Author: Abraham Gutman

  • Trump administration ups security at President’s House after exhibit swap, citing ‘safety concerns’

    Trump administration ups security at President’s House after exhibit swap, citing ‘safety concerns’

    After quietly installing a new exhibit at the President’s House overnight this week, President Donald Trump’s administration is upping security at the embattled site on Independence Mall.

    George Washington’s Philadelphia mansion is flanked by three mobile surveillance trailers. And in an unusual deployment, U.S. Park Police officers in black uniforms are guarding the site alongside National Park Service rangers, who are a familiar fixture at Independence National Historical Park.

    Security is necessary for reducing the risk to the park’s staff and visitors after the installation of new panels to replace the slavery exhibit the Trump administration removed in January, the department said in a notice of intent to make an urgent purchase of two surveillance trailers published Thursday on a federal database.

    “The replacement of these interpretation panels is creating a lot of security concerns … because it requires 24/7 monitoring to ensure the panel replacement is completed, and prevent and limit potential damages outside of normal park operations,” the Department of Interior said in its justification to not review multiple bids.

    The Interior Department intends to purchase the surveillance equipment from Verkada Inc., a California-based security systems company, through distributor Carahsoft Technology Corp.

    The published notice does not include a cost estimate but indicates it will be more than $50,000.

    Park employees installed two surveillance trailers on the west side of the site last week, which they said were for MLB All-Star Game events nearby. In the early morning after the game, the Trump administration swapped the President’s House exhibit.

    The two trailers remained at the very politically sensitive President’s House Site, as the Interior Department refers to it in new public records.

    Park Police officers installed a third on the east side of the site Wednesday morning.

    The presence of Park Police at the site is also a notable change.

    Officer O’Hanlon’s uniform at the site of the President’s House on Thursday.Aidan T. Gallo / Staff Photographer

    The federal law enforcement agency was established by Washington in 1791 to protect federal property in the District of Columbia. It has since been absorbed into the Interior Department, but remains located in the New York City, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco metropolitan areas to “investigate and detain persons suspected of committing offenses against the United States,” according to the National Park Service.

    “Officers also carry out services for many notable events conducted in the national parks,” according to Park Service.

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum placed the force under his direct control in 2025. And the administration has been pushing to hire new recruits as part of an effort to make Park Police “the premier law enforcement agency in D.C.,” the Washington Post reported.

    The National Park Service’s budget justification for this upcoming fiscal year notes that U.S. Park Police are tasked with enhancing security at “iconic national parks” such as at the Liberty Bell and Independence Hall “to address intrusions, vulnerabilities, and potential terrorist threats.”

    But until recently, there has not been a regular U.S. Park Police presence at the President’s House, which is steps from the Liberty Bell, since the Trump administration began scrutinizing the site last summer.

    The president instructed the Interior Department to review all national park displays and flag those that “inappropriately disparage Americans past or living.” The Interior Department’s purchase notice notes that security of the site is important to comply with the order, or else the “White House will elevate issues.”

    The Philadelphia Police Department is not aware of any credible threats to the President’s House Site, spokesperson Sgt. Eric Gripp said, but “federal agencies are also not required to notify us of arrests, citations, staffing decisions, or other enforcement activity.”

    An Interior Department spokesperson declined to answer questions about the Park Police deployment, surveillance system, or the risk assessment.

    Temperature rising

    Brian Wallace has been visiting the site nearly every day since January to post protest signs on the walls that once displayed an exhibit about the nine people Washington enslaved at the executive mansion.

    Park staff would remove the poster almost every night — he even uses masking tape to make the task easier, he said — but no one bothered the 65-year-old.

    But Tuesday, he was approached by a group of officers wearing black, unlike the gray-and-green uniforms of the Park rangers he is accustomed to seeing.

    After taping five or six posters, a U.S. Park Police officer instructed him to stop.

    When Wallace invoked his First Amendment right to free speech, the situation got “a lot more confrontation.”

    “A bunch more officers arrived,” he said. “At that point I was threatened with arrest.”

    Sandra Shachar, 72, cited for vandalism at the President’s House Site on Wednesday for attempting to post news articles on the walls.Abraham Gutman

    Wallace eventually left without an arrest or citation, but Sandra Shachar wasn’t so lucky the next day.

    Shachar, 72, has been taping news articles about the litigation surrounding the President’s House since January too. But Wednesday, hours after the Trump administration swapped the exhibit, she was fined $305 for vandalism by two park rangers.

    “I think it highlights the state that we’re in as a country, where our right to free speech is now impeded,” the local psychologist said.

    And a couple hours later, park rangers did not allow Michael Coard, a leader of Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, a group that has fought to develop and protect the President’s House exhibit, to deliver remarks from the site.

    The rangers said they would cite speakers if the event proceeded within the site’s parameters.

    “I gotta tell you, I’ve been doing this since June of 2002,” Coard said to the officer. “Never heard of it.”

    Lawyer Michael Coard advocates for his First Amendment rights to gather and speak freely at the President’s House Site, where Coard and others planned a news conference Wednesday to address the installation of new panels.Jessica Griffin / Staff Photographer

    The group moved closer to the Liberty Bell Center’s entrance, and the rangers allowed the event to take place.

    Later Wednesday night, the President’s House Coalition, composed of a group of advocates and stakeholders who have been working to protect the site, told its Instagram followers to “be mindful of Trump’s administration’s tactics” and the “heavy presence” of federal officers at the site.

    “Don’t let them bait you into getting arrested,” the activist group account said. “We’d fight to get you out of jail *laughing emoji* but we’d rather spend out energy on fighting against Trump’s administration.”

  • What’s changed at the President’s House with the Trump administration’s new exhibit

    What’s changed at the President’s House with the Trump administration’s new exhibit

    The National Park Service removed early Wednesday the few panels that remained from the slavery exhibit at the President’s House, and replaced them with new panels.

    The original displays were deemed to “inappropriately disparage Americans past or living” following President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order on “restoring truth and sanity to American history.”

    The newly installed panels include 11 whose renderings were published on the National Park Service’s website and first reported by The Inquirer in April, as well as smaller panels that weren’t previously made public. Among those are additional references to the nine people George Washington enslaved in his Philadelphia home.

    Historians previously criticized the panels for minimizing the brutality of slavery and whitewashing Washington’s culpability in the institution.

    And according to advocates, the additions don’t change much.

    Telling a blatant lie, such as claiming slavery didn’t exist, would be too easily exposed, said Michael Coard, a founding member of Avenging Our Ancestors, a group that advocated for the development of the site.

    “The best lie is one that has a little bit of truth,” Coard said.

    The new panels make light of slavery, the attorney said, and focus on Washington’s “discomfort” instead of the experience of the nine people the United States‘ first president enslaved in Philadelphia.

    Others criticized the panels for drifting away from the site’s original purpose.

    When the site open in 2010, the city and National Park Service said the President’s House exhibit “pays tribute” and “honors lives of enslaved Africans in presidential household.”

    The Department of Interior said Wednesday the new panels “acknowledge the evils of slavery, including its injustices and hypocrisies, and, by telling the stories of the nine slaves that Washington kept in the President’s House, remind us of their essential humanity.”

    The Inquirer photographed the original panels before their removal and the new panels that were installed this week. Here are the differences in the exhibit.

    What’s gone

    The original exhibit included five screens across the site that played reenactments depicting the daily lives of those enslaved at Washington’s Philadelphia home.

    “The site had to tell the stories that are not often told and share the perspectives of the people who up to now have been nameless and voiceless,” said Rosalyn McPherson, the site’s project director, in the 2010 news release.

    Those screens were turned off.

    Also gone are the artistic panels, which included a portrait of Ona Judge, who escaped from slavery at the house, and another about Washington’s signing of the Fugitive Slave Act.

    Workers remove the display of panel for Ona Judge at the President’s House in Independence National Historical Park in January.Tom Gralish / Staff Photographer

    What’s replaced

    The removed panels included information about the suffering of enslaved people.

    A panel titled “The Dirty Business of Slavery” included information about the slave trade, the constitutional compromise to appease slaveholders, the growth of the enslaved population during the presidencies of Washington and John Adams (who also lived at the President’s House), and a timeline of slavery from 1619 and through emancipation.

    Another panel, titled “Life Under Slavery,” discussed the brutality of the notorious institution, resistance efforts, and slavery in Philadelphia.

    It told the story of Absalom Jones and Richard Allen, men who were born into slavery and managed to buy their own freedom.

    “Enslaved people of African descent in the North, deprived of fundamental freedom, endured profoundly difficult lives,” the panel read. ”Controlled by others, their families were always threatened by forced separation, and their work, often exhausting, was nearly always unpaid.”

    Those panels were replaced with ones that include broad descriptions of slavery that do little to unpack the experience of those subjected to it, and focus on the triumph of emancipation.

    The new “Fighting for Freedom” panel discusses the Underground Railroad, quotes Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln’s rise to the presidency, and the Emancipation Proclamation.

    Another panel about “The Constitution and Slavery” begins by stating: “The words ‘slave’ and ‘slavery’ are not in the U.S. Constitution as ratified, nor the word ‘property’ in connection with language alluding to slavery.”

    It discusses “compromises with pro-slavery delegates,” and ends with a section titled “fulfilling the promise” that quotes the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech.

    A panel about “Slavery in the British Colonies” pays homage to Benjamin Franklin and Black abolitionists, and shows the declining numbers of enslaved people in Philadelphia between 1767 and 1847.

    And in a trio of displays called “History Lost & Found,” the Trump administration focuses on how the 2007 archaeological dig of the site worked and discovery of primary sources documents it presents as non-controversial: Washington’s letters and a map of the property.

    Unlike the original panels about the archaeological dig, the new ones have no mention of slavery, the nine people Washington enslaved, or the National Park Service’s initial apprehension about helping to develop the memorial.

    But starkest difference comes in the treatment of slavery at the President’s House itself.

    An original panel included a timeline of the site’s history from the time Indigenous people lived in the area and through the 2002 discovery of slavery at Washington’s household.

    It continued to discuss the collaboration between the city, federal government, and community groups to develop the site.

    The panel’s section on slavery at the house focused on George and Martha Washington ownership of enslaved people, the president’s secret efforts to evade Pennsylvania’s Gradual Abolition Act, and the escapes of Ona Judge and Hercules.

    In contrast, the new panel titled “The Executive Mansion” follows a mention of slavery at the house with a statement that Washington’s views evolved and that he freed his slaves in his will.

    Another new panel that addresses “Presidents Washington and Adams on Slavery” head on says Washington was “caught between his private doubts about slavery and his public responsibilities as president” and privately “often expressed discomfort with the institution.”

    “Slaves living in the President’s House experienced a greater modicum of autonomy than elsewhere in the South such as to explore the city and sometimes even attend the theater, with Washington buying the tickets,” the panel reads.

    On the same wall, a new smaller panels lists the nine people Washington enslaved alongside short bios. The panel tells visitors that Washington “knew and trusted his enslaved house staff,” and repeats that he used to “buy them tickets to the circus and the theater.”

    The wall also includes a smaller panels that briefly tells escape stories of Judge and Hercules, and references Washington’s attempt to recapture them.

    What’s new

    Multiple panels throughout the exhibit share facts about U.S. history, but bear no connection to the site or slavery. These include “Celebrating Independence” and “Throughout the Years,” which denote the nation’s 100, 150, and 200 year celebrations.

    And a series of panels provide a civic lesson about the history, powers, and role of the commander in chief. Another panel discusses “the need for an executive branch.”

    New panels detail the biographies of George and Martha Washington, John and Abigail Adams, and Benedict Arnold. The biography of William Howe, a British commander who occupied Philadelphia during the Revolutionary War and lived at the President’s House, is also attached to the wall.

    Finally, the new exhibit pays homage to Robert Morris, known as the “financier of the American revolution” and offered Washington the house as the executive mansion with a panel dedicated to his biography.

    Morris’ ownership of a company that traded slaves is never mentioned.

    A detailed image of one of the new panels installed by the National Park Service at the President’s House this week.Aidan T. Gallo / Staff Photographer
  • President’s House advocates vow to keep fighting despite the new exhibit — and a vandalism citation

    President’s House advocates vow to keep fighting despite the new exhibit — and a vandalism citation

    Sandra Shachar has been posting news articles on the walls of the President’s House Site almost every day since January.

    She was outraged that President Donald Trump’s administration had dismantled the exhibit telling the story of the nine people George Washington enslaved in his executive mansion at Sixth and Market Streets, and sharing information with visitors was her way to push back.

    When she arrived at Independence Mall on Wednesday morning, new panels were on the historic site’s walls. The National Park Service had installed a new exhibit before dawn.

    But Shachar, 72, continued with her routine. This time, two park rangers stopped her.

    “When I went to tape my sign up, they came and said, ‘You can’t do that. Please stop,’” the psychologist from Center City said.

    Sandra Shachar, 72, cited for vandalism at the President’s House site on July 15, 2026 for attempting to post news articles on the walls.Abraham Gutman

    The rangers issued Shachar a citation for vandalism, which carried a $305 fine, and warned her that next time she could be arrested.

    The news came as a gut punch.

    “It was something I could do,” Shachar said. “And now for doing something, I’m issued a citation that says I have created vandalism on federal property.”

    The vandalism citation marks an escalation in the National Park Service’s response to protest at the President’s House, and comes as activists promise to keep the fight over the site’s history alive.

    The National Park Service installed the new exhibit early Wednesday, hours after the city hosted MLB All-Star Game events near the site.

    Michael Coard, leader of Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, a group that has fought to develop and protect the President’s House exhibit, spoke at the site shortly after noon and vowed resistance.

    “I don’t care whether you’re a Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative … this is some scary [expletive],” Coard said. “Despite being very afraid, we got to keep fighting.”

    Fascist leaders throughout history have attempted to rewrite the past as part of their campaign to control the future, the attorney said. And that is the level of threat the Trump administration’s changes to the President’s House represent, Coard said.

    The new panels have been criticized for minimizing the brutality of slavery, whitewashing George Washington’s culpability, and shifting the focus away from the nine people who were kept in bondage at the nation’s first executive mansion.

    It is outrageous that visitors will see panels that, for example, discuss Washington’s “discomfort” with slavery and suggest the lives of those enslaved in Philadelphia were not too bad, Coard said.

    “The fact that the federal government would ignore the hell of slavery for the victim but highlight the president’s ‘discomfort,’” Coard said. “What kind of nonsense is that?”

    Avenging the Ancestors Coalition’s goal continues to be the full restoration of the site with the original panels that had been developed through partnership with the city and input from the community. The group is exploring new legal strategies, Coard said.

    The city is also not done fighting, Mayor Cherelle L. Parker said in a statement.

    Her administration plans to ask the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for a new hearing, giving city attorneys a chance to argue their case again.

    A three-judge panel held that the city has no rights over the site and dismissed all but one count in Philadelphia’s underlying lawsuit.

    Security cameras that have been placed at the President’s House site, where new panels have been installed, in Philadelphia, July 15, 2026. Historians and advocates have criticized the new panels for minimizing Washington’s role as an enslaver.Jessica Griffin / Staff Photographer

    The case raises “serious legal issues” that go beyond the President’s House, Parker said.

    “I will continue fighting on behalf of everyone who supports the core belief: All of our history must be told,” the mayor’s statement said.

    It will be up to the Third Circuit to decide whether to grant a second hearing to an issue that three judges had agreed on unanimously.

    The efforts to educate visitors about the President’s House continue as well.

    Old City Remembers, a grassroots effort, will continue to register volunteers to read aloud the text of the removed signs. And the Black Journey: African-American Walking Tour of Philadelphia will continue to offer tours that tell the story of those enslaved at the site.

    Brian Wells, 65, has been putting up protest posters on the President’s House walls since the day after the January removal. On Tuesday, Wells said, national park police stopped him from taping papers and threatened him with arrest.

    He thought the heightened security was because of an MLB All-Star event held Tuesday on Independence Mall, but now that the panels have been replaced, he isn’t so sure.

    “I will continue with Old City Remembers folks to volunteer to read aloud the text from the former panels,” Wells said Wednesday. “Other actions? I don’t know at this point.”

  • Gov. Shapiro can’t be sued by his Abington neighbors over a property dispute, judge rules. But Josh Shapiro, a homeowner, can.

    Gov. Shapiro can’t be sued by his Abington neighbors over a property dispute, judge rules. But Josh Shapiro, a homeowner, can.

    A federal judge had some good news this week for Josh Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania, but not so much for Josh Shapiro, resident of Montgomery County.

    Shapiro, as governor, cannot be sued in his official capacity in a dispute over a strip of yard between his and his Abington Township neighbors’ adjoining properties, U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III ruled Tuesday.

    But Shapiro and his wife, Lori, will still have to face their neighbors in federal court as homeowners, Bartle also determined.

    The conflict came into public view in February, when Jeremy and Simone Mock, whose backyard abuts the Shapiros’ lawn in a tree-lined neighborhood near Pennsylvania State University’s Abington campus, sued Shapiro — both as governor and in his individual capacity — and George Bivens, acting Pennsylvania State Police commissioner. The lawsuit alleged the officials were illegally occupying part of the Mocks’ yard to build an eight-foot security fence last summer in what they claimed was an “outrageous abuse of power” that violated their constitutional rights. Bartle dismissed those claims in his ruling Tuesday, in what Shapiro’s administration called a major win.

    But while Shapiro and Bivens are immune from the federal lawsuit as state officials, Shapiro as an individual and his wife are not, Bartle’s opinion said.

    “We are pleased that the court has dismissed the claims against the office of the governor and the Pennsylvania State Police, and recognize that the allegations against these officials are without merit,” said Rosie Lapowsky, a spokesperson for Shapiro. “The Shapiros are confident that the facts will ultimately show that the Mocks’ remaining claims are meritless and politically motivated and will fail.”

    The dispute in federal court over the 2,900-square-foot strip of land disrupted the otherwise sleepy suburban neighborhood and led to a separate lawsuit in Montgomery County Court filed by the Shapiros, in their personal capacities, against the Mock family. Shapiro’s office has called the Mocks’ legal effort a political stunt, in addition to other efforts by Republican officials to scrutinize the safety measures state police say are needed to keep Shapiro and his family safe.

    The dueling lawsuits came in the wake of the attempted murder of Shapiro in April 2025 at the state-owned governor’s residence in Harrisburg, when a man firebombed the mansion on the first night of Passover while the governor and his extended family slept inside.

    The attack prompted more than $33 million in security upgrades to the state-owned governor’s residence, in addition to $1 million in upgrades and landscaping to Shapiro’s personal home in Abington Township, where he and his family live part-time.

    Shapiro’s safety remains a priority for state police, as one of the nation’s most prominent Jewish elected officials. A Delaware County man was arrested Wednesday for threatening to burn down the governor’s residence, state police said.

    But the Mocks’ attorney, Wally Zimolong, said the lawsuit at hand is about property rights and due process, and called Bartle’s ruling a “strong decision.”

    “Make no mistake about it,” Zimolong said, “a federal court has said that the sitting governor of Pennsylvania can be held liable for damages over constitutional violations.”

    The Delaware County lawyer who has represented high-profile Republican officials and candidates, including President Donald Trump, said it is “nonsense” to call the litigation political. Zimolong added that he hopes the Shapiros reconsider and attempt to resolve the case amicably.

    The conflict’s origins

    The dispute between the Shapiros and Mocks began last summer when, as part of a plan to build a security fence at the Abington house, a surveyor learned that a sliver of yard that the Shapiros had used for over two decades was actually on property belonging to the Mocks.

    After the Mocks rejected the Shapiros’ offer to buy the land, court fillings said, Pennsylvania’s first couple invoked a state law that allows a person to gain ownership of a property they have actively used for at least 21 years. The Shapiros have lived in their Montgomery County home for 23 years.

    “What followed was an outrageous abuse of power by the sitting Governor of Pennsylvania and its former Attorney General,” the Mocks’ February lawsuit said.

    (function() { var l = function() { new pym.Parent( ‘shapiroyard__graphic’, ‘https://media.inquirer.com/storage/inquirer/ai2html/shapiroyard/index.html’); }; if(typeof(pym) === ‘undefined’) { var h = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0], s = document.createElement(‘script’); s.type = ‘text/javascript’; s.src = ‘https://pym.nprapps.org/pym.v1.min.js’; s.onload = l; h.appendChild(s); } else { l(); } })();

    A security fence was purchased but never installed, SpotlightPA reported. Instead, contractors hired by the state began planting arborvitae-type trees and other plants on the Mocks’ property. State police also flew drones over the Mocks’ property, threatened to remove healthy trees, and chased away contractors, the Mocks alleged in the suit.

    The complaint also accused Shapiro of directing state police to patrol the property, and instructing the Mocks to leave the “security zone.”

    The Shapiros’ countersuit in Montgomery County asks a judge to find that they are the “legal and equitable owners” of the area in dispute, having tended to the land that borders their front yard for 23 years. That suit is pending and a judge is expected to rule on preliminary objections filed by Zimolong.

    Separately, the Shapiros and state attorneys filed motions asking Bartle to dismiss the federal complaint against them.

    This week, the judge partially obliged, finding the state officials to be immune from the lawsuit while allowing the case against the Shapiros to proceed.

    The judge also refused to freeze the federal case while the lawsuit in Montgomery County plays out, determining that the two cases are different enough to proceed.

    “The claims here extend far beyond a disagreement between neighbors over the metes and boundaries of their properties,” Bartle wrote.

  • A W hotel building contractor is hit with another court judgment, this time for $42.4 million

    A W hotel building contractor is hit with another court judgment, this time for $42.4 million

    One of the largest building contractors in the United States has been hit by another multimillion judgment as a result of the dispute over the W and Element hotels in Center City.

    Philadelphia Common Pleas Judge James Crumlish III ordered California-based Tutor Perini Building Corp. to pay $42.4 million in damages to the subcontractor retained to install the building’s exterior, the Chicago-based Ventana DBS LLC.

    “Throughout the project, Ventana was forced to navigate numerous obstructions and obstacles, stemming from Tutor Perini’s pervasive material breaches of contract,” Crumlish’s ruling read last week.

    That judgment comes on top of a $174.7 million judgment Crumlish issued earlier this year for 2,797 days of construction delays to the 51-story building, to be paid to Philadelphia-based Chestlen Development LP.

    A Tutor Perini spokesperson said in April that the firm disagreed with the decision and intended to appeal it.

    The contractor declined to comment on the new developments.

    “This ruling is an important affirmation of the facts and of the principles that govern successful project delivery,” said Bob Clark, executive chairman of Clayco, a real estate development company that is Ventana’s parent company.

    “We are pleased that the Court awarded Ventana $42 million in damages and recognized that Tutor Perini failed to properly coordinate its subcontractors while acting in bad faith by concealing its knowledge of significant concrete defects,” said Clark.

    The judgment is the latest in the fallout from a construction project that Crumlish has said in an earlier ruling went “off the rails” because of Tutor Perini. Five years after the W hotel opened, the litigation is ongoing.

    Tutor Perini was in court again Tuesday for the start of a new trial, this time for the judge to assess how much a concrete subcontractor, Thomas P. Carney Inc. Construction, owes Tutor for botching the job.

    The proceeding had a tense opening as attorneys for Tutor Perini and Carney spent the morning arguing over motions.

    Crumlish, who has previously chastised the parties for their animosity and turning the litigation into a “challenging behemoth,” expressed frustrations at times and ordered everyone to stop talking.

    “I’m getting cranky, I will admit it,” the judge said at one point.

    Disruptive and costly delays

    Tutor Perini retained Ventana in 2015 for $14 million to assist in the design and installation of the building’ exterior and window-wall systems for floors nine to 50.

    But when Ventana moved to install the hotel’s wall-window systems, they immediately noticed a “big problem,” according to the judge’s October memo. In many places, the concrete was not level or did not meet the elevation requirements in the design.

    Tutor Perini denied there was a problem, while quietly attempting to grind the edges of the concrete slabs to address the issue.

    By failing to supervise the concrete pours, Crumlish wrote in the recent ruling, Tutor Perini caused the “inefficient, obstructed, and impaired installation” of the window-wall systems.

    “Ventana repeatedly encountered disruptive and costly delays due to Tutor’s lack of coordination while attempting to install its window wall systems,” the judge’s memo said.

    Tutor Perini, for example, didn’t clear debris left by other subcontractors, the judge said, to allow the Ventana team to transport the window-wall components.

    And while Tutor’s consultants confirmed the problem was the concrete pour, the company rejected Ventana’s delay notices and stopped paying the contractor.

    Crumlish ordered Tutor to pay Ventana the $7.5 million unpaid subcontractor balance, $7.3 million in labor inefficiency costs, and $2.4 million unpaid change order requests, and $18 million in other costs.

    The company is also on the hook for $7.1 million in attorney’s fees, expert witness fees, and litigation costs, bringing the total judgment to $42.4 million.

    The W hotel opened in 2021 at 15th and Chestnut Streets, three years after its intended opening date, and it still cannot be fully occupied because some window vents are inoperable.

    The project was developed by Brook Lenfest, son of former Inquirer owner H.F. “Gerry” Lenfest, whose foundation continues to own the newspaper.

    Editor’s note: This article has been updated with a statement from the subcontractor Ventana’s parent company.

  • Hackers stole private information of more than 50,000 clients from a Philly-based law firm, lawsuits say

    Hackers stole private information of more than 50,000 clients from a Philly-based law firm, lawsuits say

    Cybercriminals duped a Blank Rome attorney into sharing the personal information of 57,554 former and current clients, two federal lawsuits filed Monday say.

    The firm, which is headquartered in Philadelphia and has 15 other offices nationwide, notified impacted clients a month after the incident, according to the complaints.

    The two nearly identical proposed class-action lawsuits, filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by former Blank Rome clients from California, accuse the firm of negligence, breach of contract, and violation of consumer protection laws, among other claims.

    Blank Rome failed to use industry standards for cybersecurity and to comply with safeguards mandated by a federal medical privacy law, according to the complaints. It also didn’t appropriately train staff to identify these types of cyber schemes, the suits said.

    The lawsuits asks a judge to certify the class action on behalf of all people impacted by the breach, award them damages, and order action to ensure their identities are protected.

    “The exposure of one’s Private Information to cybercriminals is a bell that cannot be unrung,” the suits say. “Before this data breach, its current, former, and prospective clients’ Private Information was exactly that — private. Not anymore.”

    The incident was limited to one attorney and the firm’s network was never breached, a Blank Rome spokesperson said.

    “We are committed to protecting our clients’ information and maintaining the trust they place in us,” the firm’s statement said. “We believe the lawsuit has no merit and will aggressively defend against it.”

    The firm disputed that all people impacted were clients, but did not say who else was impacted.

    The attorney who filed the two lawsuits did not respond to a request for comment.

    Class-action lawsuits following cybersecurity breaches have become increasingly common. Earlier this year, Comcast agreed to pay $117.5 million to settle two dozen suits over a 2023 data breach, and the University of Pennsylvania was sued multiple times over an October breach that impacted fewer than 10 people.

    They are also lucrative for class attorneys who can pocket as much as a third of the settlement’s amount.

    The Blank Rome data breach took place on May 21 after an “unauthorized third party” posing as a member of the firm’s IT department instructed a Blank Rome attorney to upload files to an external Google Drive, according to a notice of breach attached to the complaint.

    Clients began receiving notice on June 26, the suits say.

    The firm identified the breach within two hours, deleted all the files on the drive, and opened an investigation, the notice said. Blank Rome also notified law enforcement.

    The notice was sent to clients whose information, which included names and Social Security numbers, was stolen. Clients’ addresses, dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, passport numbers, and medical and health insurance information were also potentially obtained by the hackers, the notice said.

    Blank Rome provided complimentary credit monitoring to impacted clients, the notices said, and has taken internal steps “mitigating similar risk,” including by working with cybersecurity professionals.

    “We are notifying you of this incident and want to assure you that we take it seriously,” the firm’s notice said.

  • Trump administration gets final legal OK to install own panels at President’s House, city appeals

    Trump administration gets final legal OK to install own panels at President’s House, city appeals

    A Philadelphia-based federal appeals court gave President Donald Trump’s administration the final go-ahead to install its own exhibit at the President’s House.

    The new panels, which historians have criticized for whitewashing George Washington’s role in enslaving nine people, have been manufactured and stand ready to install, the Justice Department told the court.

    The procedural step, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit took on an observed federal holiday, followed a Thursday request by Justice Department attorneys to allow the National Park Service to “begin work immediately and install its new exhibits.” The Third Circuit ruled last month that the city has no rights over the President’s House.

    “The President’s House is an important national historical site, and the Government submits that the President’s House exhibits should be fully installed without further delay,” the government’s filing said.

    Only two of 11 new panels mention the people enslaved at the President’s House, which was the exhibit’s original purpose. The exhibits are not factually wrong, historians said, but cast Washington in a more sympathetic light.

    “Slaves living in the President’s House experienced a greater modicum of autonomy than elsewhere in the South such as to explore the city and sometimes even attend the theater, with Washington buying the tickets,” one panel reads.

    The city quickly appealed and asked the Third Circuit court to recall the Friday-morning order, saying it didn’t have time to respond to the Justice Department’s Thursday request.

    And while the federal government asked to install the exhibits “immediately,” the request did not identify a reason for the rush.

    “That is not an emergency,” the city’s filing said, “it is a preference for speed.”

    The court shouldn’t have issued its final approval for changes without waiting the 90 days Philadelphia had to appeal last month’s order, the filing said.

    The city also repeated the argument, which has not found purchase with the appellate judges so far, that allowing the Trump administration to install its own exhibit would cause the city and public irreparable harm.

    The city’s motion does not automatically pause the court’s order.

    But in addition, the city filed a motion for a stay, while the Third Circuit considers the appeal, with District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe, who issued the now-vacated injunction ordering the Trump administration to restore the exhibits it had removed.

    The city and the Department of the Interior did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    The President’s House has been subject to litigation in federal courts since the Trump administration dismantled the slavery exhibit in January.

    It has been in legal limbo in recent weeks because of litigation in a Boston federal court, where conservation groups sued to stop the Interior Department’s implementation of Trump’s 2025 executive order requiring no national parks displays that “inappropriately disparage Americans past or living.”

    At least 50 exhibits were removed from more than 30 sites nationwide, according to court records. Among them are also mentions of slavery at Independence Hall and the Second National Bank of the United States that the Trump administration quietly removed.

    A federal judge in Boston last month ordered the National Park Service to restore all removed exhibits to parks across the nation. But the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit disagreed and stayed that order Thursday.

    Hours later, Justice Department attorneys asked the Philadelphia-based federal court to clear the final procedural step — and the court obliged before noon Friday.

    The biggest question remaining is whether the Trump administration will attempt to install the panel during this historic July 4 weekend marking the United States’ 250th anniversary.

  • The last legal obstacle for the Trump administration’s own President’s House panels has been removed

    The last legal obstacle for the Trump administration’s own President’s House panels has been removed

    The President’s House has been in legal limbo for weeks.

    Even though a Philly-based federal appeals court gave the green light to President Donald Trump’s administration to install its proposed panels to replace the slavery exhibit National Park Service staff dismantled in January, federal litigation out of Boston placed any actual changes to the site on hold.

    That obstacle was lifted Thursday by a Boston-based federal appeals court, just two days before the nation’s 250th anniversary celebration, and the Trump administration wasted no time.

    Hours after the ruling out of Massachusetts, Justice Department attorneys asked the Philadelphia-based Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to take the final procedural step so the National Park Service “may begin work immediately and install its new exhibits.”

    The Third Circuit ruled last month that Philadelphia doesn’t have rights over the President’s House exhibit, and approved the Trump administration’s proposed panels, which historians criticized for whitewashing George Washington’s own culpability in the enslavement of nine people in his Philadelphia home.

    That ruling vacated a Philadelphia federal district court judge’s February injunction that ordered the National Park Service to restore the President’s House site to its state before any panels were removed in January.

    The federal government on Thursday requested the “immediate issuance” of a procedural order that would enable it to begin installing new panels and said it hadn’t done so before because of the ongoing litigation in New England.

    Still, it’s unclear when the new exhibits could be fixed to the historical site’s walls.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of the Interior did not respond to questions about when the National Park Service intended to install the new exhibit and the time the installation would require.

    Instead, the spokesperson shared a statement saying the Interior Department had “encouraged Americans to visit our cultural and historic sites and engage in meaningful conversations about the moments that have shaped our country.”

    The new panels have been manufactured, Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory in den Berken said in last month’s Third Circuit hearing.

    A spokesperson for Philadelphia’s Law Department said the city was reviewing its options.

    The change that led to the Justice Department’s request came from the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, where a three-judge panel ruled the federal government does not have to reinstall before July Fourth exhibits the Trump administration had removed from national parks as part of its efforts to remove displays that “inappropriately disparage Americans past or living.”

    At least 50 exhibits were removed from more than 30 sites nationwide, according to court records.

    The First Circuit previously issued an administrative stay on most of a lower-court ruling that halted the Trump administration’s changes to the parks. Such stays are a way for an appeals court to maintain a status quo while the judges study the case.

    But the new order, which stays the entire ruling, is based on the arguments and facts of the case.

    The First Circuit rejected the Boston district judge‘s finding that anything but restoring the exhibits nationwide would cause irreparable harm.

    The district judge’s ruling ordered the National Park Service to “undertake a burdensome reinstallation and restoration project in short order,” the First Circuit ruling said, while the conservation groups that brought the lawsuit could not show they would be harmed directly by exhibits’ absence or alterations.

    The First Circuit judges assigned to the case were Chief Judge David J. Barron, appointed by Barack Obama, and Joe Biden appointees Gustavo A. Gelpí Jr. and Julie Rikelman.

    The ruling is “merely a temporary procedural setback,” said Brooke Menschel, an attorney with Democracy Forward that represents the conservation groups.

    “Unfortunately, for now, the decision allows the administration to continue removing and altering interpretive materials that are critical for millions of visitors to understand our nation’s history, right at the moment when so many Americans will be enjoying the parks over the upcoming semiquincentennial weekend,” Menschel said in a statement.

    Mayor Cherelle L. Parker vowed to “pursue every legal action possible” in an effort to reverse last month’s Third Circuit ruling.

    So far, Parker’s administration has not taken any action. Legal experts noted that none of the administration’s options are a slam dunk.

    One option would be to file an emergency stay request with the U.S. Supreme Court, which would be up to conservative Justice Samuel Alito to decide.

  • Philly can’t force ICE agents to unmask, federal judge rules

    Philly can’t force ICE agents to unmask, federal judge rules

    Philadelphia can’t prevent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and other federal officers from concealing their identities, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

    U.S. District Judge Chad F. Kenney issued an order preventing Mayor Cherelle L. Parker’s administration and District Attorney Larry Krasner’s office from barring federal law enforcement officers from wearing masks, intentionally covering their badges, or using unmarked vehicles.

    The U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause prevents states — or a city in this case — from imposing requirements on how federal agencies carry out their duties, the judge appointed by President Donald Trump said.

    When City Council passed the bill in April as part of the ICE Out legislative package, the lawmakers “attempted to sidestep the Constitution’s clear mandate and disregarded this fundamental principle of law that has informed American jurisprudence for over 200 years,” Kenney’s opinion said.

    Parker allowed the bill to become law without her signature, following City Solicitor Renee Garcia’s advice that signing the bill “would send an inaccurate signal to the public that the Administration can legally and practically enforce” its provisions.

    “Mayor Cherelle Parker acted with civic wisdom and courage to stand up for the Constitution and follow the rule of law to where it led, despite what may have been strong personal inclinations to the contrary,” the judge said.

    While the ordinance’s requirements apply to all law enforcement, its inclusion in an “ICE Out” package suggested the city planned to be selective in its enforcement, Kenney said.

    And even though the ordinance hadn’t taken effect yet, the judge said, the city never said it wouldn’t attempt to enforce its provision. Krasner’s past statements vowing to “arrest” and “put handcuffs” on ICE officers who break state law, as well as his involvement in a progressive prosecutors’ group committed to such prosecutions, suggest the threat of enforcement is real, Kenney said.

    “The Department of Justice will keep fighting jurisdictions that try to obstruct President Trump’s immigration enforcement with policies that endanger agents and public safety,” a department spokesperson said.

    The city is reviewing the ruling and potential next steps, a law department spokesperson said.

    Kenney showed an “unnecessary urgency” from the beginning of the case, Krasner said.

    “The red-hot rush of this federal district court judge, a Delaware County Republican appointed by Donald Trump, was predictable,” the district attorney said.

    Defending the ordinance put Parker and her administration in an awkward position. City Council passed the legislation with a veto-proof supermajority as part of a seven-bill package.

    The ordinance at the heart of the litigation made it a crime for law enforcement officers, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, to wear face coverings or conceal personal identifiers like badges and nameplates while carrying out their official duties in Philadelphia, and required officers to identify themselves. It also prohibited the use of unmarked vehicles.

    The bill included exceptions allowing officers to wear masks in certain circumstances, such as medical emergencies or SWAT operations.

    An officer could face up to 90 days in jail plus a fine for violating the ordinance.

    The other bills prohibit federal immigration agencies from staging raids on city-owned property, ban discrimination on the basis of citizenship status, and prohibit the city from engaging in most forms of information-sharing with ICE.

    The legislation also codified some of Philadelphia’s long-standing sanctuary city status, which a recent poll found most city residents support.

    Parker signed the six other bills, which will take effect Tuesday.

    Kendra Brooks shown here during a press conference at City Hall to announce a package of bills aimed at pushing back against ICE enforcement in Philadelphia, January 27, 2026.Jessica Griffin / Staff Photographer

    The Justice Department sued the city, Parker, Krasner, and Garcia in federal court in Philadelphia last month and requested an injunction on the enforcement of the masking bill.

    Officials from various federal agencies told the court the bill would harm their operations and officers.

    Members of the public routinely dox ICE agents, who are later subject to threats, John Rife, acting director of ICE’s Philadelphia field office, said in a filing.

    “Facial coverings reduce the risk of officers’ personal identities being shared publicly, which helps ensure that officers’ privacy and safety, and that of their family members, remains intact,” Rife said.

    The city argued the litigation was premature as the ordinance hasn’t gone into effect and there was no attempt to enforce it.

    The city also said federal agents had applied “aggressive enforcement tactics behind the mask of anonymity, undermining public safety and trust.”

    But Kenney’s opinion said, “there can be no public interest” in enforcing a provision that violates the Constitution.

    It doesn’t make sense that the city can’t hold federal officers to the same standard it holds its own police department to, Councilmember Rue Landau, who authored the bills with fellow progressive Kendra Brooks, said in a statement.

    The Trump administration has sued other jurisdictions, including New Jersey, over similar requirements. In April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that a California bill requiring agents to “visibly display identification” was unconstitutional.

    On Tuesday, a federal judge in Richmond enjoined Virginia from enforcing a law barring ICE agents from covering their faces.

    “It’s unfortunate the Parker administration’s own doubts were used against the bill in this injunction,” Brooks said in a statement. “No one else is dealing with that dynamic in their lawsuits.”

  • What to know about symptoms and treatment for dehydration and heat exhaustion

    What to know about symptoms and treatment for dehydration and heat exhaustion

    Brace yourselves, Philadelphians. It’s going to be a hot one out there.

    Staying healthy during the heat wave comes down to two basic things: drinking water and cooling down as much as possible.

    Here is what you need to know about heat-related illnesses:

    What are the signs of dehydration?

    Water serves critical functions in the body, including cooling it down, maintaining blood volume, and balancing electrolytes.

    Dehydration happens when individuals lose more water than they are taking in. Even though it could happen to anyone, dehydration poses a specific risk to children, elderly, and people with chronic illnesses.

    The signs of dehydration are dark-colored urine, less frequent urination, fatigue, confusion, and dizziness. With babies, parents should monitor diapers to ensure that they are continuing to provide urine.

    Untreated dehydration can contribute to heat exhaustion or heatstroke, reduced blood pressure, fainting, and seizures.

    What are the symptoms of heat exhaustion?

    As the body remains overheated, it will continue to sweat and further lose liquids. If individuals’ skin becomes cold and pale, they complain of dizziness and headaches, and seem tired or weak, these are all signs they might be suffering from heat exhaustion.

    At this stage, consider calling 911 if a person is vomiting, the symptoms get worse, or last longer than one hour.

    What are the symptoms of heatstroke?

    Heatstroke is when the body can no longer regulate its temperature. People may stop sweating and spike a fever. The cold, pale skin could turn hot and red. In addition to the fever, people may be confused, pass out, and vomit.

    If someone is vomiting, unable to drink, or losing consciousness, medical attention is likely needed in an emergency department. Medical staff there can cool the person down and provide intravenous fluids. If you suspect that someone is suffering heatstroke, call 911.

    How to prevent and treat dehydration, heat exhaustion, and heatstroke

    Water is your best friend during the heat wave. As much as possible, keep hydrated. Adequate water intake for adults is about 11 to 15 cups a day. While water is not the only hydrating drink, avoid caffeinated and alcoholic drinks, which can contribute to dehydration.

    Cooling down is also critical. Look for shade, avoid the sun, and when possible, stay inside air-conditioned buildings. This will help the body regulate heat and preserve liquid, especially during the hottest hours of the day in the afternoon.

    There are open splash parks and pools throughout the city where people can go to cool down, though if you spend time in the sun, be sure to put on sunscreen to avoid sunburns.

    For people who are dehydrated, get them to a shaded and cooler area and have them drink water. If at any point they lose consciousness, vomit, or are unable to drink, seek medical attention immediately.

    How to treat heat rash and cramps

    Two other potential unpleasant outcomes of heat are rashes and cramps.

    When sweat is trapped in the skin, a potentially itchy heat rash can appear. It can be in the form of small blisters to larger lumps. Heat rashes usually resolve without treatment when the body cools down. The CDC recommends keeping the rash dry and using baby powder to soothe itchiness. Go see a healthcare provider if the rash doesn’t go away within a few days, gets worse, or if you develop additional symptoms or are concerned that other health issues are involved.

    Heat cramps are involuntary muscle spasms that can occur due to fluid and electrolyte loss, which is common when exercising on a hot day. If you have heat cramps, stop any physical activity, move to a cool place, and drink water. A sports drink with electrolytes can also help.

    Seek medical attention if the heat cramps last longer than an hour or if you have a heart condition.