talking circle” at an off-Broadway play celebrating her life, where one by one, women in the audience — many fighting tears — rose to thank her and tell their own stories of discrimination. In 2020, her life was the subject of a feature film, The Glorias, A Life on The Road, based on her 2015 memoir and starring Julianne Moore.

    And at 91, she collaborated on a picture book with Liberian peace activist and Nobel laureate Leymah Gbowee aimed at inspiring young people to change the world. Rise, Girl, Rise: Our Sister-Friend Journey. Together for All was published in February.

    The constant visibility came with a price; even into her older years, Ms. Steinem expressed frustration that despite her accomplishments, she was often described as beautiful or glamorous (A 1992 Vanity Fair profile even noted her “spectacular racehorse legs.”) It was a label she said unfairly detracted from her message.

    “Nobody ever called me beautiful until I was publicly a feminist, and that was in my mid-30s,” she told AP in a 2011 interview. “It was clear that label was being assigned to me. The most hurtful part is that you work very hard, and people say it’s because of your looks.”

    Ms. Steinem dealt with hostility from many directions

    Of course, Ms. Steinem also had to deal with hostility. Sometimes it came from surprising places. Appearing on Larry King’s talk show on CNN in 1990, she was visibly stunned when a female caller greeted her cheerfully, then told her to “rot in hell” because she had ruined “the beautiful American family.”

    But by then, she noted, at least people were taking feminists seriously. That wasn’t the case in 1972 when she co-founded Ms. Magazine and many commentators — especially male — dismissed it as ridiculous, predicting an early demise. (The magazine continues to this day, published by the Feminist Majority Foundation.)

    Among Ms. Steinem’s detractors was President Richard Nixon, who was caught on an Oval Office tape ridiculing both her and the “Ms.” title. The ridicule was mutual: In a 1972 National Press Club speech, Ms. Steinem called Nixon “the most sexually insecure chief of state since Napoleon.”

    It was just one example of Ms. Steinem’s trademark wit. Before she married at 66, she often explained her singlehood by saying “I can’t mate in captivity.” Laughter, she wrote, was “the only free emotion — the only one that can’t be compelled.”

    In 2013, Ms. Steinem was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Barack Obama. “Because of her work across America and around the world, more women are afforded the respect and opportunities that they deserve,” he said, “but she also changed how women thought about themselves.”

    Ms. Steinem ‘read everything I could get my hands on’ growing up

    Gloria Marie Steinem was born on March 25, 1934, in Toledo, Ohio. Her father was a traveling antique salesperson; she spent her early years on the road with her parents, not attending regular school. “I just read everything I could get my hands on,” she told an audience at Manhattan’s 92Y in 2026. “Which was frequently completely unsuitable … just everything and anything. I also was in love with the movies — my idea of heaven was a movie and a malted.”

    In 1944 her parents divorced, and 10-year-old Gloria was left to take care of her mother. a once-promising journalist who struggled to combine her work with running a household, and eventually suffered a nervous breakdown.

    As a young girl she excelled at tap dancing — it was even going to be her “ticket out of Toledo,” she said. Although she remained a good dancer, that particular career didn’t materialize. She attended Smith College in the ’50s, a time when, she has said, women were being educated to be mothers and wives.

    But marriage was not on Ms. Steinem’s mind. “I was engaged to a very nice man. It wasn’t his fault, but I just didn’t want to get married,” she told her 2026 audience. Instead, she took advantage of a modest fellowship to travel to India. After that, Ms. Steinem headed to Manhattan, where she couldn’t rent her own apartment because, she said, landlords avoided single women, assuming “if you could earn enough, you must be a hooker.”

    The aspiring journalist wanted to write about politics. But editors gave her assignments on food, fashion, and, in what she jokingly called “the low point of my life,” an article about textured stockings. Even more demoralizing was her experience with an editor who, she said, gave her a choice one day: Spend the afternoon in a hotel with him, or mail his letters on the way out.

    She chose to mail the letters. “There was no word for sexual harassment then,” she has said. “It was just life.”

    But one assignment in 1963 sounded compelling: posing as a Playboy Bunny, for an exposé in the now-defunct Show magazine. Ms. Steinem went through the audition process, assuming she’d be weeded out. But she was given her bunny costume — “so tight, it would give a man a cleavage,” she joked — and worked in the job for about a month.

    “I could not have made a bigger mistake,” she told the AP in 2011. “It was personally and professionally a disaster. In the short term, it was much harder to get assignments, and in the long term it’s been used to ridicule me.”

    Ms. Steinem’s writing became more political in her 30s

    Ms. Steinem was in her 30s when she joined the editorial board of New York magazine, and her writing became more political. In 1969, she went to cover an abortion rights hearing. She had never told anyone about her illegal abortion at 22, in London. That was the moment, she has said, that triggered her career as a women’s rights activist. “I don’t think I had ever felt part of a group before,” she said in a 1970 TV interview.

    Ms. Steinem founded the National Women’s Political Caucus in 1971 along with Betty Friedan, Shirley Chisholm and Bella Abzug. The latter became a dear lifelong friend — “the woman I wished I had had as a mother,” she said at Abzug’s funeral.

    Unlike Abzug, Ms. Steinem was naturally reserved, not comfortable in front of a crowd. Gradually, with her early speaking partner Dorothy Pitman Hughes, a Black feminist and child welfare advocate, she found her footing. The two formed a powerful partnership at a time when feminism was viewed as largely a white, middle-class movement. In an iconic photo, the two raise their right arms together in the Black Power salute.

    As she grew more famous, Ms. Steinem drew attention not just for her work but for a glamorous Manhattan life. Asked once about her streaked hair and aviator glasses, she explained that the hair was inspired by Holly Golightly, the free-spirited character played by Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany’s. The glasses? They were “more about hiding,” she said.

    When reaction was hostile, Ms. Steinem would try to reason that it was a step above ridicule. But sometimes it stung, like a snarky Esquire profile in the early ’70s, so hurtful that she cried, and colleagues called a news conference to defend her.

    Ms. Steinem co-founded Ms. Magazine and stayed with it as an adviser

    (From left) Tennis star Billie Jean King, astronaut Sally Ride, and Ms. Steinem at a reception hosted by the Girls Club of America and Ms. Magazine to honor Ride in 1983.ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Then came Ms. Magazine in 1972, a magazine by women, for women. “I was so obsessed with the fear that it would fail and be a disgrace to the movement,” Ms. Steinem, age 37 when it launched, told the AP in 2011. And opponents hoped that would happen. TV newsman Harry Reasoner, an especially tart critic, later apologized on air. Ms. Steinem continued with Ms. until it was bought in 2001 by the Feminist Majority Foundation, and remained an adviser.

    By 1977, numerous gains had been made for women, including Roe in 1973. But the Equal Rights Amendment, which had passed the House and Senate in 1972 but needed to be ratified by three-quarters of state legislatures, remained elusive. The issue was front and center at the 1977 National Women’s Conference, convened on a congressional mandate to examine women’s rights.

    “If they want us to become the radicals that they fear we are, just let them stop the ERA and we will become those radicals,” Ms. Steinem said there.

    Among groups Ms. Steinem co-founded were the Women’s Action Alliance, which was active through the 1990s; the Women’s Media Center in 2004, the Voters for Choice political action committee in 1977, and the Ms. Foundation for Women. She also helped establish the Take Our Daughters to Work Day.

    Ms. Steinem never had her own children, and said she never regretted it. “No, not for a millisecond,” she told the AP, describing an incident in which she was afraid to answer that question in front of a group of women in India, fearing they wouldn’t like the answer. “But they applauded,” she said. “It’s important that some of us not have children, to show that we have a choice.”

    In 2000, Ms. Steinem she did something she’d never planned to: She got married, at 66, to British activist and businessman David Bale, whom she met at a fundraiser (Bale was the father of actor Christian Bale.)

    “I thought, ‘I haven’t changed, marriage had changed,’” Ms. Steinem said. “David and I wanted to be together, we loved each other. He needed a green card.” They married at a Cherokee ceremony in Oklahoma. Several years later, he became ill with brain lymphoma, and Ms. Steinem cared for him until his death in 2003.

    Ms. Steinem said she had few regrets in life, but did miss being present when her father died. She received word that he’d been in a serious car accident, but did not respond in time, and he died alone. “I had taken care of my mom as a child, and I feared I’d never come back,” she explained. She was also sorry that she didn’t become closer to her mother. “I was so fearful of becoming her,” she said in an HBO documentary, Gloria: In Her Own Words.

    Ms. Steinem’s books included ‘A Life on the Road’

    Ms. Steinem’s books included the 2015 road memoir A Life on the Road — but she wryly noted at the time that she’d actually never learned to drive. It would have taken away, she said, from her ability to converse with her hosts, who would pick her up from airports or train stations. And, she noted, she always loved to chat with taxi drivers.

    On Jan. 21, 2017, when hundreds of thousands of women gathered in Washington in their pink “pussy hats” for the historic Women’s March, it surprised nobody that the keynote speaker, and the most rousing, was Ms. Steinem.

    “We are linked,” she told the crowd. “And this is a day that will change us forever because we are together.”

    For many women, Ms. Steinem was the galvanizing voice that day. She would go on to advocate fiercely. But, though many saw her as a singular figure in history, she often liked to say that if she hadn’t come along, someone else would have accomplished the same things.

    By the same token, she said, it was less important that younger people listen to her, and more important that they listen to themselves.

    “The primary thing is not that they know who I am,” she said, “but that they know who THEY are.”

  • Russia will close German cultural centers as Moscow and Europe spar over Ukraine

    Russia will close German cultural centers as Moscow and Europe spar over Ukraine

    WARSAW, Poland — Russia will close German cultural centers on its territory, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Thursday in a retaliatory measure reflecting the deepening tensions between Moscow and European countries that are helping Ukraine resist the Kremlin’s 4 ½-year-old invasion.

    Lavrov’s announcement came after Berlin blamed Moscow for an attempted drone attack at Leipzig/Halle Airport on Aug. 4. The explosives-laden drone was found near a Ukrainian plane at the airport, a major international freight hub used for providing support to Ukraine. The drone was later defused.

    Earlier Thursday in Munich, several incendiary devices were thrown at a construction site near a building where several companies, including from the defense sector, are located, the Bavarian State Criminal Police Office said. There was a brief fire that caused no significant damage, police said, adding they suspect the target was one of the companies in the area.

    Two Bulgarian nationals were arrested, police said, but their suspected involvement was not confirmed.

    Western officials have repeatedly accused Moscow of conducting a campaign of sabotage and disruption in their countries with the aim of undermining support for Ukraine and destabilizing European nations, something Russia denies.

    Germany says it has become a “daily target” of the Kremlin’s hybrid campaign.

    It said Wednesday it was closing both the Russian Consulate in Bonn and the Russian House cultural center in the German capital.

    Lavrov countered that cultural centers belonging to Germany’s Goethe-Institut would be closed in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Yekaterinburg, adding that any other response would show a lack of “self-respect” on Russia’s part.

    He told an economic forum in the far east city of Vladivostok that Germany “could not have failed to understand” that closing the center in Berlin would “signify the end of their cultural presence in Russia.”

    Russian President Vladimir Putin said Berlin wants to distract from its own failings and dissatisfaction among voters. Any proof being offered “has been planted,” Putin said.

    Europe increasingly views itself as facing what it calls hybrid attacks by Russia, marked by cyberwarfare and disinformation as well as a conventional military threat. Each side accuses the other of state terrorism.

    The tension has continued for months and grown into a major foreign and defense policy challenge for countries in the European Union.

    Putin is testing the West with tactics that fall “just below the threshold of war” and is determined to “harass NATO members,” the head of Britain’s MI6 spy agency said last year.

    European countries seek to counter Russia’s threat

    Following Germany’s claims, Poland, Denmark, Finland, the U.K., the Czech Republic, and Lithuania have summoned Russian diplomats stationed in their countries.

    In Norway, authorities on Wednesday seized a Russian vessel in the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard at the request of Ukraine’s state-owned Naftogaz energy group.

    A Norwegian court ordered the seizure as part of efforts by Naftogaz to recover a $4.22 billion arbitration award stemming from Russia’s 2014 illegal annexation of Crimea and its seizure of Ukrainian energy assets, including gas fields and pipelines. After Moscow refused to pay the 2023 award, Naftogaz petitioned national courts for orders to seize Russian commercial assets.

    Putin on Thursday compared it to “state terrorism,” and Russia’s Foreign Ministry summoned Norway’s ambassador to Moscow, Heidi Olufsen, to protest the seizure of the vessel, which it said belongs to the state weather and environmental monitoring agency.

    It carried workers, scientists, and cargo to Russian settlements on one of the islands in Svalbard, the ministry said, adding that Moscow “will seek to lift the vessel’s arrest.”

    In Finland, meanwhile, more than 2,000 people took part Thursday in the biggest civil defense exercise in Europe since the end of World War II. Among the threats envisioned were missile strikes from neighboring Russia.

    EU weighs how to respond further

    EU ministers on Wednesday weighed how best to respond to the attempted drone attack but struggled to find new ways to meet the challenge without resorting to military means.

    The EU has slapped almost two dozen packages of sanctions on Russia over the war, targeting over 3,000 officials, oligarchs, and entities including banks, energy companies, and drone makers.

    One senior EU official said the bloc’s anti-terrorism procedures could be put to effective use.

    “If we list individuals as terrorists, we can deploy a range of instruments to actually target those individuals and to track them, all their activities, and people associated with those individuals,” EU Counter-Terrorism Coordinator Bartjan Wegter said.

    He told The Associated Press that EU methods for combating terrorist financing and money laundering, as well as boosting the resilience of infrastructure like airports, could be put to good use.

    “It is a very worrying development,” Wegter said of the failed Leipzig drone attack. But he noted that “it is not new what we’re seeing.”

    Both Russia and Iran have used hybrid warfare methods before, he said.

    “They’re actually deploying terrorist tactics” that are meant to “destabilize our society,” Wegter added.

    Denmark sounds alarm about Russian sabotage plans

    Danish security services are warning that Russian acts of sabotage against the country’s defense industry may be imminent.

    Intelligence services have seen signs of specific planning by Russia to conduct sabotage operations in Denmark, Emil Græsholm, head of counterintelligence at the national security and intelligence service PET, told the Berlingske newspaper.

    The targets are primarily companies in the defense industry and especially those associated with delivering military components to Ukraine, he said.

    Russian Ambassador Vladimir Barbin said PET has not presented any concrete evidence that Moscow was preparing sabotage acts in Denmark. He said Græsholm’s comments were actually an acknowledgement of Denmark’s involvement in Ukraine.

    The transformation of Danish territory into a production and logistics base for the Ukrainian military posed a security risk to Denmark, he added.

    Italy’s Defense Minister Guido Crosetto told AP on Wednesday that the German airport incident was “a very serious act that could have very grave consequences.”

    But he said the threats aren’t discouraging Italy from further helping Kyiv as Rome weighs whether to send SAMP/T air defense batteries. As in other Western countries, limited weapons production capacity is hampering efforts to supply more to Ukraine, he said.

  • EPA proposal could leave the public in the dark on data center plans

    EPA proposal could leave the public in the dark on data center plans

    WASHINGTON — A plan by the Environmental Protection Agency could make it harder for the public to learn about and comment on proposed AI data centers that have sparked backlash in communities across the United States and transformed the midterm election landscape.

    The EPA proposal would eliminate a federal requirement that states notify the public and seek comment before issuing air pollution permits for data centers and other industrial facilities. States could still offer opportunities for public comment, but the EPA would no longer mandate them as a condition for states to grant permits.

    Critics say the move could thwart local residents from learning about proposed data centers or making their voices heard before projects are approved and construction begins. The move comes during a widespread backlash as tech giants build hundreds of massive server warehouses to fuel artificial intelligence and cloud computing.

    “By eliminating the long-standing federal requirement for public notice, this proposal continues efforts by the Trump administration to turn its back on the fundamental EPA principle of transparency,” said Mike Koerber, a former deputy director of EPA’s air quality office.

    If made final, the plan could create “an unlevel playing field where citizens in one state are kept completely in the dark about new data centers and heavy industrial emissions in their backyards, while neighboring states maintain oversight,” he said.

    Under the EPA plan, states with weak or no requirements for public comment could speed permits for data centers, power plants and other pollution sources without consulting the public or even informing communities where the facilities are located, Koerber and other critics said.

    Communities deserve a chance to weigh in, advocates say

    “Data centers and other industrial sources should not be able to get their air pollution permits in secret,” said Keri Powell, senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, an advocacy organization that leads a coalition of nearly 200 environmental, health and community groups that filed comments with the EPA opposing the plan. “Communities deserve a chance to weigh in” before potentially harmful projects are approved.

    An EPA spokesperson called that a false narrative.

    “In our proposal we are saying that states get to pick how they want their permitting process to go for minor sources” of air pollution, spokesperson Carolyn Holran said.

    The EPA proposal does not specifically identify data centers, she said, noting that the plan also would apply to laundromats, car repair shops and even landfills and steel mills that are considered “minor” pollution sources under the federal Clean Air Act.

    The proposal does not demand that states make particular changes to their programs, nor does it alter federal emission standards or weaken environmental protections, Holran said. “Rather, the proposal simply aligns the national program with the Clean Air Act language to ensure that states are in the lead regarding their programs.”

    EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who has made U.S. leadership in AI a top agency priority, said in a statement that the plan is aimed at “cutting unnecessary and burdensome red tape, unleashing American energy and advancing cooperative federalism” with states. The EPA is expected to make the rule final next year.

    President Donald Trump continues to stick up for data centers, even as politicians from both parties criticize them and many communities try to block them. Trump said on social media this week that U.S. communities that don’t have data centers will “end up being backwards and poor.”

    Trump says data centers are crucial in the AI race against China

    Trump has acknowledged that data centers need “a little public relations help” and has pushed tech companies to generate their own electricity to shield consumers from higher utility bills. The Republican president calls data centers critical to winning the AI race against China.

    Environmental groups and other critics say the EPA proposal ignores the reality that many states, particularly in the South and Midwest, don’t require public notice or hearings beyond those set by federal agencies. The federal plan would leave many communities in the dark before data centers show up in their backyards, they said.

    “It’s beyond cruel for Trump’s EPA to silence front-line communities who bear the brunt of unhealthy air,” said Brandon Jones-Cobb, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, another environmental group.

    The EPA “has already turned its back on science, cut enforcement against industrial polluters and eliminated life-saving air pollution measures,” he said. “Now it wants to shut the public out of decisions to build or expand facilities that expose communities to dangerous air pollution, including data centers.”

    Powell, whose organization focuses on six Southern states from Virginia to Alabama, said many states “only do what is required by federal law” when it comes to public notice of land-use projects and other environmental concerns.

    “We rely on a minimum federal requirement to ensure we have environmental protections and a voice,’’ she said in an interview, calling regulation of data centers a crucial issue in a region where the energy-hungry behemoths are proliferating. Virginia and Georgia are both among states with the highest concentration of current and proposed data centers.

    Americans worry data centers could cause pollution, job losses

    Besides powering AI and cloud computing, data centers are often sources of nitrogen oxide, which helps form ozone, as well as carbon monoxide and other air pollutants. Local communities also have expressed concerns about excessive water use and noise from data centers. Many Americans worry that AI could increase economic disparities and cause widespread job losses.

    Data center advocates stress that local taxes paid by the centers can help fund public schools, reducing the financial burden on homeowners.

    Jane Williams, executive director of California Communities Against Toxics, said even if data centers ultimately are approved, “every community should be able to participate robustly in governmental decisions that can pollute our air.’’

    Rolling back the EPA rule “pulls a dark cloud, filled with soot and toxic chemicals, over communities’ right to know what polluting facilities are planned in their community,” she said.

  • A federal judge has blocked Trump’s second try to restrict birthright citizenship

    A federal judge has blocked Trump’s second try to restrict birthright citizenship

    A federal judge in Maryland temporarily blocked much of President Donald Trump’s latest effort to withhold citizenship from babies born in the United States to noncitizen parents, ruling that the Supreme Court had already settled questions reopened by an executive order Trump signed in August.

    While the decision was limited to children born after Feb. 19, 2025, including those born in the future, Judge Deborah L. Boardman wrote that the order would likely affect babies the Supreme Court had already defined as citizens. The ruling delivered a sharp rejection of the president’s renewed efforts to restrict birthright citizenship, after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in July that a previous, more sweeping, executive order from 2025 was unconstitutional.

    “No presidential executive order can undo what the Supreme Court has done,” she wrote.

    Boardman’s order took a dim view of the Trump administration’s reasoning, which she characterized as a thinly veiled attempt to get around the Supreme Court’s decision. She wrote that the president and others named in the lawsuit “completely misread” the majority’s opinion and embraced a “distorted interpretation” of its conclusions.

    In a 35-page opinion, she described the latest order as only the most recent attempt to curtail birthright citizenship by any means that could survive legal scrutiny.

    “Since his second term in office began on January 20, 2025, the president has tried, through executive order, to upend our country’s longstanding tradition of birthright citizenship and eliminate, for large swaths of Americans, the right to citizenship by birth, a right enshrined in the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” she wrote.

    Boardman described a number of ways that children covered by the lawsuit could have their citizenship rescinded, including if the Trump administration moved to label their parents members of terrorist groups or “alien enemies” under arbitrary legal determinations. She cited a pattern in which the administration has accused Venezuelan nationals of being affiliated with the criminal organization Tren de Aragua, often without evidence, in deportation proceedings.

    While she stressed that it was too soon to find that the order itself was unconstitutional, she wrote that it already appeared clear that it was unconstitutional as applied to the class of babies defined when immigration groups initially sued last year to block Trump’s first order.

    The order this year had included other measures to create novel categories of babies that could be disqualified from citizenship, including those born to parents engaged in so-called “birth tourism,” through which mothers deliberately traveled to the United States to give birth.

    It was unclear how the Trump administration planned to tag those it suspected of traveling to the United States to have their children. But Boardman noted that the executive order was broad, describing anyone who engaged in a “commercial transaction” — such as purchasing a plane ticket — as traveling to access birthright citizenship.

    The Supreme Court’s decision upholding birthright citizenship “is the law of the land,” Boardman wrote. “The President must follow it.”

    This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

  • History offers hope for the future of an independent military newspaper

    History offers hope for the future of an independent military newspaper

    On Aug. 21, the Pentagon abruptly terminated Max Lederer, Erik Slavin and Lara Korte, the publisher, editor-in-chief and Middle East correspondent for the military newspaper, Stars and Stripes.

    The Department of Defense justified the firings on the vague grounds of “insubordination,” but in a recent interview, Korte pointed to remarks that the journalists made in a July 5 CBS News segment as the cause for their termination.

    In the interview, Korte had bluntly stated, “I’m working for Stars and Stripes. Not for the Pentagon, not for any administration, not for any policymaker, I am here to cover the military community.” Her notice of termination highlighted these comments. Similarly, Slavin’s notice of termination singled out that he had pledged that a demand from the military not to publish a “perfectly accurate story” would constitute a “red line.”

    Though abrupt, the firings are simply the latest development in an intensifying battle between the Department of Defense and Stars and Stripes’ journalists, who seek to maintain the paper’s editorial independence. In January 2026, the Pentagon announced that it would reform the outlet by removing “woke distractions” and Associated Press reprints. In April, the DOD fired Jacqueline Smith, the paper’s ombudsman.

    With Lederer and Slavin removed, the administration has installed Navy Captain William Urban — a “communication professional” with no formal journalism experience — as deputy publisher.

    Collectively, the Pentagon’s recent moves have constituted an aggressive attack on the editorial integrity of Stars and Stripes; Urban’s appointment does not bode well for the newspaper’s independence. Yet, history suggests that the fight isn’t over. In the past, Stars and Stripes reporters and American troops have checked the Pentagon’s interference by drawing the public’s attention to military overreach and heightened censorship.

    Guy T. Viskniskki, a U.S. Army Officer and member of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), established Stars and Stripes during World War I. General John J. Pershing, the commanding general of the (AEF), quickly endorsed the new publication. In 1918, he issued a directive ordering that military officials abstain from interfering with the paper. This order, however, proved difficult to enforce.

    Though Congress authorized funding for the publication, it has always been housed within the DOD, giving the Pentagon the ability to interfere and exert authority over Stars and Stripes. Consequently, throughout its long history, the newspaper has intermittently struggled against military interference. The unpopularity of the Vietnam War brought frictions between the paper and the military to a breaking point.

    In the late 1960s, military officials attempted to use the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam’s Office of Information (M.A.C.O.I.) to pressure Stars and Stripes reporters into softening stories or shelving them entirely. When the paper ignored these “suggestions,” the relationship between the military command and Stars and Stripes journalists grew tense. One military official infamously labeled the newspaper the “Hanoi Herald” — a reference to its frequently unfavorable combat reports.

    To cut down on the unflattering coverage, the military distanced itself from the journalists; reporters were excluded from news briefings and left in the dark about visits from prominent politicians (including President Richard Nixon, who made a surprise visit to South Vietnam in July 1969).

    Events took a turn for the worse when the paper’s editor — Colonel Peter Sweers — retired and was replaced by the pro-M.A.C.O.I. Colonel William Koch. Sweers had led a team of highly educated civilian and military reporters, many of whom had professional journalism experience and were committed to preserving journalistic integrity.

    Under Koch, however, Stars and Stripes’ policies changed significantly. The new editor forced reporters to wear military uniforms, a change that identified them as enlisted men to higher-ups, thus reinforcing military hierarchies. Additionally, Koch moved the paper’s news bureau out of Saigon to a remote location, effectively removing the journalists from the center of the action, and encouraged his reporters to focus on features, not news stories. Military directives, such as the “Let’s Say It Right” policy, forced reporters to replace straightforward language with euphemisms — “Viet Cong tax collectors became extortionists and search-and-destroy missions became search-and-clear missions.”

    Yet, as the military exerted more power over Stars and Stripes, American troops began pushing back. In October 1969, Private David Dugger, a 21-year-old rifleman from Georgia, told the New York Times, “They’re just not telling it like it is.” Dugger complained that “[l]ots of times we’ve been kicked around by Charlie [the Viet Cong]. But it always comes out sounding like nothing more than a skirmish after the editors are through with it.”

    Made By History sponsors. FOR USE ON MADE BY HISTORY STORIES ONLY.Inquirer Staff

    A few months later, in April 1970, Robert Hodierne — a recently returned Army veteran and a former reporter for Stars and Stripes — published a story in the New York Times chronicling the deterioration of the newspaper’s independence. While it had once been “the one place that GIs could sometimes read about the shooting, bleeding, bombing, gassing, dying, and killing [of the war],” Hodierne wrote, the paper was no longer a reliable source of news.

    The news report quoted Pat Luminello, Stars and Stripes’ civilian bureau chief, who lamented that the military clearly wanted “a pap sheet in which they could air their views and prevent even a hint that all was not wine and roses on the war front.” When news of Hodierne’s piece reached military officials, Koch promptly terminated Luminello, ushering in a period of heightened censorship for Stars and Stripes.

    The firing ignited another round of controversy. That month, the GI-produced, underground-style magazine Grunt Free Press weighed in. In an editorial titled “Should the Troops Get All the News?” the magazine invited GIs to debate the issue. Voicing the “Yes” side, one GI posed a salient question: “If students can tell college presidents the curriculum is lousy and irrelevant, if civil rights marchers can demand more integration, then why shouldn’t a young soldier be allowed enough information to evaluate his establishment, the military?”

    The 1970 censorship episode ended inconclusively. After his firing, Luminello reached out to the House’s freedom of information subcommittee with a five-page list chronicling the military’s various attempts to censor Stars and Stripes. While the subcommittee didn’t force any changes, that didn’t deter the champions of an independent Stars and Stripes.

    Two years later, Sweers, the retired editor, proposed instituting a civilian review board to monitor and check military oversteps. “The chief editor at PS&S,” Sweers explained, “would then know his performance would be regularly examined by a group of leading professionals whose opinions would carry weight with Congress.”

    Congress didn’t immediately adopt Sweers’ recommendation, but over time, the demands of Luminello, Sweers, the troops and subsequent Stars and Stripes reporters and service members paid off. In 1991, Congress created the position of ombudsman for the newspaper. The ombudsman was tasked with monitoring the paper’s editorial independence and reporting concerns to Congress. Since the April firing of Smith, however, the position has remained vacant.

    Today, the question posed by Grunt Free Press in 1970 remains unanswered. Stars and Stripes is a military newspaper intended to give the troops access to the very rights they fight to defend — including their right to a free and independent press. Yet, recurring episodes of heightened censorship, from the Vietnam era to the present day, prove that this freedom is fragile.

    The escalating efforts seem to suggest that Stars and Stripes’ future is bleak. Yet, hope can be found by looking at the response of employees and troops who didn’t back down during the Vietnam War and subsequent periods of military censorship.

    These individuals brought the story of Pentagon interference to the public’s attention and pushed for Congress to make tangible changes to safeguard the newspaper’s independence. Although it took years of pushing, eventually these efforts resulted in the creation of the ombudsman role. It was a reminder that, when troops and journalists resist censorship, Stars and Stripes can regain its independence, even if it’s a slow process.

    Addison M. Jensen is an assistant professor of history at Montana State University. She is currently at work on a monograph titled, “News from ‘The World’: Media, Counterculture, and the American Military in Vietnam,” which uses media and popular culture to examine the experiences of American service members alongside their awareness of the stateside countercultural movements of the era.

    Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of The Inquirer.